I hate him less than Bendtner. He's just not Arsenal quality and we are paying him too much and he won't go and play for less. That's annoying but we've only got ourselves to blame, really.
He hasn't done anything wrong except be a painfully average player, his early career form was good, probably boosted by motivation more than talent.
Chamakh is dross but he can't help that. My problem with him is that he doesn't even have a good attitude, it's a known fact that he regular smokes shisha and as a pro footballer you should not be doing things like that. Not in this day and age.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Early form Chamakh was better than Giroud has ever been for us.
Don't forget he had fabregas, wilshere and nasri supporting him
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
He really linked up well with Wilshere. Brought out some of Wilshere's best moments with him in his breakout season
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Cesc made him look better than he ones.
Definitely one of our worst of late
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Chamakh in the early days had a good touch, did some nice flicks and passes, good shot and was decent in the air. Then van Persie came back and he was never heard of again.
He's a good player awful striker. So basically he's shït as he isn't good enough to be a playmaker winger or a goal scorer.
He was a good player and worked hard, went downhill once RVP came back.
Not sure about the list of "unknown French players" in the OP. Clichy okay, but even Anelka had already buiot a big rep, chased by all the biggest clubs. The likes of Henry, Pires and Wiltord had won major international honours while Henry and Vieira had already had one big transfer.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Chamak hate. Is it justified?
Page 1 of 1
posted on 1/8/13
His hair
posted on 1/8/13
I hate him less than Bendtner. He's just not Arsenal quality and we are paying him too much and he won't go and play for less. That's annoying but we've only got ourselves to blame, really.
posted on 1/8/13
He hasn't done anything wrong except be a painfully average player, his early career form was good, probably boosted by motivation more than talent.
posted on 1/8/13
Chamakh is dross but he can't help that. My problem with him is that he doesn't even have a good attitude, it's a known fact that he regular smokes shisha and as a pro footballer you should not be doing things like that. Not in this day and age.
posted on 1/8/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/8/13
Early form Chamakh was better than Giroud has ever been for us.
posted on 1/8/13
Don't forget he had fabregas, wilshere and nasri supporting him
posted on 1/8/13
Still, Chamakh is $hit.
posted on 1/8/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/8/13
He really linked up well with Wilshere. Brought out some of Wilshere's best moments with him in his breakout season
posted on 1/8/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/8/13
Cesc made him look better than he ones.
Definitely one of our worst of late
posted on 1/8/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/8/13
Chamakh in the early days had a good touch, did some nice flicks and passes, good shot and was decent in the air. Then van Persie came back and he was never heard of again.
posted on 1/8/13
He's a good player awful striker. So basically he's shït as he isn't good enough to be a playmaker winger or a goal scorer.
posted on 2/8/13
He was a good player and worked hard, went downhill once RVP came back.
posted on 2/8/13
Not sure about the list of "unknown French players" in the OP. Clichy okay, but even Anelka had already buiot a big rep, chased by all the biggest clubs. The likes of Henry, Pires and Wiltord had won major international honours while Henry and Vieira had already had one big transfer.
Page 1 of 1