comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
I already stated above that the date was bullshiite, if you hadn’t noticed I asking about the 20:1 ratio silly!
Like I also said earlier that we can then compare like for like once you provide the year!
Simple really, even for you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is 3 workers (whose bills have also risen and likely have more outgoings than a pensioner) paying the pension and subsidising their heating sustainable?
Is it right that the taxpayer subsidsises WFP's whilst utility companies declare billions in profit?
You won't answer the above you coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again more hypocrisy from TrannyAnnie, crying about not answering questions!
Ok, so we’ll no write your over 20:1 ratio as bullshiite as we can’t compare!
I’ll get to your question shortly, so stop stamping those little feet of yours!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post some proof to the contrary or bore off you dullard
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
TrannyAnnie did you say something along the lines of the Tories were partly to blame for allowing the energy companies to get away with the prices to protect profits by subsidising fuel poverty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yawn
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
I already stated above that the date was bullshiite, if you hadn’t noticed I asking about the 20:1 ratio silly!
Like I also said earlier that we can then compare like for like once you provide the year!
Simple really, even for you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is 3 workers (whose bills have also risen and likely have more outgoings than a pensioner) paying the pension and subsidising their heating sustainable?
Is it right that the taxpayer subsidsises WFP's whilst utility companies declare billions in profit?
You won't answer the above you coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again more hypocrisy from TrannyAnnie, crying about not answering questions!
Ok, so we’ll no write your over 20:1 ratio as bullshiite as we can’t compare!
I’ll get to your question shortly, so stop stamping those little feet of yours!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post some proof to the contrary or bore off you dullard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was your ‘fact’ all I’ve been asking is can you clarify the year! Says so much about your fact if it can’t be compared!
But we’ll put that one down as another one of your lashing out in the dark facts! 🤣
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
TrannyAnnie did you say something along the lines of the Tories were partly to blame for allowing the energy companies to get away with the prices to protect profits by subsidising fuel poverty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yawn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really! Why wont you confirm if I was right or not in thinking you said that, what’s to be afraid on this one?
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
I already stated above that the date was bullshiite, if you hadn’t noticed I asking about the 20:1 ratio silly!
Like I also said earlier that we can then compare like for like once you provide the year!
Simple really, even for you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is 3 workers (whose bills have also risen and likely have more outgoings than a pensioner) paying the pension and subsidising their heating sustainable?
Is it right that the taxpayer subsidsises WFP's whilst utility companies declare billions in profit?
You won't answer the above you coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again more hypocrisy from TrannyAnnie, crying about not answering questions!
Ok, so we’ll no write your over 20:1 ratio as bullshiite as we can’t compare!
I’ll get to your question shortly, so stop stamping those little feet of yours!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post some proof to the contrary or bore off you dullard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was your ‘fact’ all I’ve been asking is can you clarify the year! Says so much about your fact if it can’t be compared!
But we’ll put that one down as another one of your lashing out in the dark facts! 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If of bothers you that much you'll look of up yourself instead of asking strangers to do of for you. Or post some proof to the contrary.
You're so needy
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
TrannyAnnie did you say something along the lines of the Tories were partly to blame for allowing the energy companies to get away with the prices to protect profits by subsidising fuel poverty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yawn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really! Why wont you confirm if I was right or not in thinking you said that, what’s to be afraid on this one?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Confirm or yourself you dullard.
You've avoided my questions so why should I do anything for you?
Is 3 workers (whose bills have also risen and likely have more outgoings than a pensioner) paying the pension and subsidising their heating sustainable?
Is it right that the taxpayer subsidsises WFP's whilst utility companies declare billions in profit?
Fackin coward
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
I already stated above that the date was bullshiite, if you hadn’t noticed I asking about the 20:1 ratio silly!
Like I also said earlier that we can then compare like for like once you provide the year!
Simple really, even for you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is 3 workers (whose bills have also risen and likely have more outgoings than a pensioner) paying the pension and subsidising their heating sustainable?
Is it right that the taxpayer subsidsises WFP's whilst utility companies declare billions in profit?
