i stated that terry would be found not guilty and that terrys brief would destroy the "evidence",thats whats happened its no suprise

PJ's been allowed out on your own today

comment by Pride of the North (U6803)


I can't understand how you think saying it once or twice is better than saying it 5 or 6 times?

--------------------

Nobody has said that, you are changing the argument.

We were talking about being consistent, i.e. telling the same story, whatever it is, repeatedly without changing any of the content.

Evra changed the content by changing the numbers.

This is inconsistency.

Sure suarez will peruse a court hearing to clear his name.........

He's going to have a look round?

I'm going to take a wild stab in the dark here and say it's a slow day on the Everton board today.

You four not able to muster up your own threads again?

comment by Lucas The Destroyer - Borini Is World (U11770)
posted 4 minutes ago
Shut up vidic.

....................

Why, just because you sad lot can't handle the truth.

Lucas...a jury of his peers found him not guilty..
-------------------
No they didn't.

There was no jury.

What truth?

Why, just because you sad lot can't handle the truth.
.....

Truth ??

The dossier actually says that it relies on probability - not truth.

Have you been living under a rock

Metro_ (U6770)

Be gentle with him please. He has a personality disorder which coupled with delusions of granduer and a lack of match attendance makes him come across as a weird no-mark. It's not his fault. He was born like it.

comment by Lucas The Destroyer - Borini Is World (U11770)
posted 26 seconds ago
What truth?

......................

The truth. That Luis made racist remarks to Evra. Jesus, Lucas, he admitted it himself.

This is from the FA report.

“He says that he used the word “negro” in a way with which he was familiar from his upbringing in Uruguay. In this sense, Mr Suarez claimed, it is used as a noun and as a friendly form of address to people seen as black or brown-skinned (or even just black-haired). Thus, it meant “Why, black?” states the report.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Mourinho´s Omelette (U7916)

I did actually and ALL of them said that they did not hear him say it. Perhaps you should flick through it yourself?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Greatteams - great minds

Yes but you're passing interviews off as proof of racial abuse when none of those interviews conclucively prooves it you dope.

Greatteams -

Its incredible just how many people haven't even researched the case.

They're spouting new information and criticising us

It's funny when someone who clearly hasn't read the report turns round and tells us to.......

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

that is irrelevant, there was no proof, you cant label someone racist on guesswork, pathetic.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Suarez racially abused Evra. Terry did not racially abuse anybody. This is why he was found not guilty and Suarez was. What is there to discuss?

Suarez admitted calling his a "n****" which if you have Spanish background, you know is a racist insult. Terry has maintained throughout that he was repeating an accusation thrown at him and there was absolutely no evidence that he wasn't.

Evra, the abused player, complained. A member of the public made the complaint about Terry after lip-reading and Ferdinand was pressured to give evidence as the "abused".

Completely different cases.

Greatteamswinit4times(redrobtheredforDon) (U6008)

He's married with kids you know.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator