http://www.coolsport.tv/schedule.html
Wolves manager Kenny Jackett told BBC WM:
TEAMS
WOLVES: Ikeme, Doherty, Batth, Stearman, Ricketts, Ismail, Evans, Davis, Sako, Doyle, Sigurdarson. SUBS: McCarey, Elokobi, Price, McDonald, Forde, Cassidy, Griffiths.
CRAWLEY: Jones, Sadler, McFadzean, Clarke, Alexander, Drury, Simpson, Walsh, Bulman, Adams, Jones. SUBS: Hurst, Connolly, Essam, Torres, Proctor, Rooney, Maddison.
"It's early days. I'm very pleased to have got seven points from our first three games, but you have to judge any start on 10 matches.
"We'll have a more of assessment as to where we are by then,
"Crawley are a very good footballing side. If you let them, they can pass and create.
"We'll respect them but, after that, it's really about what we want to do. It's our home game and we're looking for attacking performances that bring our crowd into play."
Crawley Town manager Richie Barker told BBC Sussex:
"Three years ago, there were about five divisions between the teams and I am sure it is one the fans will enjoy.
"For Crawley to be competing at Wolves, we have come a hell of a long way.
"Kenny Jackett is a very good manager who has got teams out of this division before. I am sure he will do a good job despite the fact people have to move on.
"The players will thrive on playing there, but we will enjoy it if we go there and compete."
Live @ http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewLiveArticle/225566
One match ban enabled
Live article brought to you by William Hill (Free £25 Bet) -
Sign up now for a free £25 bet*
*Terms and Conditions apply
FT Wolves 2-1 Crawley - Live Match Thread
posted on 24/8/13
As Jackett said before the game, after all the upheaval over the summer what he needs is as settled a team as possible right now and I am sure he is right. Had Griffiths not been up in Scotland for the last couple of days I am sure we would have had an unchanged team, and as with the Gillingham game, if Griffiths had been in there, the game may well have been dead and buried after 20 minutes the way we dominated early on.
posted on 24/8/13
comment by wolfieintheSunshineState (U16306)
Just in case you missed it Bute.
-----------------------------
Ipswich Town manager Mick McCarthy:
"We should have put them to the sword when we were on top in the first half. But then they got a fortuitous equaliser which changed the course of the game.
_____________________
Which Wolves game are you referring to? I need context for this quote.
You, as usual, totally miss the point of why 95% of people on here dislike you. Whether you call it lucky or fortuitous, you couldn't be persuaded to give any credit to the team and the manager, at any time, for any of those Premier League wins.
Dress it up as you wish - you showed your true colours (colors), and your comments the other day, only reaffirmed your stance.
So, no wonder why 95% of those on here have the opinion that they do.
posted on 24/8/13
I've now realised you're referring to Mick's comments on the Ipswich page, about his side's defeat against Leeds today. Not sure what that's got to do with Wolves wins against the top sides being "lucky".
At least it's good that you're reminiscing about the man, and following the fortunes of his current club. I hadn't realised that you followed other teams, as I seem to remember some one on here stating that you didn't. Now who could that have been..?
Never too late for redemption though, and I wait in earnest.
posted on 24/8/13
Mick says Leeds' first goal today was "fortuitous", which WITSS sees as proof that Wolves wins against the top clubs in the Prem were lucky.
I'm struggling to see how the two can be connected. I should maybe start a thread about those wins, to get the general consencus of opinion.
posted on 24/8/13
Bute, your reference that 95% of posters on here "dislike me" is yet another gross exaggeration on your part. There are 4 posters who will argue the toss with me for no other reason than they like it. They are you, Cyp, DJ Molineux and Tatter.
When I've referred to a Wolves win as lucky, I mean just that. Yet your hero can say that Leeds were fortuitous and get away with it. And yet you lot call me hypocritical.
posted on 25/8/13
They are you, Cyp, DJ Molineux and Tatter.
No I don't!
posted on 25/8/13
Yes you do!!!!
posted on 25/8/13
oh no he doesn't....
oh yes he does
schizophrenic panto
posted on 25/8/13
comment by wolfieintheSunshineState (U16306)
When I've referred to a Wolves win as lucky, I mean just that. Yet your hero can say that Leeds were fortuitous and get away with it. And yet you lot call me hypocritical.
__________________
This is totally illogical reasoning, but I actually think you believe it, and are serious.
As a consequence, I'm going to drop this line of enquiry, as it's just going to round and round in circles, and wish you all the best.
posted on 25/8/13
WHY NOT HATE ALBION INSTEAD LIKE YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO !!!!!!