Oscar beat me to it
I did forget option four, though: “OK, I’ll admit that climate change is happening (sometimes), but it’s actually a good thing because I get cold toes in the winter”
It’s just weather being weather.
Just tell me when I’m gonna die Rosso
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 30 seconds ago
Just tell me when I’m gonna die Rosso
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s Nostraduncus when we need him? (Seriously though, whatever happened to Dunc?)
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 30 seconds ago
Just tell me when I’m gonna die Rosso
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s Nostraduncus when we need him? (Seriously though, whatever happened to Dunc?)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Became a miserable obsessed priiick in the last few years and no one was paying any attention to him so facked off.
$100 is almost £82, 2 weeks ago it was about £3 cheaper.
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 30 seconds ago
Just tell me when I’m gonna die Rosso
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s Nostraduncus when we need him? (Seriously though, whatever happened to Dunc?)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Became a miserable obsessed priiick in the last few years and no one was paying any attention to him so facked off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did he reinvent himself as Vengeance?
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 30 seconds ago
Just tell me when I’m gonna die Rosso
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s Nostraduncus when we need him? (Seriously though, whatever happened to Dunc?)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Became a miserable obsessed priiick in the last few years and no one was paying any attention to him so facked off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did he reinvent himself as Vengeance?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No; no way, surely
I really liked Dunc. He was grumpy, funny and had some good stories.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 21 minutes ago
Chart showing global annual temperature anomalies since 1940 (in °C) compared with the pre-industrial period (1850-1900), based on Copernicus data.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg7HGA7WMAADPXo?format=jpg&name=medium
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2024 confirmed as the first year beating 1.5 degrees C globally. The last ten years have been the hottest ten years on record.
The most up-to-date models (built on predictions which have already proven to be pretty facking accurate to date) puts us on track for 2.7 degrees C by 2100 *if all existing pledges are met in full*. 2.7 degrees, as a reminder, would be nothing short of catastrophic for the global ecosystem, biodiversity and mankind.
Meanwhile, those existing pledges… are not close to being met. Last year also saw record worldwide CO2 equivalent emissions, again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s okay… world leaders will soon hold another conference, agree even better targets and then we can all celebrate their amazing work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ll have to fly into this conference with their massive entourages, to enable them to set targets they know they cannot possibly reach and which their populations will not pay for and for which they themselves and their governments will remove any incentivisation to do.
They’ll raise green taxes though and pissss it up against the wall as usual.
Just what is the point?
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 21 minutes ago
Chart showing global annual temperature anomalies since 1940 (in °C) compared with the pre-industrial period (1850-1900), based on Copernicus data.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg7HGA7WMAADPXo?format=jpg&name=medium
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2024 confirmed as the first year beating 1.5 degrees C globally. The last ten years have been the hottest ten years on record.
The most up-to-date models (built on predictions which have already proven to be pretty facking accurate to date) puts us on track for 2.7 degrees C by 2100 *if all existing pledges are met in full*. 2.7 degrees, as a reminder, would be nothing short of catastrophic for the global ecosystem, biodiversity and mankind.
Meanwhile, those existing pledges… are not close to being met. Last year also saw record worldwide CO2 equivalent emissions, again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s okay… world leaders will soon hold another conference, agree even better targets and then we can all celebrate their amazing work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ll have to fly into this conference with their massive entourages, to enable them to set targets they know they cannot possibly reach and which their populations will not pay for and for which they themselves and their governments will remove any incentivisation to do.
They’ll raise green taxes though and pissss it up against the wall as usual.
Just what is the point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no point. Every time we’ve had a huge catastrophic human extinction level concern, it’s turned out to be completely wrong. Every, single, time.
Meanwhile Rosso and his ‘pretty facking accurate’ models can tell China (a country which he has previously hailed as amazing because of its green policies) to stop building a new coal power station every five minutes.
In 2023 they accounted for 95% of the world’s new coal power stations. Four times what they were doing in 2019.
Then we have India, Brazil and all the other countries that need cheap energy to develop and not die & starve.
Why do we think everything is costing so much currently in countries like ours? Cause energy is expensive due to this net zero rubbish which won’t work. What do we think happens when energy is expensive? People die.
We’ll keep being exposed to the ever growing effects of climate change recorded on people’s mobile phones until one day it’s ourselves filming it. Only then will people take it seriously but it’ll be too late.
Energy is expensive because the energy companies are thieving cuuuunts.
