It would have to be really poor management on our part to let Defoe leave to Liverpool when we haven't got a replacement waiting in the wings.
Monkey
Do you consider Wigan as rivals for 4th place?
======================
Err nope. Whats your point?
RipleysCat,
The problem we have is, certain fans on here (not just Liverpool's) think you are anti-their club if you dont agree with them. Someone mentiond pundits earlier - not even Hansen or Lawro have put Liverpool as contenders for 4th, so why cant the Liverpool fans on here accept that others may think that too?
Its simply an opinion, and its not a far fetched one either when you think about it.
I appreciate we all love our respective clubs & we have high expectations - but fans have to realise that not everyone shares their faith in their team - and recent results, form & even the last 2 seasons support my opinion on this debate. It wasn't just a "pie in the sky" outburst.
'Unfortunately, you dont get CL footy for being "about 4th place".'
Ahh, the satisfiying sound of goalposts moving to prove that I have won an argument
CutMeAndIBleedRed thinks you get CL footy for finishing around 4th place.
No wonder you think you're a contender.
Priceless comment there fella. You have made my morning already.
'Unfortunately, you dont get CL footy for being "about 4th place".'
Ahh, the satisfying sound of goalposts moving to prove that I have won an argument
Read it again, then read it again and then one more time. Can you spot the bit where I say you get CL football for finishing around 4th? Are you seeing things again? Have you taken your meds this morning?
You see, we were having a discussion about the possibility of Liverpool finishing in fourth place - something you argue is a near impossibility. I commented that we have been around fourth all season, unlike other teams which you sarcastically suggested could be included in a realistic race for fourth. You then state that:
'Unfortunately, you dont get CL footy for being "about 4th place".'
Do you see where my comment re moving goal posts comes from now?! I can explain in more detail if you're having difficulties - or maybe your mum/carer can assist? I know Spurs are new to this, but really, you need to read the posts a little more and understand what people are saying, then your own post may be a little more coherent! Glad I made your morning, I sure your latest booboo will in term cheer up many other
It's times like these when I wish I didn't filter these idiots. When they get put right in their place and look like complete fools, licking their wounds, crying a little before they conjure up the strength to go on another WUMfest, to try make themselves feel better. The sad life of a 606 WUM. Bless.
There'sOnlyOneReds
I don't normally get involved, but this muppet is such fun!
CutMeAndIBleedRed,
You see, we were having a discussion about the possibility of Liverpool finishing in fourth place - something you argue is a near impossibility.
=========================
I didnt say impossibility - i just said you're not a contender, a view which is shared by 99% of non-Liverpool fans, together with biased pundits like Lawro & Hansen - so what does that tell you?
There'snlyneReds,
Log out, log in, log out, log in, log in, log out, log in, log in, log out, log in, log in, log out, log in...
Just to read my comments & reply.
Priceless.
Keep clutching fellas, keep clutching...
AND AGAIN - you keep on with this not reading post - please can you tell me the difference between what I said 'near impossibility' and what you said I said 'impossibility' - can you see the difference?! But of course it's us that keep clutching ain't it?!!
Can't wait for the next instalment of the Muppet Shop - let me guess 'ha ha, CutMe thinks next year is their year' or maybe 'I'm so clever, cos CutMe thinks my name is a type of Poultry - what an idiot!'
CutMeAndIBleedRed
As i said, i've bookmarked this article so we'll find out for sure in approx 4 months (maybe even before) who is right & who is the muppet, wont we?
Chicken
"I didnt say impossibility - i just said you're not a contender, a view which is shared by 99% of non-Liverpool fans, together with biased pundits like Lawro & Hansen - so what does that tell you"?
Where have you got 99% of non Liverpool fans fron? Can you prove that statement?
Again where's your proof that Lawro and Hansen have said we're not contenders for top 4?
Chicken
Argument lost so:
goal
posts
moved!!!!
Now you're going in a loop - no need to answer that comment cos I already have!!
comment by Chicken (the artist formally known as Chicken on a Basketball) ©™ (U1043)
posted 17 hours, 58 minutes ago
Monkey
Do you consider Wigan as rivals for 4th place?
======================
Err nope. Whats your point?
===============================================
Chicken - It just struck me. Is your first name 'Mike' by any chance?
If so, you're making less sense than your namesake ever did during his brief life...
...he did have the greater intellectual capacity, mind you!!
That's all. Clear?
red_man23
Where have you got 99% of non Liverpool fans fron? Can you prove that statement?
Again where's your proof that Lawro and Hansen have said we're not contenders for top 4?
========================
Obviously i dont have proof of the 99% of non-Liverpool fans - that is just a general perception. But i will create an article & provide proof on this later on today, either way. So we'll see.
As for Lawro saying you wont make Top 4, please read:
http://www.liverpool-kop.com/2011/10/lfc-legend-liverpool-are-not-good.html
I cant find a link for Hansen, so you'll just have to watch MotD & hear it from the horse's mouth.
I see the "debate" has descended even further into semantics
Liverpool board
Chicken - "Obviously i dont have proof of the 99% of non-Liverpool fans - that is just a general perception."
Another spurious factoid from the 'headless' one. That's your 'general perception' then.
But, fact is, you're not very perceptive at all, as you prove time and time and time again.
Bãle's
Mostly, it is okay. The odd poster is trying to spoil it, as you can see. We're even getting a poster who has filtered me turning up, logging out to see my posts, then logging back in to reply (daft , i know) - so we could do without that too. But there are alot of links being provided to prove aspects of our posts, which is good.
Monkey,
As i say, i will create an article & we'll see if my figure is correct or not. Who knows, it could even be 100%, we just dont know yet. The joke could yet be on you (again).
Chicken
That Lawro article was written on the 26th Oct last year . The season had barely started and it's possible his attitude has changed since then. On one hand you say Lawro doesn't think we're in the running for top 4. On the other he's criticised by rival fans for always predicting us to win, and being biased on MOTD.
The reason you can't find a Hansen article is because there isn't one.
You could write articles all day long about whether Liverpool will finish in the top 4. If you post it on the Arsenal, Chelsea and Spurs boards you're bound to find the answer you want. Why is that?
The long and short of it is, it's all your opinion. But you're trying to pass it off as fact. You don't think we're in the running for top 4, that's fair enough. We disagree, also fair enough.
Stop trying to invalidate our opinion by claiming yours is backed up by non existent facts .
Some posters just haven't got the hang of sensible debate and some display a terrible lack of knowledge of the sport they're attempting to 'discuss'....always a disadvantage for them.
Chicken - the 'yolk' is most definitely on YOU
Bãle's left boot (U9410)
"I see the "debate" has descended even further into semantics"
I stated something yesterday (about Liverpool being 7th in Jan and 4th in May) and Chicken asked me to prove it.
Am I not entitled to do the same?
No - Liverpool are not taken seriously as contenders for Top 4
red_man23
Yes, you are entitled to do the same.
Unfortunately, it doesnt appear that any quotes from the MotD pundits are documented anywhere - so i draw a blank on that one in terms of "proof".
But my opinion poll is up & away so i'll calculate the percentage later on today & reveal the results (proof) for that one.
Chicken
Have you taken in mind the obvious flaw in your poll? If you ask an Arsenal fan will Liverpool finish in the top 4 they will say no. Why is that? Because they think Arsenal will (as they are 5th at the mo). The same applies for Chelsea fans (4th at the mo) and Spurs fans. Utd fans would say no of you asked if Liverpool played in red. City fans IMO are the only one's who would give an unbiased opinion.
Just face it, it's your opinion and I and others disagree. It's not that hard to take.
Sign in if you want to comment
Defoe
Page 10 of 34
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
posted on 18/1/12
It would have to be really poor management on our part to let Defoe leave to Liverpool when we haven't got a replacement waiting in the wings.
posted on 18/1/12
Monkey
Do you consider Wigan as rivals for 4th place?
======================
Err nope. Whats your point?
