both 1917 and hacksaw ridge are both better than the borefest of dunkirk.
Great video though OP, keep it up mate
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Watched Dunkirk again...Great movie! Like Bluey said, the tension OMG!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Blue in the face (U22288)
posted 7 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 45 minutes ago
both 1917 and hacksaw ridge are both better than the borefest of dunkirk.
Great video though OP, keep it up mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree completely.
A few scenes aside, Hacksaw Ridge was pretty rubbish, a much inferior Gibson film compared to the brilliantly delirious Apocalypto.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NPE
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 12 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Blue in the face (U22288)
posted 7 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 45 minutes ago
both 1917 and hacksaw ridge are both better than the borefest of dunkirk.
Great video though OP, keep it up mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree completely.
A few scenes aside, Hacksaw Ridge was pretty rubbish, a much inferior Gibson film compared to the brilliantly delirious Apocalypto.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NPE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hacksaw ridge was good, even better when you realise the guy actually did that for real- amazing.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Blue in the face (U22288)
posted 10 seconds ago
Meh, it was like a Hallmark movie for the most part. Had a couple of well directed intense moments on the battlefield, but I want more from a director like Gibson.
p
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough, horses for courses, I see inglorious mentioned a lot, as a good film, but it’s typical Tarantino mindless waffle for the sake of it. Dislikable characters, (made me want the Germans to win ffs!) but has some decent tense scenes. I might give it a rewatch to see if it grows on me, but I really hate tarrantino’s mindless try-to-hard-but-goes-nowhere filler dialogue. I suppose atleast inglorious has less of that than most of his movies, hateful 8 for example was sheer boredom.
comment by Blue in the face (U22288)
posted 31 minutes ago
Meh, it was like a Hallmark movie for the most part. Had a couple of well directed intense moments on the battlefield, but I want more from a director like Gibson.
p
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was fantastic. Character driven. True story. Intense. Great film imo.
I would take platoon over Dunkirk if I’m honest, brilliant film.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Blue in the face (U22288)
posted 31 minutes ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baztard (U19119)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
comment by Blue in the face (U22288)
posted 10 seconds ago
Meh, it was like a Hallmark movie for the most part. Had a couple of well directed intense moments on the battlefield, but I want more from a director like Gibson.
p
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough, horses for courses, I see inglorious mentioned a lot, as a good film, but it’s typical Tarantino mindless waffle for the sake of it. Dislikable characters, (made me want the Germans to win ffs!) but has some decent tense scenes. I might give it a rewatch to see if it grows on me, but I really hate tarrantino’s mindless try-to-hard-but-goes-nowhere filler dialogue. I suppose atleast inglorious has less of that than most of his movies, hateful 8 for example was sheer boredom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Respectfully disagreeI consider Tarantino’s work to be near flawless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough, I consider it to be very flawed and overindulgent. Each to their own.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Both are boring as fck !
1917 is pretty fcking dreadful
Too often the main character is a complete douche
Whats happening here then?!
Both boring as fck .. Dreadful?!!! man, you a hard guy to please...
Sign in if you want to comment
Dunkirk vs 1917
Page 2 of 2
posted on 9/4/20
both 1917 and hacksaw ridge are both better than the borefest of dunkirk.
Great video though OP, keep it up mate
posted on 9/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/4/20
Watched Dunkirk again...Great movie! Like Bluey said, the tension OMG!
posted on 9/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/4/20
comment by Blue in the face (U22288)
posted 7 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 45 minutes ago
both 1917 and hacksaw ridge are both better than the borefest of dunkirk.
Great video though OP, keep it up mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree completely.
A few scenes aside, Hacksaw Ridge was pretty rubbish, a much inferior Gibson film compared to the brilliantly delirious Apocalypto.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NPE
posted on 10/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/4/20
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 12 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Blue in the face (U22288)
posted 7 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 45 minutes ago
both 1917 and hacksaw ridge are both better than the borefest of dunkirk.
Great video though OP, keep it up mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree completely.
A few scenes aside, Hacksaw Ridge was pretty rubbish, a much inferior Gibson film compared to the brilliantly delirious Apocalypto.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NPE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hacksaw ridge was good, even better when you realise the guy actually did that for real- amazing.
posted on 10/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/4/20
comment by Blue in the face (U22288)
posted 10 seconds ago
Meh, it was like a Hallmark movie for the most part. Had a couple of well directed intense moments on the battlefield, but I want more from a director like Gibson.
p
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough, horses for courses, I see inglorious mentioned a lot, as a good film, but it’s typical Tarantino mindless waffle for the sake of it. Dislikable characters, (made me want the Germans to win ffs!) but has some decent tense scenes. I might give it a rewatch to see if it grows on me, but I really hate tarrantino’s mindless try-to-hard-but-goes-nowhere filler dialogue. I suppose atleast inglorious has less of that than most of his movies, hateful 8 for example was sheer boredom.
posted on 10/4/20
comment by Blue in the face (U22288)
posted 31 minutes ago
Meh, it was like a Hallmark movie for the most part. Had a couple of well directed intense moments on the battlefield, but I want more from a director like Gibson.
p
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was fantastic. Character driven. True story. Intense. Great film imo.
posted on 10/4/20
I would take platoon over Dunkirk if I’m honest, brilliant film.
posted on 10/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/4/20
comment by Blue in the face (U22288)
posted 31 minutes ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baztard (U19119)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
comment by Blue in the face (U22288)
posted 10 seconds ago
Meh, it was like a Hallmark movie for the most part. Had a couple of well directed intense moments on the battlefield, but I want more from a director like Gibson.
p
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough, horses for courses, I see inglorious mentioned a lot, as a good film, but it’s typical Tarantino mindless waffle for the sake of it. Dislikable characters, (made me want the Germans to win ffs!) but has some decent tense scenes. I might give it a rewatch to see if it grows on me, but I really hate tarrantino’s mindless try-to-hard-but-goes-nowhere filler dialogue. I suppose atleast inglorious has less of that than most of his movies, hateful 8 for example was sheer boredom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Respectfully disagreeI consider Tarantino’s work to be near flawless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough, I consider it to be very flawed and overindulgent. Each to their own.
posted on 10/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/4/20
Both are boring as fck !
1917 is pretty fcking dreadful
Too often the main character is a complete douche
posted on 11/4/20
Whats happening here then?!
Both boring as fck .. Dreadful?!!! man, you a hard guy to please...
Page 2 of 2