Can anyone remind me whether it Robbing who told us around December 2017 that the results in the first half of that season constituted empirical evidence that Liverpool would finish higher than United in the league? I remember the poster in question digging in with similar stubborn resistance to logic on that thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes that was me. Well kind of. I was right too. I missed your apology though.
...................
Were you right?
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
Well there are two sites for reference from what I can tell. I gotta say that saying physioroom, the online retailer, prioritises tracking injuries is a bit of a leap but fair dos.
Herrera was just getting up to speed half the time for five years is all.
----------------
Nope, for 2 years he was oddly out of Jose's favour, despite being our best player whilst playing in DM - where you don't think he is very good. Over the course of the other 3 seasons he averaged 30 starts, despite numerous injuries (more than twice as many as you had stated).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Twice as many as transfermarket stated actually. Numerous is hyperbole as you well know which smacks of trying to reinforce a weak point.
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 5 seconds ago
Can anyone remind me whether it Robbing who told us around December 2017 that the results in the first half of that season constituted empirical evidence that Liverpool would finish higher than United in the league? I remember the poster in question digging in with similar stubborn resistance to logic on that thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes that was me. Well kind of. I was right too. I missed your apology though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was awkward more than anything else that you believed that historic results constituted empirical data about the future. Still, if we take a look at the empirical data from the second half of the season and find it confirms your assertion (in other words, if your answer was correct even though your working out was wrong), I'll be generous enough to offer that apology.
The sale of sports products. I do not regard it as a specialist sports site. No-one does.
...............
Well the title of Premier League Physio Room would suggest it is a bit more knowledgeable than the transfer league title you put up.
This would explain why your info was duff.
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 5 seconds ago
Can anyone remind me whether it Robbing who told us around December 2017 that the results in the first half of that season constituted empirical evidence that Liverpool would finish higher than United in the league? I remember the poster in question digging in with similar stubborn resistance to logic on that thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes that was me. Well kind of. I was right too. I missed your apology though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was awkward more than anything else that you believed that historic results constituted empirical data about the future. Still, if we take a look at the empirical data from the second half of the season and find it confirms your assertion (in other words, if your answer was correct even though your working out was wrong), I'll be generous enough to offer that apology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't remember what season it was tbh but whether the use of the word empirical was wrong or not I don't think looking at form is that mental. I imagine you gave a haughty laugh over your pimps though.
Do you fancy posting anything about football? Like ever?
And by pimps I mean pimms. Maybe both. Dunno.
I can't remember what season it was tbh
...............
You mean you can't count from December 2017.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
The sale of sports products. I do not regard it as a specialist sports site. No-one does.
...............
Well the title of Premier League Physio Room would suggest it is a bit more knowledgeable than the transfer league title you put up.
This would explain why your info was duff.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No that's a section of the online retailers website.
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
Well there are two sites for reference from what I can tell. I gotta say that saying physioroom, the online retailer, prioritises tracking injuries is a bit of a leap but fair dos.
Herrera was just getting up to speed half the time for five years is all.
----------------
Nope, for 2 years he was oddly out of Jose's favour, despite being our best player whilst playing in DM - where you don't think he is very good. Over the course of the other 3 seasons he averaged 30 starts, despite numerous injuries (more than twice as many as you had stated).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Twice as many as transfermarket stated actually. Numerous is hyperbole as you well know which smacks of trying to reinforce a weak point.
---------------
Its not a weak point. Due to your lack of knowledge, you based your whole argument on date from a website that tracks transfers. You now know that your were wrong to do so.
If you want to be more exact, he had 8 injuries in his first 2 seasons, which was the only 2 seasons that he didn't play many games where he wasn't oddly dropped by Jose.
Fine your source is the bestest and Herrera is really good.
No that's a section of the online retailers website.
.....................
What does it list on that website, was it player injuries per chance?
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 38 seconds ago
No that's a section of the online retailers website.
.....................
What does it list on that website, was it player injuries per chance?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a fvcking news section on a retailers website. Its doesnt have any more credibility than anything else. Im not surprised that a simple html cofe is enough to tie you up though.
Its a fvcking news section on a retailers website.
..............
Does it list player injuries? This isn't a trick question.
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fine your source is the bestest and Herrera is really good.
-----------------------------
As I have said, I have always found that website to be reliable in regards to injuries. But as you know, if you doubt how accurate the data is, you could do a quick google for stories relating to those injuries around the times provided.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 5 seconds ago
Its a fvcking news section on a retailers website.
..............
Does it list player injuries? This isn't a trick question.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it does as do others. That's the point. If Elvis thinks that more credible then fine. Same with you.
Perhaps they have a dedicated team.
Transfermarket is very very thorough and literally a specialist football site. Physioroom isnt.
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 5 seconds ago
Can anyone remind me whether it Robbing who told us around December 2017 that the results in the first half of that season constituted empirical evidence that Liverpool would finish higher than United in the league? I remember the poster in question digging in with similar stubborn resistance to logic on that thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes that was me. Well kind of. I was right too. I missed your apology though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was awkward more than anything else that you believed that historic results constituted empirical data about the future. Still, if we take a look at the empirical data from the second half of the season and find it confirms your assertion (in other words, if your answer was correct even though your working out was wrong), I'll be generous enough to offer that apology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't remember what season it was tbh but whether the use of the word empirical was wrong or not I don't think looking at form is that mental. I imagine you gave a haughty laugh over your pimps though.
Do you fancy posting anything about football? Like ever?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You spent about 90 posts defending the use of 'empirical' back on the original thread, which is strange for a salt of the earth type who would rather leave correct things like using words to mean what they actually mean to haughty Pimms drinkers.
As for talking about football, that tends to be the outcome when our threads aren't invaded by rival fans who want playground-level debate (and as others have commented, you're often better than that) or political extremists.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fine your source is the bestest and Herrera is really good.
-----------------------------
As I have said, I have always found that website to be reliable in regards to injuries. But as you know, if you doubt how accurate the data is, you could do a quick google for stories relating to those injuries around the times provided.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Likewise with transfer market.
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 5 seconds ago
Can anyone remind me whether it Robbing who told us around December 2017 that the results in the first half of that season constituted empirical evidence that Liverpool would finish higher than United in the league? I remember the poster in question digging in with similar stubborn resistance to logic on that thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes that was me. Well kind of. I was right too. I missed your apology though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was awkward more than anything else that you believed that historic results constituted empirical data about the future. Still, if we take a look at the empirical data from the second half of the season and find it confirms your assertion (in other words, if your answer was correct even though your working out was wrong), I'll be generous enough to offer that apology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't remember what season it was tbh but whether the use of the word empirical was wrong or not I don't think looking at form is that mental. I imagine you gave a haughty laugh over your pimps though.
Do you fancy posting anything about football? Like ever?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You spent about 90 posts defending the use of 'empirical' back on the original thread, which is strange for a salt of the earth type who would rather leave correct things like using words to mean what they actually mean to haughty Pimms drinkers.
As for talking about football, that tends to be the outcome when our threads aren't invaded by rival fans who want playground-level debate (and as others have commented, you're often better than that) or political extremists.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Saying Ander Herrera isnt great amounts to play ground level debate just about sums you up.
Yes it does
.............
Finally.
So, it would be likely to be a better source what with it being sport injury related, than the transfer league, who we already know got his injury against Liverpool wrong.
Let me know when the penny drops.
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fine your source is the bestest and Herrera is really good.
-----------------------------
As I have said, I have always found that website to be reliable in regards to injuries. But as you know, if you doubt how accurate the data is, you could do a quick google for stories relating to those injuries around the times provided.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Likewise with transfer market.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which apparently proved that Herrera had 'literally never' had a hamstring injury. The data you are relying on was quickly shown to have several inaccuracies. As far as I can see, no one has pointed out any mistakes in the Physio Room info; I've just heard some excitable squealing about the company that runs it.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 23 seconds ago
Yes it does
.............
