From an outside POV this is what it's looked like many times this season. No argument he's a truly brilliant player but for me Son has been the better striker when given the full responsibility this season. Then when Kane is in the side the balance looks off.
Assume everyone disagrees but would be interesting to hear your thoughts.
Better without Kane?
posted on 10/4/19
We did well in the 7 games when Kane was out then we only took 1 point from 15 on his return so one man does not make a team he will be greatly missed but let us show our other players the respect they deserve they will do the job in a professional manner - COYS !!
posted on 10/4/19
If we get given a penalty kick, and Harry Kane ain't on the pitch to take it, who will you choose?
This thread is pure idiocy.
The team is obviously stronger with Kane on the pitch.
His absence is going to be a great loss.
And I will predict now that we will lose both of the coming matches with ManCity.
—————-
Ted, taking over Chicken’s role as the pessimistic voice of doom all the time
posted on 10/4/19
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 11 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 19 minutes ago
If we get given a penalty kick, and Harry Kane ain't on the pitch to take it, who will you choose?
This thread is pure idiocy.
The team is obviously stronger with Kane on the pitch.
His absence is going to be a great loss.
And I will predict now that we will lose both of the coming matches with ManCity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ted, why would we not expect you to say Spurs will lose both matches. You are the most negative Spurs supporter on the board. Never heard you ever say Spurs will win a game, or even anything positive about the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Voice of doom?
Kane out, Alli injured, Lamela missing, Dembele gone, Aurier back in jail?
Gotta hope Son can do it all and our back four stay together!
And Pep doesn't make any more management errors like keeping De Bruyne on the bench too long.
Not too much of a stretch to bet that we'll lose both matches up in Manchester, is it?
posted on 10/4/19
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 11 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 19 minutes ago
If we get given a penalty kick, and Harry Kane ain't on the pitch to take it, who will you choose?
This thread is pure idiocy.
The team is obviously stronger with Kane on the pitch.
His absence is going to be a great loss.
And I will predict now that we will lose both of the coming matches with ManCity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ted, why would we not expect you to say Spurs will lose both matches. You are the most negative Spurs supporter on the board. Never heard you ever say Spurs will win a game, or even anything positive about the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Voice of doom?
Kane out, Alli injured, Lamela missing, Dembele gone, Aurier back in jail?
Gotta hope Son can do it all and our back four stay together!
And Pep doesn't make any more management errors like keeping De Bruyne on the bench too long.
Not too much of a stretch to bet that we'll lose both matches up in Manchester, is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh yes, and Trip Trip Trippier!! Hooray!
Gotta hope Sissoko can keep coming over his side and baling him out.
posted on 10/4/19
Sandy, I have to ask......
now honestly .... given the situation... do you expect Spurs to go up to Manchester and win anything against City?
I'm saying we lose both matches, best possibility would be a 2-1 loss in the CL. Then we go through. A 1-1 draw would be over the moon.
In the league we're fighting for fourth now.
People underestimate Kane's value to our team. He's not just a striker. He's an all court hardworker and he draws double and triple teaming which means other players can get away from their minders.
Pochettino should be request a VAR revue of that stamping his ankle got. Its a retrospective red card in my book.
posted on 11/4/19
Better without Kane!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Really?
I bet Barca are better without Messi as well
posted on 11/4/19
Grandspurs.................//where has anyone said we are better without Harry?
It was a fair question based on previous periods when he has been missing. The facts show we have not suffered when he is out, however he is our ONLY World Class player & I would always prefer to see him in the team.
Ted.............I don’t think there was any malice in Delph’s challenge, if anything Harry was the one who was a bit late and thus got himself injured
posted on 11/4/19
comment by GeniusGreaves (U1302)
posted 3 minutes ago
Grandspurs.................//where has anyone said we are better without Harry?
It was a fair question based on previous periods when he has been missing. The facts show we have not suffered when he is out, however he is our ONLY World Class player & I would always prefer to see him in the team.
Ted.............I don’t think there was any malice in Delph’s challenge, if anything Harry was the one who was a bit late and thus got himself injured
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite the way I saw it, genius.
And why the same ankle?
They were banging Kane about all night. Referees have got to start protecting marquee players by giving cards out the first time this sort of thing happens - before the ankle stamping.
posted on 12/4/19
Grandspurs.................//where has anyone said we are better without Harry?
-------------------------------------------------------------
Not you but reread the comments in the article its there
posted on 12/4/19
We do play better without Kane especially post first injury.
-------------------------------------------------------------
genius, thats the comment