I wonder where the accountant is that advised Murray Group Holdings that this was legal and above board is? How many more appeals are there here, does anyone know? And, as there will be more appeals, shouldn't we wait until the process is complete before comments like Alex Thomson's?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

it was mad porrno pedro that advised it was it not?

here's one for the ring..if the old Rangers are found to have gained a sporting advantage, can supporters of other other clubs sue Murray et al for season books etc?

comment by #Murnetti - that's the bottom line . (U3627)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Edgie (U7142)
posted 42 minutes ago
Elite see pervious statement
Found guilty by the HMRC
and by lord Nimmo Smith
which bit don't you get??

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Edgie your poetry is scheidt

It would be better as

Elite - which bit don't you get??
previous statement see
Found guilty by Lord Nimmo Smith
And the HMRC

----------------------------------------------------------------------
gold star stuff mate

Little point in appealing.
Only way this affects me is the chat will be away from the ptich again.

Incidetly, alike pawrno pedro, Celtic were advised to use them, then after using them were advised against it.

Wish we had been but, it is what it is. There will be plenty more loopholes used, closed, misused and plenty more cases in the future.

I don't know if any will receive this level of mopery and bring out as many mock offended.

This nurses pash is embarrassing. Let's admit it's been a learning curve, a cracking stick to beat your opponents with and overall pretty fvckin tediously repetitive.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Yeah, I will admit I've never felt right about all the digs about sending troops to war without proper equipment and nurses stuff.

I only care about the unfair advantage on the pitch, and it doesn't take the greatest legal mind to see that this is what Rangers got from the now officially illegal tax scheme.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Sjb1888 (U5188)
posted 12 minutes ago
Yeah, I will admit I've never felt right about all the digs about sending troops to war without proper equipment and nurses stuff.

I only care about the unfair advantage on the pitch, and it doesn't take the greatest legal mind to see that this is what Rangers got from the now officially illegal tax scheme.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And what if they appeal and win it? Up until today it was unresolved in a lot of people's eyes, is that the end of it?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by bubblebhoy (U3429)
posted 55 minutes ago
here's one for the ring..if the old Rangers are found to have gained a sporting advantage, can supporters of other other clubs sue Murray et al for season books etc?
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Yea it's covered under the clutching at straws act 2015

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I love how there are bears on this thread saying rangers wont appeal but laudrup just focuses on Celtic fans

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Laudrup: That's Entertainment (U12366)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Sjb1888 (U5188)
posted 12 minutes ago
Yeah, I will admit I've never felt right about all the digs about sending troops to war without proper equipment and nurses stuff.

I only care about the unfair advantage on the pitch, and it doesn't take the greatest legal mind to see that this is what Rangers got from the now officially illegal tax scheme.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And what if they appeal and win it? Up until today it was unresolved in a lot of people's eyes, is that the end of it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From my point of view it has always been clear, as was stated today, it's a matter of common sense.

But if an appeal is lodged (very unlikely) and it somehow goes Rangers way then by all means continue with the self delusion.

#54 and counting

(the amount of times Paul the tim has had to hide his boner)

stolen from the old firm facts twitter page

comment by JFK - Fonesty is my middle name (U8919)
posted 1 minute ago
I love how there are bears on this thread saying rangers wont appeal but laudrup just focuses on Celtic fans
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's only because Celtic fans haven't said a word about it dignity intact

Do you think I'm going to read through 241 posts of sh!!t

comment by PointyBirds (U8853)
posted 1 minute ago
pretty fvckin tediously repetitive.
---
Maybe for YOUSE...
----------------------------------------------------------------------


I'll wager all apart from maybe irvine and timmy got a bit sick of talking about it

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by It's a conspiracy (U3657)
posted 3 seconds ago
I wonder where the accountant is that advised Murray Group Holdings that this was legal and above board is? How many more appeals are there here, does anyone know? And, as there will be more appeals, shouldn't we wait until the process is complete before comments like Alex Thomson's?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The accountant who advised rangers is now a p 0 rn star.

I'm not even making that up

comment by lauders you cwnt👌 The Real McKay 👌 More... (U9757)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by PointyBirds (U8853)
posted 1 minute ago
pretty fvckin tediously repetitive.
---
Maybe for YOUSE...
----------------------------------------------------------------------


I'll wager all apart from maybe irvine and timmy got a bit sick of talking about it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Completely, but I think this development today changes things for a little bit...

Comment deleted by Site Moderator