11 vs 11 it was pretty even and we we got through a few times, then the red card and tbh it was a walk in the park for City. Disappointing the way we conceded 5, yes down to 10 of course means its difficult but we could have kept it to 2 or 3; turned out to be one of those games.
I said before the game if there is a loser then the defeat wont be terminal, there is so many points to play for, it looks sht and losing by 5 clear goals is awful, even down to 10; but, it is "hopefully" as i mentioned just one of those days, forget it, move on nothing we can do now.
Well done City even if the city fans were more interested in booing Milner and singing the SG song. No doubt the Anfield reverse will be a game not to miss, losing by 5 kinda sticks in the players mind when we next play City.
Sevilla next, lets hope we win and carry on into the next game which is Burnley at home, win both and the City game will be forgotten...in fact, what City game? Already forgot it!
THATS why i rarely bet on games!
posted on 11/9/17
comment by No Love - "The Scousification of the Media" (U1282)
posted 10 hours, 59 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
No Love
Will you do me a favour and write your response to Ttliv on his "City fans" thread that's on Liverpool's 606 board?
--------
Haven't seen it, I'll have a look.
While you're at it, say exactly the same thing to Coutinho's happy feet on this thread. Seeing as they are guilty of the very same thing.
----------
I was replying to a particular comment. Also haven't seen these comments by Coutinho. I'll have a look.
Don't just single out opposition fans for this widespread hypocritical transgression. Have the balls of your own convictions and attack with equal vigour these idiotic fans who support the same club as you.
--------
I will if I deem it fit.
I notice that you seem to agree with my post but I haven't seen you pontificating to fans of other clubs who are pontificating on here.
You ask me to go after my own fans rather than rival fans while you are doing the same thing, I haven't seen you criticise your fellow pontificating fans either so that's just hypocrisy on top of hypocrisy from you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No Love, I didn't ask you to go after your own fans RATHER than rival fans. I asked you to go after both equally. All I asked you to do was to be critical of your own fans in the same way you had been critical of rival fans. It wasn't an either/or scenario for me.
posted on 12/9/17
I responded to a Liverpool fan accusing city fans of singing chants after it was pointed out Liverpool fans booed an injured player off the field
--------
So one is an accusation and the other is pointed out. You're not biased are you?
Is this an example of how past transgressions are ignored?
You went off on a tangent about Liverpool fans ignoring past transgressions which you fail to properly link with current events or provide examples of. What was the relevance of that rant in relation to the topic of this thread? None.
It was just a bitter little rant because you want to waltz in here and say your piece and everyone to agree and marvel at your wisdom and admin to respect you but if challenged you lose your rag and start crying like a baby about admin and Liverpool fans.
It won't stop happening and as your frustration grows, you will get nearer and nearer to a ban as you push harder and harder against a brick wall. Many a veteran like you have fallen prey to this. They rise and rise and then they all cry like babies as they get shot down.
The record plays on.
posted on 12/9/17
No Love, I didn't ask you to go after your own fans RATHER than rival fans. I asked you to go after both equally. All I asked you to do was to be critical of your own fans in the same way you had been critical of rival fans. It wasn't an either/or scenario for me.
-------
Fair enough but it's a bit hypocritical to ask me to do that when you aren't doing it yourself, no?
For instance, do you agree with all of LQs posts? You haven't said anything and we know you can read them.
In your opinion, which is the more urgent rush?
At least I've said things that don't necessarily agree with fellow fans.
You've said nothing about LQs alarming comments and have the audacity to tell me where to start. I'm sorry if I tell you where to go as that's just ridiculous. You're overlooking murder in order to jail a misdemeanour which is shameful IMO.
If you'd had told LQ to shut up before you addressed me, I would agree with you that I need to be fair but seeing as you prefer to pursue a misdemeanour while not noticing a murder, why should I listen to you?
posted on 12/9/17
comment by No Love - "The Scousification of the Media" (U1282)
posted 2 hours, 28 minutes ago
I responded to a Liverpool fan accusing city fans of singing chants after it was pointed out Liverpool fans booed an injured player off the field
--------
So one is an accusation and the other is pointed out. You're not biased are you?
