or to join or start a new Discussion

15 Comments
Article Rating 5 Stars

Rashford, should he be starting?

This isn't anything to do with todays defeat, but the lad has a directness and a turn of pace (especially from a standing start) that just scares opponents, I'm not suggesting dropping zlatan as I'm sure we could accommodate both but when he came on today as in every other game he looked a threat and as we all know he can finish.

comment by Elvis (U7425)

posted on 10/9/16

He should be starting. He is the player that out opponents would least like to have running at them and he makes things happen.

posted on 10/9/16

The only bad thing about starting Rashford is that it means you can't bring him on later in the game.

posted on 10/9/16

comment by Jalisco Red - Team PoGBa (U4195)
posted 1 minute ago
The only bad thing about starting Rashford is that it means you can't bring him on later in the game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can live with that.

comment by Beeb (U1841)

posted on 10/9/16

Can he last a whole game, regularly?

posted on 10/9/16

Watched the game in a red pub, and whenever he, or Pogba got the ball, even if it was just a simple pass it was like they had just invented the Cruyff turn... I get that, he's a local lad who fans want to do well, but there was a bloke next to me saying Rashford "changed the pace of the game" when he came on - wrong, United's goal just before half time changed the pace of the game, Rashford 'did' Sagna fairly early on, and after that was kept reasonably well under raps.

posted on 10/9/16

Been saying he should start since the start of the season... We're just hamstringing ourselves any other way.

And he needs to be starting down the middle...

posted on 11/9/16

comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 2 hours, 53 minutes ago
Watched the game in a red pub, and whenever he, or Pogba got the ball, even if it was just a simple pass it was like they had just invented the Cruyff turn... I get that, he's a local lad who fans want to do well, but there was a bloke next to me saying Rashford "changed the pace of the game" when he came on - wrong, United's goal just before half time changed the pace of the game, Rashford 'did' Sagna fairly early on, and after that was kept reasonably well under raps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A red pub?

Surely you weren't in Manc grated?

posted on 11/9/16

Think he should be starting for England too.

comment by Bestie (U1113)

posted on 11/9/16

Personally I'd be cautious with ever throwing too much expectation on someone his age when inconsistency is an inevitable consequence of the age. Ox looked a world beater as a teenager and has regressed badly since, so playing regularly at 19 didn't do him much good. Rashford is probably best served by being your impact sub at the moment IMO.

posted on 12/9/16

Should Rashford be starting? In short, Yes.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 5 from 1 vote

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available