or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 242 comments are related to an article called:

PL - The One team league!!

Page 7 of 10

posted on 9/2/13

Unfortunately they spent over £300 million....

posted on 9/2/13

And what was their expenditure?

posted on 9/2/13

about £200 million went on wages

posted on 9/2/13

"There lies the answer, start winning!!!"


ok

you donate all the money you get annually that ensures success to a general league fairness fund and other teams will start winning!!!

posted on 9/2/13

Funny thing is united don't even need the money from tv and all that jazz, We are one of the most supported teams on the planet and have been a massively supported club for over half a century probably longer, money can't buy history

posted on 9/2/13

Why should we donate money, when we werent winning 70s and 80s those at the top werent donating money out to help us

posted on 9/2/13

you donate all the money you get annually that ensures success to a general league fairness fund and other teams will start winning!!!
-----
Pathetic, Its clear as day your just bitter towards Utd, liverpool had their time and what did they do, they didnt invest in the the team or ground, its your own fault

posted on 9/2/13

Kaiser, why do Liverpool have more money than say Barnsley ?
Because you are a bigger club than them.
United are a bigger club than everyone else, so thats why they EARN more money. seriously dumb some people.

posted on 9/2/13

In fact with the shared tv rights deal in the Premier League, United are being generous to the other teams.

We could go down the La Liga route, go our own way and negotiate our own tv deal. We would blow every other team out the water with the money we would rake in.

So ye should all be grateful we have agreed to play fair and split the money out equally with the other teams.

posted on 9/2/13

you donate all the money you get annually that ensures success to a general league fairness fund and other teams will start winning!!!
---
Then why aren't Manchester City winning, when it's all about the money?

Why aren't Real Madrid winning if it's all about the money?

Why are Swansea in the final of the CC if it's all about the money?

Why are German teams beating everyone in the C.L, if it's all about the money?

You know what makes me laugh about this article is the true birth of it all. It is from a City fan, who thought they could throw as much money into a team and become Manchester United. Only to realise, that they can throw and throw, but it means absolutely nothing. Nothing they ever will do, will make them Manchester United.

It's the same reason why nobody can be Liverpool. What our clubs have simply can not be bought.

posted on 9/2/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 9/2/13

absolutely true, United subsidise the rest of the league. Especially in respect of the overseas TV rights. 60% of the viewing figures are for United games, but they get 5% of the income.

posted on 10/2/13

OK, I change my mind

We should funnel nearly all the TV and sponsorship money to one club and hope that other clubs, if they're managed to perfection and no clubs with bigger sponsorship deals buy their best best players for half a century, that it will end up even and competitive.

Oh wait, FFP already recommended that. To be 'fair'

My bad.

posted on 10/2/13

United propping up the rest of the league financially, they should all be thanking us

posted on 10/2/13

"Then why aren't Manchester City winning, when it's all about the money?

Why aren't Real Madrid winning if it's all about the money?"

they just both won titles

??

that's your argument?

posted on 10/2/13

why dont Liverpool give half their income to Everton then to even things up in your city ? That would be a start.

posted on 10/2/13

But both wont win this season

Thats his arguement

posted on 10/2/13

Everton are already above them with a smaller budget, if they had to them more of their money, god only knows how far they would be behind them

posted on 10/2/13

if you want to see uncompetetive look at Spain where the top two get 90% of all the TV and sponsorship money.
Its nothing like that in the Premier League. You really are an idiot.

posted on 10/2/13

Why aren't Real Madrid winning if it's all about the money?"

they just both won titles
---
Then why is the OP crying that Man United are unfairly going to win the league and the league really is a 1 man league, when City won the league last season?

posted on 10/2/13

Also, why are you suggesting we give our money away so other teams can win, when you just pointed out that City won a title last season. Our ridiculous spending isn't getting in a teams way of not winning.

posted on 10/2/13

Really everyone should be thanking United

United are the main reason why the league gets so much tv money

This money (generated by United) is then split equally between everyone.

posted on 10/2/13

someone is just bitter that they got to the stage in life where they realse they support the wrong team

posted on 10/2/13

at the end of the day i really dont want a fair league

Everton and Spurs would be winning titles and I wouldn't have the chance to go to finals at Wembley, take home European cups, and see top players at Anfield.

Money and an unfair playing field gave me all that.

But if it wa

posted on 10/2/13

United are the main reason why the league gets so much tv money

City earnt more TV money than United last season so how does that work?

Page 7 of 10

Sign in if you want to comment