Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Poolmyfinger - CHAMP19NS! (U12438)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Buggerof (U1250)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Poolmyfinger - CHAMP19NS! (U12438)
posted 50 seconds ago
Absolutely amazing! Incredible!

Three sh!tstains on society no longer a threat!

https://abcnews.go.com/US/texas-resident-grabs-shotgun-shoots-kills-home-invaders/story?id=67899837

I love my country. I am proud to have the Second Amendment!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cant wait for the news you were a victim of the second amendment...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Won't happen. I am a law abiding citizen with an outstanding public record. I contribute toward a safe and positive community.

All of the leeches know they can't come to my neighborhood or they'll meet their end.

Love the Second Amendment. Love the NRA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you dont understand, I hope you get shot, thats what it says

comment by Buggerof (U1250)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Buggerof (U1250)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Liverpoolwhoelse17 (U16825)
posted 47 minutes ago
I apologies, for thinking the guilty would be punished accordingly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You do understand that they were found not guilty based on no evidence found?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No they weren’t
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cas statement
Manchester City FC did not disguise equity funding as sponsorship contributions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has nothing to do with your claim of no evidence found

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Poolmyfinger - CHAMP19NS! (U12438)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Christopher - High Priest of The Church of Ndombele (U20930)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Poolmyfinger - CHAMP19NS! (U12438)
posted 2 minutes ago
Absolutely amazing! Incredible!

Three sh!tstains on society no longer a threat!

https://abcnews.go.com/US/texas-resident-grabs-shotgun-shoots-kills-home-invaders/story?id=67899837

I love my country. I am proud to have the Second Amendment!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cant believe how easy it is for these sh!strains to get guns! Maybe something should be done about that! Might protect the law abiding citizens!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Criminals don't care about laws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So we shouldn't have them?

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
“Just imagine what they would’ve done if City had been found guilty by Cas“

Go for it. It’s been a full on morning of imagination and fantasy for many of you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not too keen on not getting their own way in AD. Look at how they deal with anyone with the audacity to be gay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tbh dragging Abu Dhabi’s LGBT record into a conversation about Manchester City’s appeal to cas to point score just undermines any legitimacy you may have
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The two are linked by your owners so......
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s completely irrelevant to what we’re talking about. So it just comes across as if you’re using it as an opportunity to smear the club, which would be reaching, instead of actually giving a 5hit about LGBT rights.

comment by Christopher - High Priest of The Church of Ndombele (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Poolmyfinger - CHAMP19NS! (U12438)
posted 12 seconds ago
"The Bernalillo County District Attorney's office dropped shooting charges against the 31-year-old New Mexico man who allegedly seriously wounded a protester in Albuquerque on Monday."

https://www.npr.org/sections/live-updates-protests-for-racial-justice/2020/06/17/879410425/man-charged-over-shooting-at-albuquerque-statue-protest

YES!

Outnumbered five to one, the man pulled out a firearm and shot one of the protesters attacking him. Charges dropped. Common sense prevails again!

Don't be a victim. Own a firearm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont think you read that article lol.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"the district attorney said video of the scene showed Baca struck and injured three female protesters and that he would face three charges of battery."

Law abiding citizen outnumbered by attackers

comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
“Just imagine what they would’ve done if City had been found guilty by Cas“

Go for it. It’s been a full on morning of imagination and fantasy for many of you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not too keen on not getting their own way in AD. Look at how they deal with anyone with the audacity to be gay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tbh dragging Abu Dhabi’s LGBT record into a conversation about Manchester City’s appeal to cas to point score just undermines any legitimacy you may have
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The two are linked by your owners so......
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s completely irrelevant to what we’re talking about. So it just comes across as if you’re using it as an opportunity to smear the club, which would be reaching, instead of actually giving a 5hit about LGBT rights.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll smear your owners for being part of a disgusting regime. Do you deny they are?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Poolmyfinger - CHAMP19NS! (U12438)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Buggerof (U1250)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Poolmyfinger - CHAMP19NS! (U12438)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Buggerof (U1250)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Poolmyfinger - CHAMP19NS! (U12438)
posted 50 seconds ago
Absolutely amazing! Incredible!

Three sh!tstains on society no longer a threat!

https://abcnews.go.com/US/texas-resident-grabs-shotgun-shoots-kills-home-invaders/story?id=67899837

I love my country. I am proud to have the Second Amendment!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cant wait for the news you were a victim of the second amendment...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Won't happen. I am a law abiding citizen with an outstanding public record. I contribute toward a safe and positive community.

All of the leeches know they can't come to my neighborhood or they'll meet their end.

Love the Second Amendment. Love the NRA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you dont understand, I hope you get shot, thats what it says
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why don't you come and do it yourself?

When you feel you're man enough, come to this side of the pond. You'll be back on a plane to the UK in a black trash bag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont have a gun, just hope you run into a nutcase with a gun, and sort you out, i'll be celebrating the second amendment then

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
“Just imagine what they would’ve done if City had been found guilty by Cas“

Go for it. It’s been a full on morning of imagination and fantasy for many of you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not too keen on not getting their own way in AD. Look at how they deal with anyone with the audacity to be gay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tbh dragging Abu Dhabi’s LGBT record into a conversation about Manchester City’s appeal to cas to point score just undermines any legitimacy you may have
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The two are linked by your owners so......
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s completely irrelevant to what we’re talking about. So it just comes across as if you’re using it as an opportunity to smear the club, which would be reaching, instead of actually giving a 5hit about LGBT rights.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll smear your owners for being part of a disgusting regime. Do you deny they are?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What owners are they then?

