comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Kamikaze Blue (U7450)
posted 17 minutes ago
If you want a good laugh find out how Hilary is supposed to have intimidated the women Trump wheeled out. For example one of them believes that Hilary arranged for a cats skull to be put oh her door step, and stole the text of her book. It really is at that level of nuts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what's the good laugh bit?
if she had done something more sinister would it be funnier or less funny?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The good laugh is that the accusations are off the scale nuts. Another claims that she met Hilary only once when Hilary said she was glad the woman was supporting Bill. This apparently was a veiled threat. Another was a girl who was raped and Hilary was defence for her rapist. She was appointed as defence and had no choice. These smears are up there with the birther stuff. Insane crap from a guy who long ago lost touch with truth or honesty. Clinton is far from perfect but Trump is insane.
These smears are up there with the birther stuff.
................................
The cynic in me can only think of one reason why Trump would still rant about that after he was proved wrong.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 12 minutes ago
dont really see it like that,
.............
Your problem, among many it seems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it's not a problem old chap, it's a difference of opinion
the BBC don't present two sides of the story, thats the issue I have
This entire election process is all about Hillary getting back in the White Haus and Trump getting his own TV channel. Trump is a carnival barker who's putting on a cross between Mussolini and Moe Howard to make the debates "interesting", but all I see is madness and 2 very un-electable, very sad examples of humans out there. Being a politician is a job unfit for a dog these days, there's the proof now for ya! LAUS
it's not a problem old chap
................
It clearly is, as you have whined about it for the last couple of hours.
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 2 minutes ago
the BBC don't present two sides of the story, thats the issue I have
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There are other news outlets.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 minutes ago
These smears are up there with the birther stuff.
................................
The cynic in me can only think of one reason why Trump would still rant about that after he was proved wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is sometimes hard to believe he wants to win. I think he wants to lose but push her to the limit. Satisfy his ego without actually landing him in the oval office.
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 2 minutes ago
the BBC don't present two sides of the story, thats the issue I have
..............
Once again, don't watch or read it, then. I don't like the Sun, Mail or Mirror because their news coverage is poor. Guess what, I don't read them any more.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
it's not a problem old chap
................
It clearly is, as you have whined about it for the last couple of hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sorry allow me to clarify - it's not a problem that we don't agree
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 2 minutes ago
the BBC don't present two sides of the story, thats the issue I have
..............
Once again, don't watch or read it, then. I don't like the Sun, Mail or Mirror because their news coverage is poor. Guess what, I don't read them any more.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you don't have to pay them though in order to read any other newspaper, you dont get it do you?
you don't have to pay them though in order to read any other newspaper, you dont get it do you?
...........
No I don't get it. You are whining about the BBC being biased in it's coverage, but watch it anyway because you don't have the common sense to watch a news channel that isn't biased.
Trump or Clinton? Not even worthy of debate, Clinton hands down.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 3 minutes ago
you don't have to pay them though in order to read any other newspaper, you dont get it do you?
...........
No I don't get it. You are whining about the BBC being biased in it's coverage, but watch it anyway because you don't have the common sense to watch a news channel that isn't biased.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it's the having to fund it part that i have a problem with and before you say dont have a licence then, you need one to watch other channels aswell so like I say they should remain impartial at all times
The BBC is fantastic. Go to the US and try Fox for the news - then you'll know what bias really is.
comment by Henrik's Forehead (U20634)
posted 4 minutes ago
Trump or Clinton? Not even worthy of debate, Clinton hands down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well it kinda is, that's why we've had 265 comments on it you're voting for the evil woman as opposed to the silly man - great
comment by Kamikaze Blue (U7450)
posted 19 seconds ago
The BBC is fantastic. Go to the US and try Fox for the news - then you'll know what bias really is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
do Fox charge a licence fee? - this is the key part of my frustration
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Henrik's Forehead (U20634)
posted 4 minutes ago
Trump or Clinton? Not even worthy of debate, Clinton hands down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well it kinda is, that's why we've had 265 comments on ityou're voting for the evil woman as opposed to the silly man - great
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What has Clinton done that is "evil"?
She has made plenty of mistakes and been very naive at times, but "evil"?
If America had any sense, Clinton would be on around 70 percent in the polls at the moment.
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 3 minutes ago
you don't have to pay them though in order to read any other newspaper, you dont get it do you?
...........
No I don't get it. You are whining about the BBC being biased in it's coverage, but watch it anyway because you don't have the common sense to watch a news channel that isn't biased.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it's the having to fund it part that i have a problem with and before you say dont have a licence then, you need one to watch other channels aswell so like I say they should remain impartial at all times
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So, lets say you have a valid point with the BBC example.
