comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Legacy Fan (U1270)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 36 seconds ago
No club has a guaranteed place in the Premier League. What sort of nonsense is that? If United finished last on 10 points we'd be relegated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dont be naive. There are at least 10 clubs with no risk of relegation every season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there a mechanism in place that means they can be relegated? Yes, yes there is.
The fact they are unlikely to be relegated is down to their performances on the pitch.
This isn't difficult!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didnt say they couldn't be relegated did I.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But they can't in the Super League. Can't you see the difference?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They cant for the first period. That might change after a while once its established.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you're in favour of it because they might change the rules to make it fairer in the future
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm just tryingn to understand the concerns some have and to point out there are positives
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's odd you can't understand the concerns when so many people are telling you the same thing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only concern appears to be that some clubs are guaranteed involvment which is deemed unfair, however if we are honest, that's already almost the case for most of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is unfair, not deemed unfair.
No it wouldn’t have. Barca were still the second biggest team in Spain, even if they weren’t the second best team.
And it wasn’t 20 years ago so it’s moot. Barca are probably the most popular football team in the bloody world, of course they were going to be a permanent member.
comment by Rachel The Queen Riley (U10026)
posted 14 seconds ago
No it wouldn’t have. Barca were still the second biggest team in Spain, even if they weren’t the second best team.
And it wasn’t 20 years ago so it’s moot. Barca are probably the most popular football team in the bloody world, of course they were going to be a permanent member.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What I did mean was a big club not performing as it's stature indicates it should. There's no doubt in my mind Barca should always be involved at the top table of course.
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Rachel The Queen Riley (U10026)
posted 14 seconds ago
No it wouldn’t have. Barca were still the second biggest team in Spain, even if they weren’t the second best team.
And it wasn’t 20 years ago so it’s moot. Barca are probably the most popular football team in the bloody world, of course they were going to be a permanent member.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What I did mean was a big club not performing as it's stature indicates it should. There's no doubt in my mind Barca should always be involved at the top table of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You weren't replying to me were you sorry!
My point is this concept is so dumb because if you want the best teams in this god damn super league, an underperforming Barca team (insert Spurs, AC Milan, IDK) would not be the best value for product.
$$$$ driving this nonsense and I hate it.
Bayern munich have said no so not having the current champions league champions in it kind of makes it look stupid.
I agree the concept is dumb, but asking why Barca are in it is even more dumb. Barca are underperforming by their incredible standards, but will still probably come away having won the double this season. They are the most popular club in world football. No super league gets off the ground without a club like Barca involved.
Would it be better if I stick to questioning Tottenham's place in this? Or Atleti? Or Milan?
It would have more merit than questioning Barca’s inclusion. But again, these are currently, and historically, popular clubs. So it’s really not a surprise they are included - they want the most popular clubs in there.
And this is the bloody problem with it. As these popular clubs haven’t been deserving of dining at the top of the table in Europe due to their lack of sporting merit - Inter and Milan, in particular, have been a joke for the last decade nearly.
comment by Rachel The Queen Riley (U10026)
posted 20 minutes ago
No it wouldn’t have. Barca were still the second biggest team in Spain, even if they weren’t the second best team.
And it wasn’t 20 years ago so it’s moot. Barca are probably the most popular football team in the bloody world, of course they were going to be a permanent member.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They also happen to be close to £300m in debt.
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 54 minutes ago
Anyway, until we know all the facts I won't decide how I feel about it, however I can see some positives to it (huge sums of money to clubs and UEFA being took to task)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the money is limited to 15 teams, dont you see that is the problem????
You are the thickest person I have ever met, you and Culer. Fack me.
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Percy Pig aficionado (U3126)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Rachel The Queen Riley (U10026)
posted 20 minutes ago
No it wouldn’t have. Barca were still the second biggest team in Spain, even if they weren’t the second best team.
And it wasn’t 20 years ago so it’s moot. Barca are probably the most popular football team in the bloody world, of course they were going to be a permanent member.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They also happen to be close to £300m in debt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, but so are Valencia and Roma, I believe. Not hard to work out why those two aren’t in it and Barca are.
https://twitter.com/GaryLineker/status/1384502970583117824
Its not all bad news.