Finally.
So, it would be likely to be a better source what with it being sport injury related, than the transfer league, who we already know got his injury against Liverpool wrong.
Let me know when the penny drops.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it's not likely to be more accurate at all. It's more likely just a casual bolt on to increase traffic.
You spent about 90 posts defending the use of 'empirical' back on the original thread, which is strange for a salt of the earth type who would rather leave correct things like using words to mean what they actually mean to haughty Pimms drinkers.
As for talking about football, that tends to be the outcome when our threads aren't invaded by rival fans who want playground-level debate (and as others have commented, you're often better than that) or political extremists.
..................
And if it was Dec 17 he was wrong anyway.
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fine your source is the bestest and Herrera is really good.
-----------------------------
As I have said, I have always found that website to be reliable in regards to injuries. But as you know, if you doubt how accurate the data is, you could do a quick google for stories relating to those injuries around the times provided.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Likewise with transfer market.
------------------
If I could be bothered Robbing, I could register with transfermarket and update Herrera's injury history myself. You know, like wiki?
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fine your source is the bestest and Herrera is really good.
-----------------------------
As I have said, I have always found that website to be reliable in regards to injuries. But as you know, if you doubt how accurate the data is, you could do a quick google for stories relating to those injuries around the times provided.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Likewise with transfer market.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which apparently proved that Herrera had 'literally never' had a hamstring injury. The data you are relying on was quickly shown to have several inaccuracies. As far as I can see, no one has pointed out any mistakes in the Physio Room info; I've just heard some excitable squealing about the company that runs it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Excitable squealing
Bit of a melt really aren't you.
Yes I used transfer market. Arrest me. You listed some red tops. It's by the by really.
Sign in if you want to comment
Ander Herrera
Page 10 of 12
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
posted on 10/6/19
Can anyone remind me whether it Robbing who told us around December 2017 that the results in the first half of that season constituted empirical evidence that Liverpool would finish higher than United in the league? I remember the poster in question digging in with similar stubborn resistance to logic on that thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes that was me. Well kind of. I was right too. I missed your apology though.
...................
Were you right?
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
Well there are two sites for reference from what I can tell. I gotta say that saying physioroom, the online retailer, prioritises tracking injuries is a bit of a leap but fair dos.
Herrera was just getting up to speed half the time for five years is all.
----------------
Nope, for 2 years he was oddly out of Jose's favour, despite being our best player whilst playing in DM - where you don't think he is very good. Over the course of the other 3 seasons he averaged 30 starts, despite numerous injuries (more than twice as many as you had stated).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Twice as many as transfermarket stated actually. Numerous is hyperbole as you well know which smacks of trying to reinforce a weak point.
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 5 seconds ago
Can anyone remind me whether it Robbing who told us around December 2017 that the results in the first half of that season constituted empirical evidence that Liverpool would finish higher than United in the league? I remember the poster in question digging in with similar stubborn resistance to logic on that thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes that was me. Well kind of. I was right too. I missed your apology though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was awkward more than anything else that you believed that historic results constituted empirical data about the future. Still, if we take a look at the empirical data from the second half of the season and find it confirms your assertion (in other words, if your answer was correct even though your working out was wrong), I'll be generous enough to offer that apology.
posted on 10/6/19
The sale of sports products. I do not regard it as a specialist sports site. No-one does.
...............
Well the title of Premier League Physio Room would suggest it is a bit more knowledgeable than the transfer league title you put up.
This would explain why your info was duff.
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 5 seconds ago
Can anyone remind me whether it Robbing who told us around December 2017 that the results in the first half of that season constituted empirical evidence that Liverpool would finish higher than United in the league? I remember the poster in question digging in with similar stubborn resistance to logic on that thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes that was me. Well kind of. I was right too. I missed your apology though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was awkward more than anything else that you believed that historic results constituted empirical data about the future. Still, if we take a look at the empirical data from the second half of the season and find it confirms your assertion (in other words, if your answer was correct even though your working out was wrong), I'll be generous enough to offer that apology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't remember what season it was tbh but whether the use of the word empirical was wrong or not I don't think looking at form is that mental. I imagine you gave a haughty laugh over your pimps though.