RipleysCat,
The problem we have is, certain fans on here (not just Liverpool's) think you are anti-their club if you dont agree with them. Someone mentiond pundits earlier - not even Hansen or Lawro have put Liverpool as contenders for 4th, so why cant the Liverpool fans on here accept that others may think that too?
Its simply an opinion, and its not a far fetched one either when you think about it.
I appreciate we all love our respective clubs & we have high expectations - but fans have to realise that not everyone shares their faith in their team - and recent results, form & even the last 2 seasons support my opinion on this debate. It wasn't just a "pie in the sky" outburst.
posted on 19/1/12
'Unfortunately, you dont get CL footy for being "about 4th place".'
Ahh, the satisfiying sound of goalposts moving to prove that I have won an argument
posted on 19/1/12
CutMeAndIBleedRed thinks you get CL footy for finishing around 4th place.
No wonder you think you're a contender.
Priceless comment there fella. You have made my morning already.
posted on 19/1/12
'Unfortunately, you dont get CL footy for being "about 4th place".'
Ahh, the satisfying sound of goalposts moving to prove that I have won an argument
Read it again, then read it again and then one more time. Can you spot the bit where I say you get CL football for finishing around 4th? Are you seeing things again? Have you taken your meds this morning?
You see, we were having a discussion about the possibility of Liverpool finishing in fourth place - something you argue is a near impossibility. I commented that we have been around fourth all season, unlike other teams which you sarcastically suggested could be included in a realistic race for fourth. You then state that:
'Unfortunately, you dont get CL footy for being "about 4th place".'
Do you see where my comment re moving goal posts comes from now?! I can explain in more detail if you're having difficulties - or maybe your mum/carer can assist? I know Spurs are new to this, but really, you need to read the posts a little more and understand what people are saying, then your own post may be a little more coherent! Glad I made your morning, I sure your latest booboo will in term cheer up many other
posted on 19/1/12
It's times like these when I wish I didn't filter these idiots. When they get put right in their place and look like complete fools, licking their wounds, crying a little before they conjure up the strength to go on another WUMfest, to try make themselves feel better. The sad life of a 606 WUM. Bless.
posted on 19/1/12
There'sOnlyOneReds
I don't normally get involved, but this muppet is such fun!
posted on 19/1/12
CutMeAndIBleedRed,
You see, we were having a discussion about the possibility of Liverpool finishing in fourth place - something you argue is a near impossibility.
=========================
I didnt say impossibility - i just said you're not a contender, a view which is shared by 99% of non-Liverpool fans, together with biased pundits like Lawro & Hansen - so what does that tell you?
There'snlyneReds,
Log out, log in, log out, log in, log in, log out, log in, log in, log out, log in, log in, log out, log in...
Just to read my comments & reply.
Priceless.
Keep clutching fellas, keep clutching...
posted on 19/1/12
AND AGAIN - you keep on with this not reading post - please can you tell me the difference between what I said 'near impossibility' and what you said I said 'impossibility' - can you see the difference?! But of course it's us that keep clutching ain't it?!!
Can't wait for the next instalment of the Muppet Shop - let me guess 'ha ha, CutMe thinks next year is their year' or maybe 'I'm so clever, cos CutMe thinks my name is a type of Poultry - what an idiot!'
posted on 19/1/12
CutMeAndIBleedRed
As i said, i've bookmarked this article so we'll find out for sure in approx 4 months (maybe even before) who is right & who is the muppet, wont we?
posted on 19/1/12
Chicken
"I didnt say impossibility - i just said you're not a contender, a view which is shared by 99% of non-Liverpool fans, together with biased pundits like Lawro & Hansen - so what does that tell you"?
Where have you got 99% of non Liverpool fans fron? Can you prove that statement?
Again where's your proof that Lawro and Hansen have said we're not contenders for top 4?
posted on 19/1/12
Chicken
Argument lost so:
goal
posts
moved!!!!
Now you're going in a loop - no need to answer that comment cos I already have!!
posted on 19/1/12
comment by Chicken (the artist formally known as Chicken on a Basketball) ©™ (U1043)
posted 17 hours, 58 minutes ago
Monkey
Do you consider Wigan as rivals for 4th place?