You won't answer the above you coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again more hypocrisy from TrannyAnnie, crying about not answering questions!
Ok, so we’ll no write your over 20:1 ratio as bullshiite as we can’t compare!
I’ll get to your question shortly, so stop stamping those little feet of yours!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post some proof to the contrary or bore off you dullard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was your ‘fact’ all I’ve been asking is can you clarify the year! Says so much about your fact if it can’t be compared!
But we’ll put that one down as another one of your lashing out in the dark facts! 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If of bothers you that much you'll look of up yourself instead of asking strangers to do of for you. Or post some proof to the contrary.
You're so needy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you just call me a dullard after writing that?
Wow! You’re very angry this morning, too much cheap sangria on the caravilla terrace last night?
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
I already stated above that the date was bullshiite, if you hadn’t noticed I asking about the 20:1 ratio silly!
Like I also said earlier that we can then compare like for like once you provide the year!
Simple really, even for you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is 3 workers (whose bills have also risen and likely have more outgoings than a pensioner) paying the pension and subsidising their heating sustainable?
Is it right that the taxpayer subsidsises WFP's whilst utility companies declare billions in profit?
You won't answer the above you coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again more hypocrisy from TrannyAnnie, crying about not answering questions!
Ok, so we’ll no write your over 20:1 ratio as bullshiite as we can’t compare!
I’ll get to your question shortly, so stop stamping those little feet of yours!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post some proof to the contrary or bore off you dullard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was your ‘fact’ all I’ve been asking is can you clarify the year! Says so much about your fact if it can’t be compared!
But we’ll put that one down as another one of your lashing out in the dark facts! 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If of bothers you that much you'll look of up yourself instead of asking strangers to do of for you. Or post some proof to the contrary.
You're so needy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you just call me a dullard after writing that?
Wow! You’re very angry this morning, too much cheap sangria on the caravilla terrace last night?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Another pointless comment with a question mark at the end. You know that last sentence was a statement not a question
Like I said, so needy
Either disprove my claim or bore off.
Im not disputing there was a period with a 20:1 ratio but all I ask is you provide the year to see if it’s comparable in anyway, but you can’t or you’re afraid to so it renders it bullshiite!
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 9 minutes ago
Im not disputing there was a period with a 20:1 ratio but all I ask is you provide the year to see if it’s comparable in anyway, but you can’t or you’re afraid to so it renders it bullshiite!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The year I said I was unsure about
Yeah do one you idiot
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
Dev
" it will hit millions and potentially kill 1000s."
There's 12m pensioners in the UK 27% of which own a home worth more than 1m. Nearly 1/3rd own assets yet taking away £300 pa will hit millions. The numbers don't add up IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get that. But what about the other 9m? How many of them are above the credit payout but have little wealth.
Laboura own research estimate 3-4k pensions would die if the Tories did what Labour have now done.
The simple means testing of the payout throws a lot of people into difficulty while 27% are probably quite OK. It's so broadbrush that those who dont rely know the money don't notice it while those who were Reliant on it suffer. It may save some money but who is it hurting the most?
The Govt have said from the start that the broadest shoulders will carry a greater burden but it hasn't been the case. It's been all businesses hit by big tax hikes, big and small. It's all pensioners above benefit level whether wealthy or on the margins.
I know there's need to raise tax and am fine with the broadest carrying more burden but by saying they will not raise personal tax and corporation tax they have left themselves few pots to get money from and the NI and WFP polices have been pretty indiscriminate and it looks like a massive one grab rather than a considered and fair policy.
Dev .
You can't keep squeezing tax paying workers. We heard silly soundbites like 'well just give up Netflix' as solutions to in work poverty and increased food bank use by those working. The workforce is decreasing year on year yet the amount of pensioners is increasing. 1/3rd of 35-44 year olds are privately renting and csjt get on the housing ladder, whilst 37% of pensioners own homes worth more thsn £1m and 75% own their own homes instead of renting.