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
RDD.
Imagine for a second you are a Leicester fan. Your team has spent the last few years steadily building a really good team. It's good enough to get into the Champions League, compete with the best on the continent and get the prize money which comes with it.
All of a sudden a load of clubs who don't like that you've done this have formed a Super League. You'll miss out on the regular income that comes with it because you're not glamorous enough. But Arsenal, a club that have spent the last few years being run horrendously, get in unconditionally because they were more successful over some arbitrary period of history.
And no, the 'extra 5' places aren't much consolation when Arsenal could finish 17th every season and still receive a ridiculous sum of money for it.
That's it really. If you don't understand why that will make teams absolutely furious and destroy the fabric of the sport, I dont really know what else to say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagibe you are Leicester and you are told by WBA and Sheffield Utd you can't participate in a super.league worth £350m per season because WBA and Sheff Utd think its unfair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thaught you weren't RDD
comment by Sut mine klunker - Admin 5 (U1250)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 54 minutes ago
Anyway, until we know all the facts I won't decide how I feel about it, however I can see some positives to it (huge sums of money to clubs and UEFA being took to task)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the money is limited to 15 teams, dont you see that is the problem????
You are the thickest person I have ever met, you and Culer. Fack me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The league will be contested by 20 teams each year mate.
No need for the abuse. Its childish
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
RDD.
Imagine for a second you are a Leicester fan. Your team has spent the last few years steadily building a really good team. It's good enough to get into the Champions League, compete with the best on the continent and get the prize money which comes with it.
All of a sudden a load of clubs who don't like that you've done this have formed a Super League. You'll miss out on the regular income that comes with it because you're not glamorous enough. But Arsenal, a club that have spent the last few years being run horrendously, get in unconditionally because they were more successful over some arbitrary period of history.
And no, the 'extra 5' places aren't much consolation when Arsenal could finish 17th every season and still receive a ridiculous sum of money for it.
That's it really. If you don't understand why that will make teams absolutely furious and destroy the fabric of the sport, I dont really know what else to say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagibe you are Leicester and you are told by WBA and Sheffield Utd you can't participate in a super.league worth £350m per season because WBA and Sheff Utd think its unfair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thaught you weren't RDD
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I could get into im not, yes you are, but id prefer to address the post that was clearly Intended for me.
The OP is an absolute spacker.
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Sut mine klunker - Admin 5 (U1250)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 54 minutes ago
Anyway, until we know all the facts I won't decide how I feel about it, however I can see some positives to it (huge sums of money to clubs and UEFA being took to task)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the money is limited to 15 teams, dont you see that is the problem????
You are the thickest person I have ever met, you and Culer. Fack me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The league will be contested by 20 teams each year mate.
No need for the abuse. Its childish
----------------------------------------------------------------------
15 teams are the same teams year in year out ffs mate
Breaking news that UEFA and FIFA are banned from blocking the Super League
comment by Sut mine klunker - Admin 5 (U1250)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Sut mine klunker - Admin 5 (U1250)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 54 minutes ago
Anyway, until we know all the facts I won't decide how I feel about it, however I can see some positives to it (huge sums of money to clubs and UEFA being took to task)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the money is limited to 15 teams, dont you see that is the problem????
You are the thickest person I have ever met, you and Culer. Fack me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The league will be contested by 20 teams each year mate.
No need for the abuse. Its childish
----------------------------------------------------------------------
15 teams are the same teams year in year outffs mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t bother he knows full well and is just playing this pathetic online character to get attention
Hmm what are the negatives of a super league
Did everyone manage to list the specific reasons why they are so against this Super League?
comment by The Post Nearly Man. Fckthglzrs. (U1270)
posted 7 minutes ago
Did everyone manage to list the specific reasons why they are so against this Super League?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Astounding negativity according to the OP
Sign in if you want to comment
Negatives of a Super League
Page 7 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 20/4/21
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Legacy Fan (U1270)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 36 seconds ago
No club has a guaranteed place in the Premier League. What sort of nonsense is that? If United finished last on 10 points we'd be relegated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dont be naive. There are at least 10 clubs with no risk of relegation every season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there a mechanism in place that means they can be relegated? Yes, yes there is.