However, your original argument was that the media as a whole should be unbiased. Thats really not a good idea at all. You need to be able to review how the news events can have an affect on the world. To do that you need people from various different backgrounds giving their perspective.
Without that analysis you can't be well informed.
it's the having to fund it part that i have a problem with
..............
Tough crap then. Oh and I do agree that the BBC should be impartial.
The BBC is very bias tbf, if they insist everyone pays license fees they should be neutral.
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
because the BBC for example are paid for by the British public by way of licences, we are not giving them the permission to be bias in anyway, their role is to provide the news in an impartial way to the public.
.................
Don't watch the BBC then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont really see it like that, I'm not paying any other media outlet to lie to me, why should the BBC get away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What have the BBC lied to you about?
If America had any sense, Clinton would be on around 70 percent in the polls at the moment.
..................
Henrick
Your first comment suggested you were leaning the other way.
Another element of why Trump is a terrible idea is that he's a danger to the very idea of representative democracy. He basically refuses to set out policies (or makes wildly contradictory assertions about his intentions, eg suggesting both that Clinton is a warmonger and that he'll adopt a far more aggressive foreign policy) other than fantasies such as the Great Wall, and invites the public to simply trust him because he's good at leadership and making deals. In other words, don't worry about the details - trust me to do the right thing. This infantilises the voter. It's the territory of dictatorship, not grown up democratic politics. Even in defeat he'll have done great damage to US politics and US political discourse.
comment by CoutinhosHappyFeet (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
because the BBC for example are paid for by the British public by way of licences, we are not giving them the permission to be bias in anyway, their role is to provide the news in an impartial way to the public.
.................
Don't watch the BBC then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont really see it like that, I'm not paying any other media outlet to lie to me, why should the BBC get away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What have the BBC lied to you about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They must have carried that interview with Martinez that time he guaranteed Everton champions league qualification
Trump or Clinton
Page 11 of 107
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
posted on 12/10/16
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Kamikaze Blue (U7450)
posted 17 minutes ago
If you want a good laugh find out how Hilary is supposed to have intimidated the women Trump wheeled out. For example one of them believes that Hilary arranged for a cats skull to be put oh her door step, and stole the text of her book. It really is at that level of nuts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what's the good laugh bit?
if she had done something more sinister would it be funnier or less funny?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The good laugh is that the accusations are off the scale nuts. Another claims that she met Hilary only once when Hilary said she was glad the woman was supporting Bill. This apparently was a veiled threat. Another was a girl who was raped and Hilary was defence for her rapist. She was appointed as defence and had no choice. These smears are up there with the birther stuff. Insane crap from a guy who long ago lost touch with truth or honesty. Clinton is far from perfect but Trump is insane.
posted on 12/10/16
These smears are up there with the birther stuff.
................................
The cynic in me can only think of one reason why Trump would still rant about that after he was proved wrong.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 12 minutes ago
dont really see it like that,
.............
Your problem, among many it seems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it's not a problem old chap, it's a difference of opinion
posted on 12/10/16
the BBC don't present two sides of the story, thats the issue I have
posted on 12/10/16
This entire election process is all about Hillary getting back in the White Haus and Trump getting his own TV channel. Trump is a carnival barker who's putting on a cross between Mussolini and Moe Howard to make the debates "interesting", but all I see is madness and 2 very un-electable, very sad examples of humans out there. Being a politician is a job unfit for a dog these days, there's the proof now for ya! LAUS
posted on 12/10/16
it's not a problem old chap
................
It clearly is, as you have whined about it for the last couple of hours.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 2 minutes ago
the BBC don't present two sides of the story, thats the issue I have
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There are other news outlets.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 minutes ago
These smears are up there with the birther stuff.
................................
The cynic in me can only think of one reason why Trump would still rant about that after he was proved wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is sometimes hard to believe he wants to win. I think he wants to lose but push her to the limit. Satisfy his ego without actually landing him in the oval office.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 2 minutes ago
the BBC don't present two sides of the story, thats the issue I have
..............
Once again, don't watch or read it, then. I don't like the Sun, Mail or Mirror because their news coverage is poor. Guess what, I don't read them any more.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
it's not a problem old chap
................
It clearly is, as you have whined about it for the last couple of hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sorry allow me to clarify - it's not a problem that we don't agree
posted on 12/10/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 2 minutes ago
the BBC don't present two sides of the story, thats the issue I have
..............
Once again, don't watch or read it, then. I don't like the Sun, Mail or Mirror because their news coverage is poor. Guess what, I don't read them any more.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you don't have to pay them though in order to read any other newspaper, you dont get it do you?
posted on 12/10/16
you don't have to pay them though in order to read any other newspaper, you dont get it do you?
...........
No I don't get it. You are whining about the BBC being biased in it's coverage, but watch it anyway because you don't have the common sense to watch a news channel that isn't biased.
posted on 12/10/16
Trump or Clinton? Not even worthy of debate, Clinton hands down.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 3 minutes ago
you don't have to pay them though in order to read any other newspaper, you dont get it do you?
...........
No I don't get it. You are whining about the BBC being biased in it's coverage, but watch it anyway because you don't have the common sense to watch a news channel that isn't biased.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it's the having to fund it part that i have a problem with and before you say dont have a licence then, you need one to watch other channels aswell so like I say they should remain impartial at all times
posted on 12/10/16
The BBC is fantastic. Go to the US and try Fox for the news - then you'll know what bias really is.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by Henrik's Forehead (U20634)
posted 4 minutes ago
Trump or Clinton? Not even worthy of debate, Clinton hands down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well it kinda is, that's why we've had 265 comments on it you're voting for the evil woman as opposed to the silly man - great
posted on 12/10/16
comment by Kamikaze Blue (U7450)
posted 19 seconds ago
The BBC is fantastic. Go to the US and try Fox for the news - then you'll know what bias really is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
do Fox charge a licence fee? - this is the key part of my frustration
posted on 12/10/16
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Henrik's Forehead (U20634)
posted 4 minutes ago
Trump or Clinton? Not even worthy of debate, Clinton hands down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well it kinda is, that's why we've had 265 comments on ityou're voting for the evil woman as opposed to the silly man - great
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What has Clinton done that is "evil"?
She has made plenty of mistakes and been very naive at times, but "evil"?
If America had any sense, Clinton would be on around 70 percent in the polls at the moment.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 3 minutes ago
you don't have to pay them though in order to read any other newspaper, you dont get it do you?
...........
No I don't get it. You are whining about the BBC being biased in it's coverage, but watch it anyway because you don't have the common sense to watch a news channel that isn't biased.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it's the having to fund it part that i have a problem with and before you say dont have a licence then, you need one to watch other channels aswell so like I say they should remain impartial at all times
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So, lets say you have a valid point with the BBC example.
However, your original argument was that the media as a whole should be unbiased. Thats really not a good idea at all. You need to be able to review how the news events can have an affect on the world. To do that you need people from various different backgrounds giving their perspective.
Without that analysis you can't be well informed.
posted on 12/10/16
it's the having to fund it part that i have a problem with
..............
Tough crap then. Oh and I do agree that the BBC should be impartial.
posted on 12/10/16
The BBC is very bias tbf, if they insist everyone pays license fees they should be neutral.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
because the BBC for example are paid for by the British public by way of licences, we are not giving them the permission to be bias in anyway, their role is to provide the news in an impartial way to the public.
.................
Don't watch the BBC then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont really see it like that, I'm not paying any other media outlet to lie to me, why should the BBC get away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What have the BBC lied to you about?
posted on 12/10/16
If America had any sense, Clinton would be on around 70 percent in the polls at the moment.
..................
Henrick
Your first comment suggested you were leaning the other way.
posted on 12/10/16
Another element of why Trump is a terrible idea is that he's a danger to the very idea of representative democracy. He basically refuses to set out policies (or makes wildly contradictory assertions about his intentions, eg suggesting both that Clinton is a warmonger and that he'll adopt a far more aggressive foreign policy) other than fantasies such as the Great Wall, and invites the public to simply trust him because he's good at leadership and making deals. In other words, don't worry about the details - trust me to do the right thing. This infantilises the voter. It's the territory of dictatorship, not grown up democratic politics. Even in defeat he'll have done great damage to US politics and US political discourse.
posted on 12/10/16
comment by CoutinhosHappyFeet (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by KoemanYouBlues (U21156)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
because the BBC for example are paid for by the British public by way of licences, we are not giving them the permission to be bias in anyway, their role is to provide the news in an impartial way to the public.
.................
Don't watch the BBC then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont really see it like that, I'm not paying any other media outlet to lie to me, why should the BBC get away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What have the BBC lied to you about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They must have carried that interview with Martinez that time he guaranteed Everton champions league qualification
Page 11 of 107
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16