I know all fans want to buy cheap and sell at a premium, but £50m for Sig is daft. We need to walk away, £40m is too much.
Browse:
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted on 13/7/17
Honestly I think Swansea is his level. He's no better than Barkley who himself seems surplus to requirements
posted on 13/7/17
comment by 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 (U18355)
posted 7 minutes ago
Honestly I think Swansea is his level. He's no better than Barkley who himself seems surplus to requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's far more consistent than Barkley,but I'd take an inform Ross over Sig. Sigs at a higher level than Swansea, I just don't think he's worth anything like £50m.
comment by Mr Reasonable (U2320)
posted on 13/7/17
I agree, he is a good player and the market is crazy, but he isn't a £40/50 million player.
comment by L4 BlueNose (U20906)
posted on 14/7/17
I wouldn't entertain paying over £20m for Sig, they are having a serious laugh holding out for £50m!!
If we end up signing him and selling Barkley, I'll be bloody furious
comment by William Kenwright (U1308)
posted on 14/7/17
Said it time and time again.
We have a player who if played as a 10 offers what Sig does.
Spend £40m on a striker and CB.
comment by U1878 SILKY BLUE (U1878)
posted on 16/7/17
"Someone hung-----with YB out" What does this mean?
comment by U1878 SILKY BLUE (U1878)
posted on 16/7/17
Sorry. My error. See Arounas comments in his Post above.
RATE THIS ARTICLE
ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available