That's torn it

Why is it a ref can make a complete hash of a job he is being paid handsomely for and not have to answer for his mistakes, or more seriously, his biased approach to a team?

I understand that he can't see everything but surely that's why he has assistants. There is also the benefit of coverage of the game. Do those in charge of the game just take the ref's word on these matters?

Now on to the real point of the article. My question is, was there really any money available to start with?

If there was, it hasn't been spent as yet. Perhaps Lionel Messy may be available on loan.

Considering we are losing money every day I still can't figure out where the alleged money came from. With no hose pipe ban there has not been a reduction in the water bill so it didn't come from there.

I was in the RAF with this referee and his mate who worked in the same section as me raved about him - though having seen some of his efforts back in the day I wasn't sure at all.

This isn't the first time this referee has had a shocker when reffing us.

Though wouldn't any fine come directly from Lennon not the club?

TMP you are assuming NL will get paid this month I don't think the FA accept bottle tops either.

Oh hang on I get it
PG " Listen Neil if you want a player it comes from your wages this month " Phil pulls a fast one and uses the money to pay the phone bill and the money is gone what will PG do now ?