The fact they are unlikely to be relegated is down to their performances on the pitch.
This isn't difficult!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didnt say they couldn't be relegated did I.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But they can't in the Super League. Can't you see the difference?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They cant for the first period. That might change after a while once its established.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you're in favour of it because they might change the rules to make it fairer in the future
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm just tryingn to understand the concerns some have and to point out there are positives
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's odd you can't understand the concerns when so many people are telling you the same thing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only concern appears to be that some clubs are guaranteed involvment which is deemed unfair, however if we are honest, that's already almost the case for most of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is unfair, not deemed unfair.
posted on 20/4/21
No it wouldn’t have. Barca were still the second biggest team in Spain, even if they weren’t the second best team.
And it wasn’t 20 years ago so it’s moot. Barca are probably the most popular football team in the bloody world, of course they were going to be a permanent member.
posted on 20/4/21
comment by Rachel The Queen Riley (U10026)
posted 14 seconds ago
No it wouldn’t have. Barca were still the second biggest team in Spain, even if they weren’t the second best team.
And it wasn’t 20 years ago so it’s moot. Barca are probably the most popular football team in the bloody world, of course they were going to be a permanent member.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What I did mean was a big club not performing as it's stature indicates it should. There's no doubt in my mind Barca should always be involved at the top table of course.
posted on 20/4/21
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Rachel The Queen Riley (U10026)
posted 14 seconds ago
No it wouldn’t have. Barca were still the second biggest team in Spain, even if they weren’t the second best team.
And it wasn’t 20 years ago so it’s moot. Barca are probably the most popular football team in the bloody world, of course they were going to be a permanent member.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What I did mean was a big club not performing as it's stature indicates it should. There's no doubt in my mind Barca should always be involved at the top table of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You weren't replying to me were you sorry!
posted on 20/4/21
My point is this concept is so dumb because if you want the best teams in this god damn super league, an underperforming Barca team (insert Spurs, AC Milan, IDK) would not be the best value for product.
$$$$ driving this nonsense and I hate it.
posted on 20/4/21
Bayern munich have said no so not having the current champions league champions in it kind of makes it look stupid.
posted on 20/4/21
I agree the concept is dumb, but asking why Barca are in it is even more dumb. Barca are underperforming by their incredible standards, but will still probably come away having won the double this season. They are the most popular club in world football. No super league gets off the ground without a club like Barca involved.
posted on 20/4/21
Would it be better if I stick to questioning Tottenham's place in this? Or Atleti? Or Milan?
posted on 20/4/21
It would have more merit than questioning Barca’s inclusion. But again, these are currently, and historically, popular clubs. So it’s really not a surprise they are included - they want the most popular clubs in there.
And this is the bloody problem with it. As these popular clubs haven’t been deserving of dining at the top of the table in Europe due to their lack of sporting merit - Inter and Milan, in particular, have been a joke for the last decade nearly.
posted on 20/4/21
comment by Rachel The Queen Riley (U10026)
posted 20 minutes ago
No it wouldn’t have. Barca were still the second biggest team in Spain, even if they weren’t the second best team.
And it wasn’t 20 years ago so it’s moot. Barca are probably the most popular football team in the bloody world, of course they were going to be a permanent member.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They also happen to be close to £300m in debt.
posted on 20/4/21
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 54 minutes ago
Anyway, until we know all the facts I won't decide how I feel about it, however I can see some positives to it (huge sums of money to clubs and UEFA being took to task)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the money is limited to 15 teams, dont you see that is the problem????
You are the thickest person I have ever met, you and Culer. Fack me.
posted on 20/4/21
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Percy Pig aficionado (U3126)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Rachel The Queen Riley (U10026)
posted 20 minutes ago
No it wouldn’t have. Barca were still the second biggest team in Spain, even if they weren’t the second best team.
And it wasn’t 20 years ago so it’s moot. Barca are probably the most popular football team in the bloody world, of course they were going to be a permanent member.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They also happen to be close to £300m in debt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, but so are Valencia and Roma, I believe. Not hard to work out why those two aren’t in it and Barca are.
posted on 20/4/21
https://twitter.com/GaryLineker/status/1384502970583117824
Its not all bad news.
posted on 20/4/21
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
RDD.