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 21 minutes ago
Chart showing global annual temperature anomalies since 1940 (in °C) compared with the pre-industrial period (1850-1900), based on Copernicus data.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg7HGA7WMAADPXo?format=jpg&name=medium
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2024 confirmed as the first year beating 1.5 degrees C globally. The last ten years have been the hottest ten years on record.
The most up-to-date models (built on predictions which have already proven to be pretty facking accurate to date) puts us on track for 2.7 degrees C by 2100 *if all existing pledges are met in full*. 2.7 degrees, as a reminder, would be nothing short of catastrophic for the global ecosystem, biodiversity and mankind.
Meanwhile, those existing pledges… are not close to being met. Last year also saw record worldwide CO2 equivalent emissions, again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s okay… world leaders will soon hold another conference, agree even better targets and then we can all celebrate their amazing work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ll have to fly into this conference with their massive entourages, to enable them to set targets they know they cannot possibly reach and which their populations will not pay for and for which they themselves and their governments will remove any incentivisation to do.
They’ll raise green taxes though and pissss it up against the wall as usual.
Just what is the point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no point. Every time we’ve had a huge catastrophic human extinction level concern, it’s turned out to be completely wrong. Every, single, time.
Meanwhile Rosso and his ‘pretty facking accurate’ models can tell China (a country which he has previously hailed as amazing because of its green policies) to stop building a new coal power station every five minutes.
In 2023 they accounted for 95% of the world’s new coal power stations. Four times what they were doing in 2019.
Then we have India, Brazil and all the other countries that need cheap energy to develop and not die & starve.
Why do we think everything is costing so much currently in countries like ours? Cause energy is expensive due to this net zero rubbish which won’t work. What do we think happens when energy is expensive? People die.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy is expensive because of net zero? Not because of the wars and corporate thuggery?
You fecking genius.
Didn't think Sat Nav would go full in on fossil fuels and anti-net zero, but here we are. Don't look up!
Isn't part of our problem in the UK been we've failed to build any storage? Sure I've read before that even on days wind power is surging we're basically capped because of the lack of infrastructure.
Lack of long term planning constantly screws us. Same way we get floods but in summer we'll have hose pipe bans because we haven't built any new reservoirs in 20 odd years.
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 14 minutes ago
Energy is expensive because the energy companies are thieving cuuuunts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol
comment by Mamba - A tiger does not proclaim his tigritude, he pounces. (U1282)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 21 minutes ago
Chart showing global annual temperature anomalies since 1940 (in °C) compared with the pre-industrial period (1850-1900), based on Copernicus data.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg7HGA7WMAADPXo?format=jpg&name=medium
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2024 confirmed as the first year beating 1.5 degrees C globally. The last ten years have been the hottest ten years on record.
The most up-to-date models (built on predictions which have already proven to be pretty facking accurate to date) puts us on track for 2.7 degrees C by 2100 *if all existing pledges are met in full*. 2.7 degrees, as a reminder, would be nothing short of catastrophic for the global ecosystem, biodiversity and mankind.
Meanwhile, those existing pledges… are not close to being met. Last year also saw record worldwide CO2 equivalent emissions, again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s okay… world leaders will soon hold another conference, agree even better targets and then we can all celebrate their amazing work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ll have to fly into this conference with their massive entourages, to enable them to set targets they know they cannot possibly reach and which their populations will not pay for and for which they themselves and their governments will remove any incentivisation to do.
They’ll raise green taxes though and pissss it up against the wall as usual.
Just what is the point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no point. Every time we’ve had a huge catastrophic human extinction level concern, it’s turned out to be completely wrong. Every, single, time.
Meanwhile Rosso and his ‘pretty facking accurate’ models can tell China (a country which he has previously hailed as amazing because of its green policies) to stop building a new coal power station every five minutes.
In 2023 they accounted for 95% of the world’s new coal power stations. Four times what they were doing in 2019.
Then we have India, Brazil and all the other countries that need cheap energy to develop and not die & starve.
Why do we think everything is costing so much currently in countries like ours? Cause energy is expensive due to this net zero rubbish which won’t work. What do we think happens when energy is expensive? People die.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy is expensive because of net zero? Not because of the wars and corporate thuggery?
You fecking genius.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said the wars aren’t a factor? But tell me genius, when a country stops producing cheaper energy options due to net zero policies, what happens? Oh yeah the price of energy goes up duhhhhh it’s not that difficult for you to understand just too difficult for you to admit.