======================
Err nope. Whats your point?
===============================================
Chicken - It just struck me. Is your first name 'Mike' by any chance?
If so, you're making less sense than your namesake ever did during his brief life...
...he did have the greater intellectual capacity, mind you!!
That's all. Clear?
posted on 19/1/12
red_man23
Where have you got 99% of non Liverpool fans fron? Can you prove that statement?
Again where's your proof that Lawro and Hansen have said we're not contenders for top 4?
========================
Obviously i dont have proof of the 99% of non-Liverpool fans - that is just a general perception. But i will create an article & provide proof on this later on today, either way. So we'll see.
As for Lawro saying you wont make Top 4, please read:
http://www.liverpool-kop.com/2011/10/lfc-legend-liverpool-are-not-good.html
I cant find a link for Hansen, so you'll just have to watch MotD & hear it from the horse's mouth.
posted on 19/1/12
I see the "debate" has descended even further into semantics
Liverpool board
posted on 19/1/12
Chicken - "Obviously i dont have proof of the 99% of non-Liverpool fans - that is just a general perception."
Another spurious factoid from the 'headless' one. That's your 'general perception' then.
But, fact is, you're not very perceptive at all, as you prove time and time and time again.
posted on 19/1/12
Bãle's
Mostly, it is okay. The odd poster is trying to spoil it, as you can see. We're even getting a poster who has filtered me turning up, logging out to see my posts, then logging back in to reply (daft , i know) - so we could do without that too. But there are alot of links being provided to prove aspects of our posts, which is good.
posted on 19/1/12
Monkey,
As i say, i will create an article & we'll see if my figure is correct or not. Who knows, it could even be 100%, we just dont know yet. The joke could yet be on you (again).
posted on 19/1/12
Chicken
That Lawro article was written on the 26th Oct last year . The season had barely started and it's possible his attitude has changed since then. On one hand you say Lawro doesn't think we're in the running for top 4. On the other he's criticised by rival fans for always predicting us to win, and being biased on MOTD.
The reason you can't find a Hansen article is because there isn't one.
You could write articles all day long about whether Liverpool will finish in the top 4. If you post it on the Arsenal, Chelsea and Spurs boards you're bound to find the answer you want. Why is that?
The long and short of it is, it's all your opinion. But you're trying to pass it off as fact. You don't think we're in the running for top 4, that's fair enough. We disagree, also fair enough.
Stop trying to invalidate our opinion by claiming yours is backed up by non existent facts .
posted on 19/1/12
Some posters just haven't got the hang of sensible debate and some display a terrible lack of knowledge of the sport they're attempting to 'discuss'....always a disadvantage for them.
posted on 19/1/12
Chicken - the 'yolk' is most definitely on YOU
posted on 19/1/12
Bãle's left boot (U9410)
"I see the "debate" has descended even further into semantics"
I stated something yesterday (about Liverpool being 7th in Jan and 4th in May) and Chicken asked me to prove it.
Am I not entitled to do the same?
posted on 19/1/12
No - Liverpool are not taken seriously as contenders for Top 4
posted on 19/1/12
red_man23
Yes, you are entitled to do the same.
Unfortunately, it doesnt appear that any quotes from the MotD pundits are documented anywhere - so i draw a blank on that one in terms of "proof".
But my opinion poll is up & away so i'll calculate the percentage later on today & reveal the results (proof) for that one.
posted on 19/1/12
Chicken
Have you taken in mind the obvious flaw in your poll? If you ask an Arsenal fan will Liverpool finish in the top 4 they will say no. Why is that? Because they think Arsenal will (as they are 5th at the mo). The same applies for Chelsea fans (4th at the mo) and Spurs fans. Utd fans would say no of you asked if Liverpool played in red. City fans IMO are the only one's who would give an unbiased opinion.
Just face it, it's your opinion and I and others disagree. It's not that hard to take.
Page 10 of 34
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15