City or Liverpool?

Don't calm down...talk some smack about his mother...

Sorry Ruiney, but someone being really cocky...and completely wrong in what they are saying, is a bit frustrating.

And Maest His mums a fat foul slag

Defnitley a contender for stupidest thread on ja606 from the manc board in a while...

we both horribly spent last few years and both of us were rank rotten at times last year...

we wasted the suarez money and ye spunnced yours on di maria..

lets just see what this season brings

Don't calm down...talk some smack about his mother...



------------------------

comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 4 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Mclanelli (U20318)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 2 hours, 22 minutes ago
The way the transfer eventually played out you have to laugh at City, they were bidding for a decent but not outstanding player, with seemingly no opposition, and spent 3 months haggling just to get £1m off the price (though they may get £3-4m off depending on the add-ons).

But the very existence of the transfer means you have to laugh at pool too, he may not have been their best player last year, but he is clearly their most valuable one, and selling yet another good player to a direct rival (?) is rarely good. Not to mention that as recently as may rodgers was saying that the player was going nowhere this summer, so no wonder he didn't want to talk about him the other day.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you still prattling on about add on's?

It's 49 million done deal, all in the bank, no ad on's.

You are hilariously deluded.

This guy spent three hours on Sunday arguing the deal was 45m plus add on's which we know it isn't - and he still won't let it go.

Amusing.

M
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i'd love to have thought you'd spent the past 3 days learning how to read, but apparently not.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3161142/Manchester-City-complete-49m-Raheem-Sterling-signing-Manuel-Pellegrini-hails-capture-one-best-attacking-players-world-football.html

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/jul/14/raheem-sterling-manchester-city-liverpool-transfer

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/pictures-raheem-sterling-completes-49million-6067371
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's even more amusing is that you prattle on continually and when challenged throw up links to a tabloid newspaper as back up to your comments.

Because tabloids never lie or fabricate. No they sit through negotiations and are well informed...

On Sunday you linked to the red tops now it's the daily mail?

Well statements from both clubs involved in the actual transfer have confirmed otherwise, which contradicts your tabloid source and you.

So that's the jam out of your doughnut.

M

comment by Mclanelli (U20318)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 4 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Mclanelli (U20318)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 2 hours, 22 minutes ago
The way the transfer eventually played out you have to laugh at City, they were bidding for a decent but not outstanding player, with seemingly no opposition, and spent 3 months haggling just to get £1m off the price (though they may get £3-4m off depending on the add-ons).

But the very existence of the transfer means you have to laugh at pool too, he may not have been their best player last year, but he is clearly their most valuable one, and selling yet another good player to a direct rival (?) is rarely good. Not to mention that as recently as may rodgers was saying that the player was going nowhere this summer, so no wonder he didn't want to talk about him the other day.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you still prattling on about add on's?

It's 49 million done deal, all in the bank, no ad on's.

You are hilariously deluded.

This guy spent three hours on Sunday arguing the deal was 45m plus add on's which we know it isn't - and he still won't let it go.

Amusing.

M
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i'd love to have thought you'd spent the past 3 days learning how to read, but apparently not.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3161142/Manchester-City-complete-49m-Raheem-Sterling-signing-Manuel-Pellegrini-hails-capture-one-best-attacking-players-world-football.html

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/jul/14/raheem-sterling-manchester-city-liverpool-transfer

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/pictures-raheem-sterling-completes-49million-6067371
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's even more amusing is that you prattle on continually and when challenged throw up links to a tabloid newspaper as back up to your comments.

Because tabloids never lie or fabricate. No they sit through negotiations and are well informed...

On Sunday you linked to the red tops now it's the daily mail?

Well statements from both clubs involved in the actual transfer have confirmed otherwise, which contradicts your tabloid source and you.

So that's the jam out of your doughnut.

M
----------------------------------------------------------------------
my god you really cannot let go can you?

feel free to post the club statements confirming the precise fee then.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Juddy Lad (U10967)
posted 1 hour ago
Sorry Ruiney, but someone being really cocky...and completely wrong in what they are saying, is a bit frustrating.

And MaestHis mums a fat foul slag
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not being còcky my good man. Just giving you some advice.

It is unfortunate that people these days are so ungrateful

Is this what ja606 has become ?

Tut tut

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator