Kane possible to get a ban?
Thought it was all silly and handbags myself. But knowing our luck and after the Mike Dean thing, Kane getting banned with the Arsenal match next is just typical.
Taken from Skysports - full article on their website.
"The FA are waiting on Andre Marriner's referee report before deciding whether to refer an incident of Harry Kane clashing with Cesar Azpilicueta.
The two players were involved in unsavoury incident as tempers flared in the match at Stamford Bridge.
Kane was seen motioning his head in the direction of the Chelsea captain, as words were exchanged and the referee was forced to intervene.
The incident occurred after defender David Luiz took exception to Kane's heavy pressure to win back the ball, after Spurs had returned possession following Chelsea kicking into touch to allow Kieran Trippier to receive treatment".
When it rains it pours
posted on 28/2/19
Big blow for Arsenal, Kane hat trick incoming.
posted on 28/2/19
comment by NPE ⚽️ (U22020)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Doovdé™ (U2996)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by NPE ⚽️ (U22020)
posted 4 minutes ago
Why? Most the time it goes to the defenders not the GK, why is Kane putting pressure on like a doosh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because Luiz had the ball for 10 seconds and had 3-4 touches.
The moment the ball is played back and the opposition takes a touch, it's game on.
If Luiz wants to intercept a pass that was intended for the keeper and fack around with it, then that's his problem. Kane has every right to challenge for the ball.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why is he hitting it back to the keeper, what a clot. Luiz was just trying to correct a ridiculous pass when we kicked the ball out from a promising attack after Trippiers dive.
Whatever, I will just leave it, like you wanted Luiz to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wasn't a ridiculous pass though, was it? The keeper was 20 yards behind moving out to collect the ball - the keeper can also use his hands to collect the ball But no, Luiz had to intercept the ball, make a facking right mess of it, then moans that he's been challenged.
posted on 28/2/19
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 1 hour, 20 minutes ago
If Luiz hadn't touched it the ball would have gone back to the keeper in his box. Kane wouldn't have chased it down without the Luiz intervention.
Not sure what you want players to do, just sit back and let the defender waste time?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn’t have kicked it out DJ
posted on 28/2/19
Losing Kane would be a blessing in disguise
The balance of the team isn't there when you have all your best forwards/attacking mids on the pitch at once. Poch doesn't seem to be able to drop a top player so this makes the decision for him
posted on 28/2/19
We will have him!
posted on 28/2/19
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/2/19
comment by Scruttocks (U19684)
posted 11 minutes ago
Losing Kane would be a blessing in disguise
The balance of the team isn't there when you have all your best forwards/attacking mids on the pitch at once. Poch doesn't seem to be able to drop a top player so this makes the decision for him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is quite amusing how everyone said Spurs would collapse without Kane, then they coped admirably winning every game in his absence and now he’s back they’ve lost two on the bounce
posted on 28/2/19
There was never any chance golden boy would get banned. I'm glad he didn't, would have been more wary with Son as the main man
posted on 28/2/19
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Scruttocks (U19684)
posted 11 minutes ago
Losing Kane would be a blessing in disguise
The balance of the team isn't there when you have all your best forwards/attacking mids on the pitch at once. Poch doesn't seem to be able to drop a top player so this makes the decision for him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is quite amusing how everyone said Spurs would collapse without Kane, then they coped admirably winning every game in his absence and now he’s back they’ve lost two on the bounce
----------------------------------------------------------------------
was very lazy punditry
posted on 1/3/19
comment by Scruttocks (U19684)
posted 16 hours, 20 minutes ago
Losing Kane would be a blessing in disguise
The balance of the team isn't there when you have all your best forwards/attacking mids on the pitch at once. Poch doesn't seem to be able to drop a top player so this makes the decision for him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So losing one of the worlds best strikers is a blessing in disguise. Honestly do you believe the nonsense you post.