Whenever you hear workers pipe up about the cost of living, or increased impossibility to buy a home, it's met with daft sound bites like 'give up Netflix' and whatnot.
Irony of ironies being a worker privately renting from a pensioner (not unlikely or rare) paying off the pensioners mortgage, or second mortgage, whilst having to cough up for WFP via their taxes. Does that sound right to you?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 9 minutes ago
Im not disputing there was a period with a 20:1 ratio but all I ask is you provide the year to see if it’s comparable in anyway, but you can’t or you’re afraid to so it renders it bullshiite!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The year I said I was unsure about
Yeah do one you idiot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Yeah do one you idiot‘… You’re going on full on Chǎv now!
All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!
Like I’ve asked you before is this the same ratio you’re talking about?
If so, are you gonna raise me?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W98jFzvl7q4
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GhR-T40XIAA0Z8t?format=jpg&name=medium
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 13 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 9 minutes ago
Im not disputing there was a period with a 20:1 ratio but all I ask is you provide the year to see if it’s comparable in anyway, but you can’t or you’re afraid to so it renders it bullshiite!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The year I said I was unsure about
Yeah do one you idiot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Yeah do one you idiot‘… You’re going on full on Chǎv now!
All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!
Like I’ve asked you before is this the same ratio you’re talking about?
If so, are you gonna raise me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice bit of classism and transphobia, your true colours are coming out now.
"Like I’ve asked you before is this the same ratio you’re talking about?"
Source of this?
"All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!"
My bad, source for this?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 minutes ago
"All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!"
My bad, source for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I asked a question and this came up!
‘the introduction of the Basic State Pension in 1948 in the UK resulted in a ratio of about five working-age people for every state pensioner.’
But no doubt you’ll be dropping it into google, let me know if you find 1948 to be anything different, I’m open to offers!
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 minutes ago
"All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!"
My bad, source for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I asked a question and this came up!
‘the introduction of the Basic State Pension in 1948 in the UK resulted in a ratio of about five working-age people for every state pensioner.’
But no doubt you’ll be dropping it into google, let me know if you find 1948 to be anything different, I’m open to offers!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came up where?
What's the source of the sentence you copy pasted?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 minutes ago
"All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!"
My bad, source for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I asked a question and this came up!
‘the introduction of the Basic State Pension in 1948 in the UK resulted in a ratio of about five working-age people for every state pensioner.’
But no doubt you’ll be dropping it into google, let me know if you find 1948 to be anything different, I’m open to offers!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came up where?
What's the source of the sentence you copy pasted?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came up on your beloved google silly!
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 minutes ago
"All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!"
My bad, source for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I asked a question and this came up!
‘the introduction of the Basic State Pension in 1948 in the UK resulted in a ratio of about five working-age people for every state pensioner.’
But no doubt you’ll be dropping it into google, let me know if you find 1948 to be anything different, I’m open to offers!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came up where?
What's the source of the sentence you copy pasted?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came up on your beloved google silly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah Google isn't the source of that comment
Why not post a link and I'll have a look?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 minutes ago
"All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!"
My bad, source for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I asked a question and this came up!
‘the introduction of the Basic State Pension in 1948 in the UK resulted in a ratio of about five working-age people for every state pensioner.’
But no doubt you’ll be dropping it into google, let me know if you find 1948 to be anything different, I’m open to offers!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came up where?
What's the source of the sentence you copy pasted?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came up on your beloved google silly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah Google isn't the source of that comment
Why not post a link and I'll have a look?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like I said that came up, you must of dropped it into google by now!
So!
‘Either disprove my claim or bore off’ 😃
Sign in if you want to comment
Sir Keir Starmer !
Page 49 of 165
50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54
posted on 14/1/25
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
I already stated above that the date was bullshiite, if you hadn’t noticed I asking about the 20:1 ratio silly!
Like I also said earlier that we can then compare like for like once you provide the year!
Simple really, even for you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is 3 workers (whose bills have also risen and likely have more outgoings than a pensioner) paying the pension and subsidising their heating sustainable?
