I know all fans want to buy cheap and sell at a premium, but £50m for Sig is daft. We need to walk away, £40m is too much.
posted on 13/7/17
Honestly I think Swansea is his level. He's no better than Barkley who himself seems surplus to requirements
posted on 13/7/17
comment by 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 (U18355)
posted 7 minutes ago
Honestly I think Swansea is his level. He's no better than Barkley who himself seems surplus to requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's far more consistent than Barkley,but I'd take an inform Ross over Sig. Sigs at a higher level than Swansea, I just don't think he's worth anything like £50m.
posted on 13/7/17
I agree, he is a good player and the market is crazy, but he isn't a £40/50 million player.
posted on 14/7/17
I wouldn't entertain paying over £20m for Sig, they are having a serious laugh holding out for £50m!!
If we end up signing him and selling Barkley, I'll be bloody furious
posted on 14/7/17
Said it time and time again.
We have a player who if played as a 10 offers what Sig does.
Spend £40m on a striker and CB.
posted on 16/7/17
"Someone hung-----with YB out" What does this mean?
posted on 16/7/17
Sorry. My error. See Arounas comments in his Post above.