wtf no stop with all this hate on torres just believe in him.
the 50m price tag is not his fault its liverpools

Question

If Torres is a mercenary what does that make Joe Cole?

Liverpools fault????????????????????????????

Did Comolli hold Romans arm and give him a chinese burn until he paid £50m?

andy carrol for 35 m pounds any1?

yes for valuing him to high.
In a situation we were in on the wrost run ever and we didnt have a choice but to stretghten didnt have time to waste over the fee. liverpool didnts think wed pay it but we did so what get ovr the fee.

T Bone Steak Roysters (U3947)

And a wet willy so I'm told

Torres is still better value for money than Carroll at 35m. And Torres isn't good value for money.

City can't accomodate all those forwards.

Tbk - Exactly my point !! ... but i think if we sell him itll come back to haunt us hes good

comment by The Blue Kenyan ¡Viva Sturridge! (U1641) posted 1 minute ago

Torres is still better value for money than Carroll at 35m. And Torres isn't good value for money.
------------------------------------------------------
Spot on.

I feel embarrassed for Liverpool when I watch Carroll play.

Yeah, 1 goal in 21 games is some return. Obviously Torres is much better than Carroll.

And how it's Liverpools 'fault' that Chelsea paid £50M is beyond me, that's beyond a joke...

Torres would be better value for money if he could score some goals but he doesn't and that is what you paid that stupid price for him to do.

Why do Chelsea want to buy all our rejects?

Why do people keep slating £35mill for Carroll... It's not £35 mill for Carroll it's Suarez and Carroll for Torres and Babel the owner explained that himself!

Why did yuo pay 35million for Carroll just to put him on the bench after realising he's not good enough?

"Why do people keep slating £35mill for Carroll... It's not £35 mill for Carroll it's Suarez and Carroll for Torres and Babel the owner explained that himself!"

What, I don't even....

35+22= 57
50+7= 57

The numbers represent the prices for the 4 players

T Bone

You're the club who have to resort to buying our rejects to have any LEague winners in your side

City can't accomodate all those forwards

City no longer need to improve their squad,so their next move is to weaken everybody else.
____________________________________________________________

Yeah, 1 goal in 21 games is some return. Obviously Torres is much better than Carroll

Torres has looked sharp of late, even though he's not scoring, where's Carroll just looks sh-it.

Why did yuo pay 35million for Carroll just to put him on the bench after realising he's not good enough?
_____________

Jeez, talk about going over old ground. We NEEDED a striker after offloading Torres, so we got rolled over by Newcastle who knew we had money from that sale.

Effectively Carroll cost us £15M, injured at the time and just getting back to fitness at the start of this season.

You keep banging on about Carroll, but he's scored more goals than Torres in significantly less matches. At what point does that sink in?

PabloDiablo- (U7438)

What game did you watch him in just out of interest?

Have you got a link for this ?

Torres has looked sharp of late, even though he's not scoring, where's Carroll just looks sh-it.
___________

True. And Carroll has still out scored Torres.

"Torres has looked sharp of late, even though he's not scoring, where's Carroll just looks sh-it".

Really, when was that?