or to join or start a new Discussion

Browse: Cricket  International 
22 Comments
Article Rating 5 Stars

Clarke or de Villiers or Younis Khan

Michael Clarke:
107 tests
Runs 8297
Avg 50.6; home 61.9, away & neutral 41.5
Avg excl BD & Zim 51.3

AB de Villers
95 tests
Runs 7296
Avg 51.0; home 45.8, away & neutral 57.2
Avg excl BD & Zim 52.0

Younis Khan
95 tests
Runs 8322
Avg 54.0; home 59.3, away & neutral 52.6
Avg excl BD & Zim 52.1

If I were to pick 2 of these for my middle order, I would go with Y Khan and ABD because these two are more reliable on the road.

I am talking about test cricket only. ABD, of course, is shoulders above the other two in the shorter formats.

posted on 25/11/14

comment by Whyalwaysme (U9900)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
You won't get better 1 down Number 3 batsman than Rahul Dravid, rock solid and reliable in any conditions. Sublime middle order like

Rahul Dravid
Sachin Tendulkar
VVS Laxman

was treat to watch back in days.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop living in the past

posted on 25/11/14

You won't get better 1 down Number 3 batsman than Rahul Dravid, rock solid and reliable in any conditions. Sublime middle order like

Rahul Dravid
Sachin Tendulkar
VVS Laxman

was treat to watch back in days.
____________________

Think OP is referring to current players only. Otherwise is have Dravid amongst the few already mentioned

posted on 25/11/14

I didn't realise Younis had such a good record, why do the Board keep falling out with what appears to be their premier batsman? Players like Kallis, Sanga, Jayawardene, Dravid and Tendukar have all shown that age isn't necessarily a barrier so is there another reason?

posted on 25/11/14

Sorry if it seems like a silly question, I've been woefully ignorant of Pakistani test cricket since they've not been able to play at home.

posted on 25/11/14

ou won't get better 1 down Number 3 batsman than Rahul Dravid, rock solid and reliable in any conditions. Sublime middle order like

Rahul Dravid
Sachin Tendulkar
VVS Laxman

was treat to watch back in days.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop living in the past
__________

Look who is telling me ??? a Liverpool fan

comment by my2c (U20086)

posted on 25/11/14

Look who shows up at the top with a batting average of 86 for the past 3 years!

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;orderby=batting_average;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;spanmax2=25+Nov+2014;spanmin2=25+Nov+2011;spanval2=span;template=results;type=batting

Average is blessed by 12 not outs in 35 innings.

posted on 25/11/14

C'paul is quality, but not in the same class (considering the criteria some are using here). He has an average of 30 in Aus and 41 in Saffers. Homie

comment by my2c (U20086)

posted on 25/11/14

True, Chanders has a batting average of 41 in SA, but Y Khan's average there is even lower at 33.

SA is a difficult place for batsmen, even for Saffers. Most SA batsmen have lower averages at home than on the road.

It's difficult to judge the worth of Chanderpaul. He plays for a weak team and often watches others fall off at the other end.

posted on 25/11/14

Yeah, true. Fair point.

posted on 25/11/14

Chanderpaul has always been a selfish batsman for me. So many times he's been left with tail and has never batted well and instead protected his N.O

also he's refused to play higher up in the batting order when his team need him too. Nice stats but poor mentality for the team.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 5 from 2 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available