Is it right that the taxpayer subsidsises WFP's whilst utility companies declare billions in profit?
You won't answer the above you coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again more hypocrisy from TrannyAnnie, crying about not answering questions!
Ok, so we’ll no write your over 20:1 ratio as bullshiite as we can’t compare!
I’ll get to your question shortly, so stop stamping those little feet of yours!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post some proof to the contrary or bore off you dullard
posted on 14/1/25
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
TrannyAnnie did you say something along the lines of the Tories were partly to blame for allowing the energy companies to get away with the prices to protect profits by subsidising fuel poverty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yawn
posted on 14/1/25
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
I already stated above that the date was bullshiite, if you hadn’t noticed I asking about the 20:1 ratio silly!
Like I also said earlier that we can then compare like for like once you provide the year!
Simple really, even for you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is 3 workers (whose bills have also risen and likely have more outgoings than a pensioner) paying the pension and subsidising their heating sustainable?
Is it right that the taxpayer subsidsises WFP's whilst utility companies declare billions in profit?
You won't answer the above you coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again more hypocrisy from TrannyAnnie, crying about not answering questions!
Ok, so we’ll no write your over 20:1 ratio as bullshiite as we can’t compare!
I’ll get to your question shortly, so stop stamping those little feet of yours!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post some proof to the contrary or bore off you dullard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was your ‘fact’ all I’ve been asking is can you clarify the year! Says so much about your fact if it can’t be compared!
But we’ll put that one down as another one of your lashing out in the dark facts! 🤣
posted on 14/1/25
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
TrannyAnnie did you say something along the lines of the Tories were partly to blame for allowing the energy companies to get away with the prices to protect profits by subsidising fuel poverty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yawn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really! Why wont you confirm if I was right or not in thinking you said that, what’s to be afraid on this one?
posted on 14/1/25
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
I already stated above that the date was bullshiite, if you hadn’t noticed I asking about the 20:1 ratio silly!
Like I also said earlier that we can then compare like for like once you provide the year!
Simple really, even for you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is 3 workers (whose bills have also risen and likely have more outgoings than a pensioner) paying the pension and subsidising their heating sustainable?
Is it right that the taxpayer subsidsises WFP's whilst utility companies declare billions in profit?
You won't answer the above you coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again more hypocrisy from TrannyAnnie, crying about not answering questions!
Ok, so we’ll no write your over 20:1 ratio as bullshiite as we can’t compare!
I’ll get to your question shortly, so stop stamping those little feet of yours!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post some proof to the contrary or bore off you dullard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was your ‘fact’ all I’ve been asking is can you clarify the year! Says so much about your fact if it can’t be compared!
But we’ll put that one down as another one of your lashing out in the dark facts! 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If of bothers you that much you'll look of up yourself instead of asking strangers to do of for you. Or post some proof to the contrary.
You're so needy
posted on 14/1/25
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
TrannyAnnie did you say something along the lines of the Tories were partly to blame for allowing the energy companies to get away with the prices to protect profits by subsidising fuel poverty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yawn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really! Why wont you confirm if I was right or not in thinking you said that, what’s to be afraid on this one?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Confirm or yourself you dullard.
You've avoided my questions so why should I do anything for you?
Is 3 workers (whose bills have also risen and likely have more outgoings than a pensioner) paying the pension and subsidising their heating sustainable?
Is it right that the taxpayer subsidsises WFP's whilst utility companies declare billions in profit?
Fackin coward
posted on 14/1/25
It*
posted on 14/1/25
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
I already stated above that the date was bullshiite, if you hadn’t noticed I asking about the 20:1 ratio silly!
Like I also said earlier that we can then compare like for like once you provide the year!
Simple really, even for you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is 3 workers (whose bills have also risen and likely have more outgoings than a pensioner) paying the pension and subsidising their heating sustainable?
Is it right that the taxpayer subsidsises WFP's whilst utility companies declare billions in profit?
You won't answer the above you coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again more hypocrisy from TrannyAnnie, crying about not answering questions!
Ok, so we’ll no write your over 20:1 ratio as bullshiite as we can’t compare!