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Buggerof (U1250)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Buggerof (U1250)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Liverpoolwhoelse17 (U16825)
posted 47 minutes ago
I apologies, for thinking the guilty would be punished accordingly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You do understand that they were found not guilty based on no evidence found?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No they weren’t
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cas statement
Manchester City FC did not disguise equity funding as sponsorship contributions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has nothing to do with your claim of no evidence found
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If there was evidence, they would have been found guilty. Thats kind of how it works

comment by Buggerof (U1250)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Buggerof (U1250)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Buggerof (U1250)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Liverpoolwhoelse17 (U16825)
posted 47 minutes ago
I apologies, for thinking the guilty would be punished accordingly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You do understand that they were found not guilty based on no evidence found?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No they weren’t
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cas statement
Manchester City FC did not disguise equity funding as sponsorship contributions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has nothing to do with your claim of no evidence found
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If there was evidence, they would have been found guilty. Thats kind of how it works
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The evidence they did have was mostly beyond the ridiculous 5 year statute of limitations.

Show me where in the ruling it says there was no evidence?

comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
“Just imagine what they would’ve done if City had been found guilty by Cas“

Go for it. It’s been a full on morning of imagination and fantasy for many of you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not too keen on not getting their own way in AD. Look at how they deal with anyone with the audacity to be gay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tbh dragging Abu Dhabi’s LGBT record into a conversation about Manchester City’s appeal to cas to point score just undermines any legitimacy you may have
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The two are linked by your owners so......
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s completely irrelevant to what we’re talking about. So it just comes across as if you’re using it as an opportunity to smear the club, which would be reaching, instead of actually giving a 5hit about LGBT rights.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll smear your owners for being part of a disgusting regime. Do you deny they are?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What owners are they then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm......what owners are we speaking about? The owners of Accrington or the owners of City?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

The evidence they had wasn’t mostly beyond the 5 years at all.

“the alleged breaches reported by the Adjudicatory Chamber of the CFCB were either not established or time-barred.”

That is all they have said and all we will know until the full report

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
“Just imagine what they would’ve done if City had been found guilty by Cas“

Go for it. It’s been a full on morning of imagination and fantasy for many of you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not too keen on not getting their own way in AD. Look at how they deal with anyone with the audacity to be gay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tbh dragging Abu Dhabi’s LGBT record into a conversation about Manchester City’s appeal to cas to point score just undermines any legitimacy you may have
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The two are linked by your owners so......
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s completely irrelevant to what we’re talking about. So it just comes across as if you’re using it as an opportunity to smear the club, which would be reaching, instead of actually giving a 5hit about LGBT rights.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll smear your owners for being part of a disgusting regime. Do you deny they are?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What owners are they then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm......what owners are we speaking about? The owners of Accrington or the owners of City?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well we don’t have owners. Which just reinforces the fact that you’re just trying to push your own agenda

comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
“Just imagine what they would’ve done if City had been found guilty by Cas“

Go for it. It’s been a full on morning of imagination and fantasy for many of you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not too keen on not getting their own way in AD. Look at how they deal with anyone with the audacity to be gay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tbh dragging Abu Dhabi’s LGBT record into a conversation about Manchester City’s appeal to cas to point score just undermines any legitimacy you may have
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The two are linked by your owners so......
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s completely irrelevant to what we’re talking about. So it just comes across as if you’re using it as an opportunity to smear the club, which would be reaching, instead of actually giving a 5hit about LGBT rights.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll smear your owners for being part of a disgusting regime. Do you deny they are?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What owners are they then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm......what owners are we speaking about? The owners of Accrington or the owners of City?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well we don’t have owners. Which just reinforces the fact that you’re just trying to push your own agenda
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who in owns Man City?

comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 2 minutes ago
The evidence they had wasn’t mostly beyond the 5 years at all.

“the alleged breaches reported by the Adjudicatory Chamber of the CFCB were either not established or time-barred.”

That is all they have said and all we will know until the full report
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet UEFA have said most fell beyond the 5 year limit.

Are you alright?

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 2 minutes ago
The evidence they had wasn’t mostly beyond the 5 years at all.

“the alleged breaches reported by the Adjudicatory Chamber of the CFCB were either not established or time-barred.”

That is all they have said and all we will know until the full report
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet UEFA have said most fell beyond the 5 year limit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Uefa also gave us a 2 year ban and a 30m fine

I’ll wait for the report.

comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 minute ago
Are you alright?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, ignore the typo.

Who owns Man City?

comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 2 minutes ago
The evidence they had wasn’t mostly beyond the 5 years at all.

“the alleged breaches reported by the Adjudicatory Chamber of the CFCB were either not established or time-barred.”

That is all they have said and all we will know until the full report
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet UEFA have said most fell beyond the 5 year limit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Uefa also gave us a 2 year ban and a 30m fine

I’ll wait for the report.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cas haven’t also said some, non specific, fell outside as well then?

Some is very different to most, and it’s funny how it’s the statute of limitations part which seems to have been pounced on

As for who owns City we are owned by one person, I’m not really sure what your point is though other than going down a rabbit hole of whataboutery