Do you fancy posting anything about football? Like ever?
posted on 10/6/19
And by pimps I mean pimms. Maybe both. Dunno.
posted on 10/6/19
I can't remember what season it was tbh
...............
You mean you can't count from December 2017.
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
The sale of sports products. I do not regard it as a specialist sports site. No-one does.
...............
Well the title of Premier League Physio Room would suggest it is a bit more knowledgeable than the transfer league title you put up.
This would explain why your info was duff.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No that's a section of the online retailers website.
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
Well there are two sites for reference from what I can tell. I gotta say that saying physioroom, the online retailer, prioritises tracking injuries is a bit of a leap but fair dos.
Herrera was just getting up to speed half the time for five years is all.
----------------
Nope, for 2 years he was oddly out of Jose's favour, despite being our best player whilst playing in DM - where you don't think he is very good. Over the course of the other 3 seasons he averaged 30 starts, despite numerous injuries (more than twice as many as you had stated).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Twice as many as transfermarket stated actually. Numerous is hyperbole as you well know which smacks of trying to reinforce a weak point.
---------------
Its not a weak point. Due to your lack of knowledge, you based your whole argument on date from a website that tracks transfers. You now know that your were wrong to do so.
If you want to be more exact, he had 8 injuries in his first 2 seasons, which was the only 2 seasons that he didn't play many games where he wasn't oddly dropped by Jose.
posted on 10/6/19
Fine your source is the bestest and Herrera is really good.
posted on 10/6/19
No that's a section of the online retailers website.
.....................
What does it list on that website, was it player injuries per chance?
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 38 seconds ago
No that's a section of the online retailers website.
.....................
What does it list on that website, was it player injuries per chance?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a fvcking news section on a retailers website. Its doesnt have any more credibility than anything else. Im not surprised that a simple html cofe is enough to tie you up though.
posted on 10/6/19
Its a fvcking news section on a retailers website.
..............
Does it list player injuries? This isn't a trick question.
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fine your source is the bestest and Herrera is really good.
-----------------------------
As I have said, I have always found that website to be reliable in regards to injuries. But as you know, if you doubt how accurate the data is, you could do a quick google for stories relating to those injuries around the times provided.
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 5 seconds ago
Its a fvcking news section on a retailers website.
..............
Does it list player injuries? This isn't a trick question.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it does as do others. That's the point. If Elvis thinks that more credible then fine. Same with you.
Perhaps they have a dedicated team.
Transfermarket is very very thorough and literally a specialist football site. Physioroom isnt.
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 5 seconds ago
Can anyone remind me whether it Robbing who told us around December 2017 that the results in the first half of that season constituted empirical evidence that Liverpool would finish higher than United in the league? I remember the poster in question digging in with similar stubborn resistance to logic on that thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes that was me. Well kind of. I was right too. I missed your apology though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was awkward more than anything else that you believed that historic results constituted empirical data about the future. Still, if we take a look at the empirical data from the second half of the season and find it confirms your assertion (in other words, if your answer was correct even though your working out was wrong), I'll be generous enough to offer that apology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't remember what season it was tbh but whether the use of the word empirical was wrong or not I don't think looking at form is that mental. I imagine you gave a haughty laugh over your pimps though.
Do you fancy posting anything about football? Like ever?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You spent about 90 posts defending the use of 'empirical' back on the original thread, which is strange for a salt of the earth type who would rather leave correct things like using words to mean what they actually mean to haughty Pimms drinkers.
As for talking about football, that tends to be the outcome when our threads aren't invaded by rival fans who want playground-level debate (and as others have commented, you're often better than that) or political extremists.
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fine your source is the bestest and Herrera is really good.
