http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/tennis/18463253
Nadal loses to Kolschreiber and going to take a break back home in Mallorca.
With Murray going out early as well at Queens, it's a little sign that these players' schedules are pretty full on with little recovery time built in.
Busy schedule claims another victim
posted on 16/6/12
The most pathetic bit is when he lost his singles match he pulled out of the doubles one, as well
--------------------------------------------------------------
Just to put the record straight, it was Granollers that decided to pull out of the doubles.
But the truth has never got in the way of the haters on here having a bash at Nadal.
I believe I also read NITB commenting on Rafa only turning up for the appearance money. Oh how soon she forgets Novak last year turning up for one match at Bercy, banking his appearance money then not even bothering to play his next match and just withdrew. Of course his shoulder only started hurting after the first match. Probably the weight of his appearance money.
posted on 16/6/12
nadull is not the victim, it's the tennis which has become victim of his pathetic tennis.
Good to see him lose. Better player won, No, for sure!
posted on 16/6/12
I kind of agree with GP there. This part of the calendar has always been the same. I think tennis now puts too much premium on physical game and endurance. I mean, it has always been, and will always be, an athletic endeavour, but the focus on physicality has grown a bit too much.
Also, grass courts no longer play as different as they used to so players may feel it is not as crucial to get many matches under their belt.
posted on 16/6/12
The Mighty Federer, for sure the better player on the day won. Sure Rafa is crying into his Roland Garros trophy as we speak.
If you are saying that Kohlschreiber is the better player full stop, then all I can say to that is
posted on 16/6/12
If you are saying that Kohlschreiber is the better player full stop, then all I can say to that is
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I am saying that No, for Sure Nadull said that he had to play his best Lacko. So if Lacko needed nadull to play his best then we can all imagine as what Kohli might have forced him to produce, no, for sure?
Even after the match nadull did not stop in hailing Kohli as one of the best tennis player, correct, no, for sure?
posted on 16/6/12
Kholi is a good player. Nadal is no grass whizz and I'm glad he lost this match regardless of how and why.
Kholi has a great game for grass, is quick on his feet, knows how to use the entire court. It's only his size that's been a disadvantage to him as he lacks fire-power to fight off the more consistent baseliner players (such as Nadal).
Give Kholi some credit, as well.
It sends the right message to other players
posted on 16/6/12
For sure No
posted on 16/6/12
Wouldn't it be great for Nadal to get knocked out in the first round at Wimbledon !!!
By Kholi, of course
posted on 16/6/12
Wouldn't it be great for Nadal to get knocked out in the first round at Wimbledon !!!
By Kholi, of course
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I will buy drinks to everyone on the house if that becomes a reality.
posted on 17/6/12
U 2 sleep nice 2nite with ur Nadal voodoo doll, with 11 pins in it, get another pin ready, coz Nadal coming 2 claim his 3rd Wimbledon crown, ready 2 blast his opposition with his nuclear 4hand.