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 8 minutes ago
Didn't think Sat Nav would go full in on fossil fuels and anti-net zero, but here we are. Don't look up!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve never supported net zero policies Tam. Why on earth would I when they won’t achieve anything other than higher energy prices?
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 minutes ago
Didn't think Sat Nav would go full in on fossil fuels and anti-net zero, but here we are. Don't look up!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tories gonna Tory.
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 minutes ago
Didn't think Sat Nav would go full in on fossil fuels and anti-net zero, but here we are. Don't look up!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tories gonna Tory.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More interesting contributions, well done.
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Mamba - A tiger does not proclaim his tigritude, he pounces. (U1282)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 21 minutes ago
Chart showing global annual temperature anomalies since 1940 (in °C) compared with the pre-industrial period (1850-1900), based on Copernicus data.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg7HGA7WMAADPXo?format=jpg&name=medium
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2024 confirmed as the first year beating 1.5 degrees C globally. The last ten years have been the hottest ten years on record.
The most up-to-date models (built on predictions which have already proven to be pretty facking accurate to date) puts us on track for 2.7 degrees C by 2100 *if all existing pledges are met in full*. 2.7 degrees, as a reminder, would be nothing short of catastrophic for the global ecosystem, biodiversity and mankind.
Meanwhile, those existing pledges… are not close to being met. Last year also saw record worldwide CO2 equivalent emissions, again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s okay… world leaders will soon hold another conference, agree even better targets and then we can all celebrate their amazing work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ll have to fly into this conference with their massive entourages, to enable them to set targets they know they cannot possibly reach and which their populations will not pay for and for which they themselves and their governments will remove any incentivisation to do.
They’ll raise green taxes though and pissss it up against the wall as usual.
Just what is the point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no point. Every time we’ve had a huge catastrophic human extinction level concern, it’s turned out to be completely wrong. Every, single, time.
Meanwhile Rosso and his ‘pretty facking accurate’ models can tell China (a country which he has previously hailed as amazing because of its green policies) to stop building a new coal power station every five minutes.
In 2023 they accounted for 95% of the world’s new coal power stations. Four times what they were doing in 2019.
Then we have India, Brazil and all the other countries that need cheap energy to develop and not die & starve.
Why do we think everything is costing so much currently in countries like ours? Cause energy is expensive due to this net zero rubbish which won’t work. What do we think happens when energy is expensive? People die.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy is expensive because of net zero? Not because of the wars and corporate thuggery?
You fecking genius.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said the wars aren’t a factor? But tell me genius, when a country stops producing cheaper energy options due to net zero policies, what happens? Oh yeah the price of energy goes up duhhhhh it’s not that difficult for you to understand just too difficult for you to admit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s interesting that you mention the wars mamba. Tell me, do you think the net zero policies of Germany made them more or less reliant on Russian energy? How much the UK?
Hmmm let me think now…
Let's just keep on burning the finite fossil fuels for ever and ever, theres nothing we can do so why bother. Let America invade Greenland for its oil what's the biggie?
It's just weather.
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 11 minutes ago
Isn't part of our problem in the UK been we've failed to build any storage? Sure I've read before that even on days wind power is surging we're basically capped because of the lack of infrastructure.
Lack of long term planning constantly screws us. Same way we get floods but in summer we'll have hose pipe bans because we haven't built any new reservoirs in 20 odd years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Storage is an issue but that’s not just a UK thing, pretty sure that’s a problem for most green energy options. That and the availability - less windy year, less sunny years et cetera.
The point is, the main point that no-one will discuss they will just deflect with typical nonsense, is countries like China and developing large nations. Are we to demand that they stop building coal plants to feed their children? To stop producing and growing? If not, then I’m sorry but ain’t nothing gonna change.
Taiwan
China
Australia
South Africa
South Korea
Amongst the highest coal power per capita in the world.
Earlier this year India has the second highest amount of coal plants with around 260. The US has 200 Indonesia 90
China has around 1100 lol…
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 27 minutes ago
Energy is expensive because the energy companies are thieving cuuuunts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus wept
Money, money, money, money.
The worlds on fire and we’re all going to die.