Is this an example of how past transgressions are ignored?
You went off on a tangent about Liverpool fans ignoring past transgressions which you fail to properly link with current events or provide examples of. What was the relevance of that rant in relation to the topic of this thread? None.
It was just a bitter little rant because you want to waltz in here and say your piece and everyone to agree and marvel at your wisdom and admin to respect you but if challenged you lose your rag and start crying like a baby about admin and Liverpool fans.
It won't stop happening and as your frustration grows, you will get nearer and nearer to a ban as you push harder and harder against a brick wall. Many a veteran like you have fallen prey to this. They rise and rise and then they all cry like babies as they get shot down.
The record plays on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it plays on, like I said ashamed of nothing !
That reputation precedes you.
posted on 12/9/17
"I responded to a Liverpool fan accusing city fans of singing chants after it was pointed out Liverpool fans booed an injured player off the field"
Loz' holier then thou attitude encapsulated in one short sentence. You were pointing out but I was making accusations
posted on 12/9/17
Of course it plays on, like I said ashamed of nothing !
That reputation precedes you.
-------
As I said, closer and closer.
Best to pack up and go back to your board now before you're stupidity gets you in a fix that'll have you crying about admin and Liverpool fans for a looooooong time.
Oh wait, you're doing that already.
Go 😢 into your cornflakes.
posted on 12/9/17
comment by Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
"I responded to a Liverpool fan accusing city fans of singing chants after it was pointed out Liverpool fans booed an injured player off the field"
Loz' holier then thou attitude encapsulated in one short sentence. You were pointing out but I was making accusations
----------
Too complex for a single celled organism like him to comprehend. He's primal and acts on instinct which prohibits any ability to rationalise within himself.
posted on 14/9/17
comment by No Love - "The Scousification of the Media" (U1282)
posted 2 days, 18 hours ago
No Love, I didn't ask you to go after your own fans RATHER than rival fans. I asked you to go after both equally. All I asked you to do was to be critical of your own fans in the same way you had been critical of rival fans. It wasn't an either/or scenario for me.
-------
Fair enough but it's a bit hypocritical to ask me to do that when you aren't doing it yourself, no?
For instance, do you agree with all of LQs posts? You haven't said anything and we know you can read them.
In your opinion, which is the more urgent rush?
At least I've said things that don't necessarily agree with fellow fans.
You've said nothing about LQs alarming comments and have the audacity to tell me where to start. I'm sorry if I tell you where to go as that's just ridiculous. You're overlooking murder in order to jail a misdemeanour which is shameful IMO.
If you'd had told LQ to shut up before you addressed me, I would agree with you that I need to be fair but seeing as you prefer to pursue a misdemeanour while not noticing a murder, why should I listen to you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have had a go at LQ before. He'll tell you that himself.
Why do I need to have a go at LQ on this thread though? You've already done that. And I haven't had a dig at you for having a got at LQ either. I haven't defended him against what you said to him. I merely asked you to do me a favour and say the same thing to two posters who had done similar to what LQ and others had done.
That doesn't make me hypocritical. That is simply me asking you to be fair.
posted on 15/9/17
He's had a go at me before I can vouch for that👍
As for the scousification muppet ignore him he's your stereotypical Liverpool fan.
And a bit of a cockwomble to boot!
posted on 15/9/17
comment by No Love - "The Scousification of the Medi... (U1282)
posted 2 days, 23 hours ago
comment by Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
"I responded to a Liverpool fan accusing city fans of singing chants after it was pointed out Liverpool fans booed an injured player off the field"
Loz' holier then thou attitude encapsulated in one short sentence. You were pointing out but I was making accusations
----------
Too complex for a single celled organism like him to comprehend. He's primal and acts on instinct which prohibits any ability to rationalise within himself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You didn't pass GCSE English, did you?