I’ll get to your question shortly, so stop stamping those little feet of yours!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post some proof to the contrary or bore off you dullard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was your ‘fact’ all I’ve been asking is can you clarify the year! Says so much about your fact if it can’t be compared!
But we’ll put that one down as another one of your lashing out in the dark facts! 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If of bothers you that much you'll look of up yourself instead of asking strangers to do of for you. Or post some proof to the contrary.
You're so needy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you just call me a dullard after writing that?
Wow! You’re very angry this morning, too much cheap sangria on the caravilla terrace last night?
posted on 14/1/25
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 2 minutes ago
I already stated above that the date was bullshiite, if you hadn’t noticed I asking about the 20:1 ratio silly!
Like I also said earlier that we can then compare like for like once you provide the year!
Simple really, even for you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is 3 workers (whose bills have also risen and likely have more outgoings than a pensioner) paying the pension and subsidising their heating sustainable?
Is it right that the taxpayer subsidsises WFP's whilst utility companies declare billions in profit?
You won't answer the above you coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again more hypocrisy from TrannyAnnie, crying about not answering questions!
Ok, so we’ll no write your over 20:1 ratio as bullshiite as we can’t compare!
I’ll get to your question shortly, so stop stamping those little feet of yours!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post some proof to the contrary or bore off you dullard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was your ‘fact’ all I’ve been asking is can you clarify the year! Says so much about your fact if it can’t be compared!
But we’ll put that one down as another one of your lashing out in the dark facts! 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If of bothers you that much you'll look of up yourself instead of asking strangers to do of for you. Or post some proof to the contrary.
You're so needy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you just call me a dullard after writing that?
Wow! You’re very angry this morning, too much cheap sangria on the caravilla terrace last night?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Another pointless comment with a question mark at the end. You know that last sentence was a statement not a question
Like I said, so needy
Either disprove my claim or bore off.
posted on 14/1/25
Im not disputing there was a period with a 20:1 ratio but all I ask is you provide the year to see if it’s comparable in anyway, but you can’t or you’re afraid to so it renders it bullshiite!
posted on 14/1/25
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 9 minutes ago
Im not disputing there was a period with a 20:1 ratio but all I ask is you provide the year to see if it’s comparable in anyway, but you can’t or you’re afraid to so it renders it bullshiite!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The year I said I was unsure about
Yeah do one you idiot
posted on 14/1/25
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
Dev
" it will hit millions and potentially kill 1000s."
There's 12m pensioners in the UK 27% of which own a home worth more than 1m. Nearly 1/3rd own assets yet taking away £300 pa will hit millions. The numbers don't add up IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get that. But what about the other 9m? How many of them are above the credit payout but have little wealth.
Laboura own research estimate 3-4k pensions would die if the Tories did what Labour have now done.
The simple means testing of the payout throws a lot of people into difficulty while 27% are probably quite OK. It's so broadbrush that those who dont rely know the money don't notice it while those who were Reliant on it suffer. It may save some money but who is it hurting the most?
The Govt have said from the start that the broadest shoulders will carry a greater burden but it hasn't been the case. It's been all businesses hit by big tax hikes, big and small. It's all pensioners above benefit level whether wealthy or on the margins.
I know there's need to raise tax and am fine with the broadest carrying more burden but by saying they will not raise personal tax and corporation tax they have left themselves few pots to get money from and the NI and WFP polices have been pretty indiscriminate and it looks like a massive one grab rather than a considered and fair policy.
posted on 14/1/25
*cash grab
posted on 14/1/25
Dev .
You can't keep squeezing tax paying workers. We heard silly soundbites like 'well just give up Netflix' as solutions to in work poverty and increased food bank use by those working. The workforce is decreasing year on year yet the amount of pensioners is increasing. 1/3rd of 35-44 year olds are privately renting and csjt get on the housing ladder, whilst 37% of pensioners own homes worth more thsn £1m and 75% own their own homes instead of renting.