-----------------------------
As I have said, I have always found that website to be reliable in regards to injuries. But as you know, if you doubt how accurate the data is, you could do a quick google for stories relating to those injuries around the times provided.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Likewise with transfer market.
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 5 seconds ago
Can anyone remind me whether it Robbing who told us around December 2017 that the results in the first half of that season constituted empirical evidence that Liverpool would finish higher than United in the league? I remember the poster in question digging in with similar stubborn resistance to logic on that thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes that was me. Well kind of. I was right too. I missed your apology though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was awkward more than anything else that you believed that historic results constituted empirical data about the future. Still, if we take a look at the empirical data from the second half of the season and find it confirms your assertion (in other words, if your answer was correct even though your working out was wrong), I'll be generous enough to offer that apology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't remember what season it was tbh but whether the use of the word empirical was wrong or not I don't think looking at form is that mental. I imagine you gave a haughty laugh over your pimps though.
Do you fancy posting anything about football? Like ever?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You spent about 90 posts defending the use of 'empirical' back on the original thread, which is strange for a salt of the earth type who would rather leave correct things like using words to mean what they actually mean to haughty Pimms drinkers.
As for talking about football, that tends to be the outcome when our threads aren't invaded by rival fans who want playground-level debate (and as others have commented, you're often better than that) or political extremists.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Saying Ander Herrera isnt great amounts to play ground level debate just about sums you up.
posted on 10/6/19
Invaded btw
posted on 10/6/19
Yes it does
.............
Finally.
So, it would be likely to be a better source what with it being sport injury related, than the transfer league, who we already know got his injury against Liverpool wrong.
Let me know when the penny drops.
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fine your source is the bestest and Herrera is really good.
-----------------------------
As I have said, I have always found that website to be reliable in regards to injuries. But as you know, if you doubt how accurate the data is, you could do a quick google for stories relating to those injuries around the times provided.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Likewise with transfer market.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which apparently proved that Herrera had 'literally never' had a hamstring injury. The data you are relying on was quickly shown to have several inaccuracies. As far as I can see, no one has pointed out any mistakes in the Physio Room info; I've just heard some excitable squealing about the company that runs it.
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 23 seconds ago
Yes it does
.............
Finally.
So, it would be likely to be a better source what with it being sport injury related, than the transfer league, who we already know got his injury against Liverpool wrong.
Let me know when the penny drops.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it's not likely to be more accurate at all. It's more likely just a casual bolt on to increase traffic.
posted on 10/6/19
You spent about 90 posts defending the use of 'empirical' back on the original thread, which is strange for a salt of the earth type who would rather leave correct things like using words to mean what they actually mean to haughty Pimms drinkers.
As for talking about football, that tends to be the outcome when our threads aren't invaded by rival fans who want playground-level debate (and as others have commented, you're often better than that) or political extremists.
..................
And if it was Dec 17 he was wrong anyway.
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fine your source is the bestest and Herrera is really good.
-----------------------------
As I have said, I have always found that website to be reliable in regards to injuries. But as you know, if you doubt how accurate the data is, you could do a quick google for stories relating to those injuries around the times provided.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Likewise with transfer market.
------------------
If I could be bothered Robbing, I could register with transfermarket and update Herrera's injury history myself. You know, like wiki?
posted on 10/6/19
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fine your source is the bestest and Herrera is really good.
-----------------------------
As I have said, I have always found that website to be reliable in regards to injuries. But as you know, if you doubt how accurate the data is, you could do a quick google for stories relating to those injuries around the times provided.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Likewise with transfer market.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which apparently proved that Herrera had 'literally never' had a hamstring injury. The data you are relying on was quickly shown to have several inaccuracies. As far as I can see, no one has pointed out any mistakes in the Physio Room info; I've just heard some excitable squealing about the company that runs it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Excitable squealing
Bit of a melt really aren't you.
Yes I used transfer market. Arrest me. You listed some red tops. It's by the by really.
Page 10 of 12
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12