Sign in if you want to comment
Politics Thread
Page 4956 of 5966
4957 | 4958 | 4959 | 4960 | 4961
posted on 10/1/25
Oscar beat me to it
I did forget option four, though: “OK, I’ll admit that climate change is happening (sometimes), but it’s actually a good thing because I get cold toes in the winter”
posted on 10/1/25
It’s just weather being weather.
posted on 10/1/25
Just tell me when I’m gonna die Rosso
posted on 10/1/25
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 30 seconds ago
Just tell me when I’m gonna die Rosso
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s Nostraduncus when we need him? (Seriously though, whatever happened to Dunc?)
posted on 10/1/25
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 30 seconds ago
Just tell me when I’m gonna die Rosso
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s Nostraduncus when we need him? (Seriously though, whatever happened to Dunc?)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Became a miserable obsessed priiick in the last few years and no one was paying any attention to him so facked off.
posted on 10/1/25
$100 is almost £82, 2 weeks ago it was about £3 cheaper.
posted on 10/1/25
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 30 seconds ago
Just tell me when I’m gonna die Rosso
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s Nostraduncus when we need him? (Seriously though, whatever happened to Dunc?)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Became a miserable obsessed priiick in the last few years and no one was paying any attention to him so facked off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did he reinvent himself as Vengeance?
posted on 10/1/25
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 30 seconds ago
Just tell me when I’m gonna die Rosso
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where’s Nostraduncus when we need him? (Seriously though, whatever happened to Dunc?)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Became a miserable obsessed priiick in the last few years and no one was paying any attention to him so facked off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did he reinvent himself as Vengeance?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No; no way, surely
I really liked Dunc. He was grumpy, funny and had some good stories.
posted on 10/1/25
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 21 minutes ago
Chart showing global annual temperature anomalies since 1940 (in °C) compared with the pre-industrial period (1850-1900), based on Copernicus data.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg7HGA7WMAADPXo?format=jpg&name=medium
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2024 confirmed as the first year beating 1.5 degrees C globally. The last ten years have been the hottest ten years on record.
The most up-to-date models (built on predictions which have already proven to be pretty facking accurate to date) puts us on track for 2.7 degrees C by 2100 *if all existing pledges are met in full*. 2.7 degrees, as a reminder, would be nothing short of catastrophic for the global ecosystem, biodiversity and mankind.
Meanwhile, those existing pledges… are not close to being met. Last year also saw record worldwide CO2 equivalent emissions, again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s okay… world leaders will soon hold another conference, agree even better targets and then we can all celebrate their amazing work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ll have to fly into this conference with their massive entourages, to enable them to set targets they know they cannot possibly reach and which their populations will not pay for and for which they themselves and their governments will remove any incentivisation to do.
They’ll raise green taxes though and pissss it up against the wall as usual.
Just what is the point?
posted on 10/1/25
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 21 minutes ago
Chart showing global annual temperature anomalies since 1940 (in °C) compared with the pre-industrial period (1850-1900), based on Copernicus data.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg7HGA7WMAADPXo?format=jpg&name=medium
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2024 confirmed as the first year beating 1.5 degrees C globally. The last ten years have been the hottest ten years on record.
The most up-to-date models (built on predictions which have already proven to be pretty facking accurate to date) puts us on track for 2.7 degrees C by 2100 *if all existing pledges are met in full*. 2.7 degrees, as a reminder, would be nothing short of catastrophic for the global ecosystem, biodiversity and mankind.
Meanwhile, those existing pledges… are not close to being met. Last year also saw record worldwide CO2 equivalent emissions, again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s okay… world leaders will soon hold another conference, agree even better targets and then we can all celebrate their amazing work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ll have to fly into this conference with their massive entourages, to enable them to set targets they know they cannot possibly reach and which their populations will not pay for and for which they themselves and their governments will remove any incentivisation to do.
They’ll raise green taxes though and pissss it up against the wall as usual.
Just what is the point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no point. Every time we’ve had a huge catastrophic human extinction level concern, it’s turned out to be completely wrong. Every, single, time.
Meanwhile Rosso and his ‘pretty facking accurate’ models can tell China (a country which he has previously hailed as amazing because of its green policies) to stop building a new coal power station every five minutes.
In 2023 they accounted for 95% of the world’s new coal power stations. Four times what they were doing in 2019.
Then we have India, Brazil and all the other countries that need cheap energy to develop and not die & starve.
Why do we think everything is costing so much currently in countries like ours? Cause energy is expensive due to this net zero rubbish which won’t work. What do we think happens when energy is expensive? People die.
posted on 10/1/25
We’ll keep being exposed to the ever growing effects of climate change recorded on people’s mobile phones until one day it’s ourselves filming it. Only then will people take it seriously but it’ll be too late.
posted on 10/1/25
Energy is expensive because the energy companies are thieving cuuuunts.
posted on 10/1/25
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 21 minutes ago
Chart showing global annual temperature anomalies since 1940 (in °C) compared with the pre-industrial period (1850-1900), based on Copernicus data.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg7HGA7WMAADPXo?format=jpg&name=medium
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2024 confirmed as the first year beating 1.5 degrees C globally. The last ten years have been the hottest ten years on record.