Whenever you hear workers pipe up about the cost of living, or increased impossibility to buy a home, it's met with daft sound bites like 'give up Netflix' and whatnot.
Irony of ironies being a worker privately renting from a pensioner (not unlikely or rare) paying off the pensioners mortgage, or second mortgage, whilst having to cough up for WFP via their taxes. Does that sound right to you?
posted on 14/1/25
27% not 37%
posted on 14/1/25
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 9 minutes ago
Im not disputing there was a period with a 20:1 ratio but all I ask is you provide the year to see if it’s comparable in anyway, but you can’t or you’re afraid to so it renders it bullshiite!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The year I said I was unsure about
Yeah do one you idiot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Yeah do one you idiot‘… You’re going on full on Chǎv now!
All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!
Like I’ve asked you before is this the same ratio you’re talking about?
If so, are you gonna raise me?
posted on 15/1/25
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W98jFzvl7q4
posted on 15/1/25
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GhR-T40XIAA0Z8t?format=jpg&name=medium
posted on 15/1/25
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 13 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 9 minutes ago
Im not disputing there was a period with a 20:1 ratio but all I ask is you provide the year to see if it’s comparable in anyway, but you can’t or you’re afraid to so it renders it bullshiite!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The year I said I was unsure about
Yeah do one you idiot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Yeah do one you idiot‘… You’re going on full on Chǎv now!
All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!
Like I’ve asked you before is this the same ratio you’re talking about?
If so, are you gonna raise me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice bit of classism and transphobia, your true colours are coming out now.
"Like I’ve asked you before is this the same ratio you’re talking about?"
Source of this?
posted on 15/1/25
"All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!"
My bad, source for this?
posted on 15/1/25
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 minutes ago
"All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!"
My bad, source for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I asked a question and this came up!
‘the introduction of the Basic State Pension in 1948 in the UK resulted in a ratio of about five working-age people for every state pensioner.’
But no doubt you’ll be dropping it into google, let me know if you find 1948 to be anything different, I’m open to offers!
posted on 15/1/25
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 minutes ago
"All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!"
My bad, source for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I asked a question and this came up!
‘the introduction of the Basic State Pension in 1948 in the UK resulted in a ratio of about five working-age people for every state pensioner.’
But no doubt you’ll be dropping it into google, let me know if you find 1948 to be anything different, I’m open to offers!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came up where?
What's the source of the sentence you copy pasted?
posted on 15/1/25
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 minutes ago
"All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!"
My bad, source for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I asked a question and this came up!
‘the introduction of the Basic State Pension in 1948 in the UK resulted in a ratio of about five working-age people for every state pensioner.’
But no doubt you’ll be dropping it into google, let me know if you find 1948 to be anything different, I’m open to offers!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came up where?
What's the source of the sentence you copy pasted?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came up on your beloved google silly!
posted on 15/1/25
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 minutes ago
"All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!"
My bad, source for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I asked a question and this came up!
‘the introduction of the Basic State Pension in 1948 in the UK resulted in a ratio of about five working-age people for every state pensioner.’
But no doubt you’ll be dropping it into google, let me know if you find 1948 to be anything different, I’m open to offers!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came up where?
What's the source of the sentence you copy pasted?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came up on your beloved google silly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah Google isn't the source of that comment
Why not post a link and I'll have a look?
posted on 15/1/25
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RED666…Always Right! 🇬🇧 (U6562)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 minutes ago
"All I’ve got TrannyAnnie for 1948 is 5 working age to 1 state pensioner!"
My bad, source for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I asked a question and this came up!
‘the introduction of the Basic State Pension in 1948 in the UK resulted in a ratio of about five working-age people for every state pensioner.’
But no doubt you’ll be dropping it into google, let me know if you find 1948 to be anything different, I’m open to offers!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came up where?
What's the source of the sentence you copy pasted?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came up on your beloved google silly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah Google isn't the source of that comment
Why not post a link and I'll have a look?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like I said that came up, you must of dropped it into google by now!
So!
‘Either disprove my claim or bore off’ 😃
Page 49 of 165
50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54