Imagine for a second you are a Leicester fan. Your team has spent the last few years steadily building a really good team. It's good enough to get into the Champions League, compete with the best on the continent and get the prize money which comes with it.
All of a sudden a load of clubs who don't like that you've done this have formed a Super League. You'll miss out on the regular income that comes with it because you're not glamorous enough. But Arsenal, a club that have spent the last few years being run horrendously, get in unconditionally because they were more successful over some arbitrary period of history.
And no, the 'extra 5' places aren't much consolation when Arsenal could finish 17th every season and still receive a ridiculous sum of money for it.
That's it really. If you don't understand why that will make teams absolutely furious and destroy the fabric of the sport, I dont really know what else to say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagibe you are Leicester and you are told by WBA and Sheffield Utd you can't participate in a super.league worth £350m per season because WBA and Sheff Utd think its unfair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thaught you weren't RDD
posted on 20/4/21
comment by Sut mine klunker - Admin 5 (U1250)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 54 minutes ago
Anyway, until we know all the facts I won't decide how I feel about it, however I can see some positives to it (huge sums of money to clubs and UEFA being took to task)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the money is limited to 15 teams, dont you see that is the problem????
You are the thickest person I have ever met, you and Culer. Fack me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The league will be contested by 20 teams each year mate.
No need for the abuse. Its childish
posted on 20/4/21
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
RDD.
Imagine for a second you are a Leicester fan. Your team has spent the last few years steadily building a really good team. It's good enough to get into the Champions League, compete with the best on the continent and get the prize money which comes with it.
All of a sudden a load of clubs who don't like that you've done this have formed a Super League. You'll miss out on the regular income that comes with it because you're not glamorous enough. But Arsenal, a club that have spent the last few years being run horrendously, get in unconditionally because they were more successful over some arbitrary period of history.
And no, the 'extra 5' places aren't much consolation when Arsenal could finish 17th every season and still receive a ridiculous sum of money for it.
That's it really. If you don't understand why that will make teams absolutely furious and destroy the fabric of the sport, I dont really know what else to say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagibe you are Leicester and you are told by WBA and Sheffield Utd you can't participate in a super.league worth £350m per season because WBA and Sheff Utd think its unfair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thaught you weren't RDD
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I could get into im not, yes you are, but id prefer to address the post that was clearly Intended for me.
posted on 20/4/21
The OP is an absolute spacker.
posted on 20/4/21
dox in progress
posted on 20/4/21
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Sut mine klunker - Admin 5 (U1250)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 54 minutes ago
Anyway, until we know all the facts I won't decide how I feel about it, however I can see some positives to it (huge sums of money to clubs and UEFA being took to task)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the money is limited to 15 teams, dont you see that is the problem????
You are the thickest person I have ever met, you and Culer. Fack me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The league will be contested by 20 teams each year mate.
No need for the abuse. Its childish
----------------------------------------------------------------------
15 teams are the same teams year in year out ffs mate
posted on 20/4/21
Breaking news that UEFA and FIFA are banned from blocking the Super League
posted on 20/4/21
comment by Sut mine klunker - Admin 5 (U1250)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Sut mine klunker - Admin 5 (U1250)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by The Mur Man (U22601)
posted 54 minutes ago
Anyway, until we know all the facts I won't decide how I feel about it, however I can see some positives to it (huge sums of money to clubs and UEFA being took to task)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the money is limited to 15 teams, dont you see that is the problem????
You are the thickest person I have ever met, you and Culer. Fack me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The league will be contested by 20 teams each year mate.
No need for the abuse. Its childish
----------------------------------------------------------------------
15 teams are the same teams year in year outffs mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t bother he knows full well and is just playing this pathetic online character to get attention
posted on 20/4/21
Hmm what are the negatives of a super league
posted on 21/4/21
posted on 21/4/21
Did everyone manage to list the specific reasons why they are so against this Super League?
posted on 21/4/21
comment by The Post Nearly Man. Fckthglzrs. (U1270)
posted 7 minutes ago
Did everyone manage to list the specific reasons why they are so against this Super League?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Astounding negativity according to the OP
Page 7 of 8
6 | 7 | 8