The most up-to-date models (built on predictions which have already proven to be pretty facking accurate to date) puts us on track for 2.7 degrees C by 2100 *if all existing pledges are met in full*. 2.7 degrees, as a reminder, would be nothing short of catastrophic for the global ecosystem, biodiversity and mankind.
Meanwhile, those existing pledges… are not close to being met. Last year also saw record worldwide CO2 equivalent emissions, again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s okay… world leaders will soon hold another conference, agree even better targets and then we can all celebrate their amazing work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ll have to fly into this conference with their massive entourages, to enable them to set targets they know they cannot possibly reach and which their populations will not pay for and for which they themselves and their governments will remove any incentivisation to do.
They’ll raise green taxes though and pissss it up against the wall as usual.
Just what is the point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no point. Every time we’ve had a huge catastrophic human extinction level concern, it’s turned out to be completely wrong. Every, single, time.
Meanwhile Rosso and his ‘pretty facking accurate’ models can tell China (a country which he has previously hailed as amazing because of its green policies) to stop building a new coal power station every five minutes.
In 2023 they accounted for 95% of the world’s new coal power stations. Four times what they were doing in 2019.
Then we have India, Brazil and all the other countries that need cheap energy to develop and not die & starve.
Why do we think everything is costing so much currently in countries like ours? Cause energy is expensive due to this net zero rubbish which won’t work. What do we think happens when energy is expensive? People die.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy is expensive because of net zero? Not because of the wars and corporate thuggery?
You fecking genius.
posted on 10/1/25
Didn't think Sat Nav would go full in on fossil fuels and anti-net zero, but here we are. Don't look up!
posted on 10/1/25
Isn't part of our problem in the UK been we've failed to build any storage? Sure I've read before that even on days wind power is surging we're basically capped because of the lack of infrastructure.
Lack of long term planning constantly screws us. Same way we get floods but in summer we'll have hose pipe bans because we haven't built any new reservoirs in 20 odd years.
posted on 10/1/25
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 14 minutes ago
Energy is expensive because the energy companies are thieving cuuuunts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol
posted on 10/1/25
comment by Mamba - A tiger does not proclaim his tigritude, he pounces. (U1282)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 21 minutes ago
Chart showing global annual temperature anomalies since 1940 (in °C) compared with the pre-industrial period (1850-1900), based on Copernicus data.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg7HGA7WMAADPXo?format=jpg&name=medium
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2024 confirmed as the first year beating 1.5 degrees C globally. The last ten years have been the hottest ten years on record.
The most up-to-date models (built on predictions which have already proven to be pretty facking accurate to date) puts us on track for 2.7 degrees C by 2100 *if all existing pledges are met in full*. 2.7 degrees, as a reminder, would be nothing short of catastrophic for the global ecosystem, biodiversity and mankind.
Meanwhile, those existing pledges… are not close to being met. Last year also saw record worldwide CO2 equivalent emissions, again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s okay… world leaders will soon hold another conference, agree even better targets and then we can all celebrate their amazing work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ll have to fly into this conference with their massive entourages, to enable them to set targets they know they cannot possibly reach and which their populations will not pay for and for which they themselves and their governments will remove any incentivisation to do.
They’ll raise green taxes though and pissss it up against the wall as usual.
Just what is the point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no point. Every time we’ve had a huge catastrophic human extinction level concern, it’s turned out to be completely wrong. Every, single, time.
Meanwhile Rosso and his ‘pretty facking accurate’ models can tell China (a country which he has previously hailed as amazing because of its green policies) to stop building a new coal power station every five minutes.
In 2023 they accounted for 95% of the world’s new coal power stations. Four times what they were doing in 2019.
Then we have India, Brazil and all the other countries that need cheap energy to develop and not die & starve.
Why do we think everything is costing so much currently in countries like ours? Cause energy is expensive due to this net zero rubbish which won’t work. What do we think happens when energy is expensive? People die.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy is expensive because of net zero? Not because of the wars and corporate thuggery?
