Could someone explain that decision?

I'm torn on this one, I watched it first thing yesterday morning and spent the whole day piissed off over the decision.

Watched it again last night and thought Jones did enough to keep his belt.

First time I watched it I spent the whole fight looking at Gustaffson and listening to the commentators creaming over him. But thats just because hes the only guy so far that was able to damage Jones a bit. When I watched it again I watched Jones and honestly he was in control for most of the fight. His kicks got overlooked, he got a lot of elbows in and at the end of the day you have to take the belt from the champ. A draw may have been a fair result but not for a title fight. You have to beat him well to take the belt and Gustaffson just fell short for me.

He wouldve been beaten over 3 rounds tho but it wasnt a 3 round fight.