You fecking genius.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said the wars aren’t a factor? But tell me genius, when a country stops producing cheaper energy options due to net zero policies, what happens? Oh yeah the price of energy goes up duhhhhh it’s not that difficult for you to understand just too difficult for you to admit.
posted on 10/1/25
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 8 minutes ago
Didn't think Sat Nav would go full in on fossil fuels and anti-net zero, but here we are. Don't look up!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve never supported net zero policies Tam. Why on earth would I when they won’t achieve anything other than higher energy prices?
posted on 10/1/25
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 minutes ago
Didn't think Sat Nav would go full in on fossil fuels and anti-net zero, but here we are. Don't look up!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tories gonna Tory.
posted on 10/1/25
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 minutes ago
Didn't think Sat Nav would go full in on fossil fuels and anti-net zero, but here we are. Don't look up!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tories gonna Tory.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More interesting contributions, well done.
posted on 10/1/25
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Mamba - A tiger does not proclaim his tigritude, he pounces. (U1282)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by RRRU-ben a-moo-REENG (U17054)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Maximus Decimus Meridius (U11781)
posted 21 minutes ago
Chart showing global annual temperature anomalies since 1940 (in °C) compared with the pre-industrial period (1850-1900), based on Copernicus data.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg7HGA7WMAADPXo?format=jpg&name=medium
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2024 confirmed as the first year beating 1.5 degrees C globally. The last ten years have been the hottest ten years on record.
The most up-to-date models (built on predictions which have already proven to be pretty facking accurate to date) puts us on track for 2.7 degrees C by 2100 *if all existing pledges are met in full*. 2.7 degrees, as a reminder, would be nothing short of catastrophic for the global ecosystem, biodiversity and mankind.
Meanwhile, those existing pledges… are not close to being met. Last year also saw record worldwide CO2 equivalent emissions, again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s okay… world leaders will soon hold another conference, agree even better targets and then we can all celebrate their amazing work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ll have to fly into this conference with their massive entourages, to enable them to set targets they know they cannot possibly reach and which their populations will not pay for and for which they themselves and their governments will remove any incentivisation to do.
They’ll raise green taxes though and pissss it up against the wall as usual.
Just what is the point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no point. Every time we’ve had a huge catastrophic human extinction level concern, it’s turned out to be completely wrong. Every, single, time.
Meanwhile Rosso and his ‘pretty facking accurate’ models can tell China (a country which he has previously hailed as amazing because of its green policies) to stop building a new coal power station every five minutes.
In 2023 they accounted for 95% of the world’s new coal power stations. Four times what they were doing in 2019.
Then we have India, Brazil and all the other countries that need cheap energy to develop and not die & starve.
Why do we think everything is costing so much currently in countries like ours? Cause energy is expensive due to this net zero rubbish which won’t work. What do we think happens when energy is expensive? People die.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy is expensive because of net zero? Not because of the wars and corporate thuggery?
You fecking genius.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said the wars aren’t a factor? But tell me genius, when a country stops producing cheaper energy options due to net zero policies, what happens? Oh yeah the price of energy goes up duhhhhh it’s not that difficult for you to understand just too difficult for you to admit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s interesting that you mention the wars mamba. Tell me, do you think the net zero policies of Germany made them more or less reliant on Russian energy? How much the UK?
Hmmm let me think now…
posted on 10/1/25
Let's just keep on burning the finite fossil fuels for ever and ever, theres nothing we can do so why bother. Let America invade Greenland for its oil what's the biggie?
It's just weather.
posted on 10/1/25
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 11 minutes ago
Isn't part of our problem in the UK been we've failed to build any storage? Sure I've read before that even on days wind power is surging we're basically capped because of the lack of infrastructure.
Lack of long term planning constantly screws us. Same way we get floods but in summer we'll have hose pipe bans because we haven't built any new reservoirs in 20 odd years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Storage is an issue but that’s not just a UK thing, pretty sure that’s a problem for most green energy options. That and the availability - less windy year, less sunny years et cetera.
The point is, the main point that no-one will discuss they will just deflect with typical nonsense, is countries like China and developing large nations. Are we to demand that they stop building coal plants to feed their children? To stop producing and growing? If not, then I’m sorry but ain’t nothing gonna change.
Taiwan
China
Australia
South Africa
South Korea
Amongst the highest coal power per capita in the world.
Earlier this year India has the second highest amount of coal plants with around 260. The US has 200 Indonesia 90
China has around 1100 lol…
posted on 10/1/25
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 27 minutes ago
Energy is expensive because the energy companies are thieving cuuuunts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus wept
posted on 10/1/25
Money, money, money, money.
The worlds on fire and we’re all going to die.
Page 4956 of 5966
4957 | 4958 | 4959 | 4960 | 4961