or to join or start a new Discussion

253 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

Greenwood 2

First. How could he? I don't profess any special goodness, super ethics or morality. But some things, child cruelty for example, seem inexplicable.
What could have been going through his head, he's young, famous, rich, he could have had loads of women, so why?


Second. No not all footballers are the same, I'm sure the majority are decent:

Third. Can we fire him but keep his registration so he can't play for anyone else? I don't know how it works.

posted on 1/2/22

comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 46 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 3 hours, 42 minutes ago

My interpretation of the audio.

He tries to instigate s3x. She is upset with him over something (possibly him being unfaithful). He crudely pursues her for s3x. She is initially reluctant, but eventually, for want of a better word, complies.

Would I be happy with my daughter being treated this way, hell no. Does it constitute rape, Im not sure.

Add Comment | Complain | Share

I have him filtered so please could somebody report this comment, in which RDD accuses a r*pe victim of complying, on my behalf please
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unflilter him then report him.

He hasn't actually been found guilty yet, well, not by the courts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that audio is enough to convict him of rape tbh. I'm not a lawyer, but there is no evidence of rape from what I heard? Vulgar as he comes across.

They'll most probably get the GBH charge if enough people testify that Mason beat her up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I guess it will depend on the rest of the recording and whether the police have access to it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmmm. So you accept that opinion from Busby, but not from me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Different things. I didn't accept your interpretation of the audio available to us. And I clearly said earlier that assuming s3x took place, the audio was enough for rape.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Having listened to the audio, iv said im.not sure it constitutes rape, which enraged you.

Busbh said the same and thats OK.

Weak
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no. Your interpretation was that in the end she complied to have s3x. Even though the last thing we hear is Mason threatening her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Threatening to do what though?

comment by Elvis (U7425)

posted on 1/2/22

comment by Don (U22703)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 46 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 3 hours, 42 minutes ago

My interpretation of the audio.

He tries to instigate s3x. She is upset with him over something (possibly him being unfaithful). He crudely pursues her for s3x. She is initially reluctant, but eventually, for want of a better word, complies.

Would I be happy with my daughter being treated this way, hell no. Does it constitute rape, Im not sure.

Add Comment | Complain | Share

I have him filtered so please could somebody report this comment, in which RDD accuses a r*pe victim of complying, on my behalf please
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unflilter him then report him.

He hasn't actually been found guilty yet, well, not by the courts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that audio is enough to convict him of rape tbh. I'm not a lawyer, but there is no evidence of rape from what I heard? Vulgar as he comes across.

They'll most probably get the GBH charge if enough people testify that Mason beat her up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I guess it will depend on the rest of the recording and whether the police have access to it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmmm. So you accept that opinion from Busby, but not from me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Different things. I didn't accept your interpretation of the audio available to us. And I clearly said earlier that assuming s3x took place, the audio was enough for rape.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Having listened to the audio, iv said im.not sure it constitutes rape, which enraged you.

Busbh said the same and thats OK.

Weak
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no. Your interpretation was that in the end she complied to have s3x. Even though the last thing we hear is Mason threatening her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Threatening to do what though?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tickle her? Buy her a dozen read roses? What does it matter? There was no suggestion of her complying you fecking beast.

posted on 1/2/22

comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 46 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 3 hours, 42 minutes ago

My interpretation of the audio.

He tries to instigate s3x. She is upset with him over something (possibly him being unfaithful). He crudely pursues her for s3x. She is initially reluctant, but eventually, for want of a better word, complies.

Would I be happy with my daughter being treated this way, hell no. Does it constitute rape, Im not sure.

Add Comment | Complain | Share

I have him filtered so please could somebody report this comment, in which RDD accuses a r*pe victim of complying, on my behalf please
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unflilter him then report him.

He hasn't actually been found guilty yet, well, not by the courts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that audio is enough to convict him of rape tbh. I'm not a lawyer, but there is no evidence of rape from what I heard? Vulgar as he comes across.

They'll most probably get the GBH charge if enough people testify that Mason beat her up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I guess it will depend on the rest of the recording and whether the police have access to it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmmm. So you accept that opinion from Busby, but not from me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Different things. I didn't accept your interpretation of the audio available to us. And I clearly said earlier that assuming s3x took place, the audio was enough for rape.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Having listened to the audio, iv said im.not sure it constitutes rape, which enraged you.

Busbh said the same and thats OK.

Weak
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no. Your interpretation was that in the end she complied to have s3x. Even though the last thing we hear is Mason threatening her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Threatening to do what though?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tickle her? Buy her a dozen read roses? What does it matter? There was no suggestion of her complying you fecking beast.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There we go. You are assuming he threatened her with violence, but are raging that i have suggest3d she may have eventually consented

comment by Elvis (U7425)

posted on 1/2/22

comment by Don (U22703)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 46 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 3 hours, 42 minutes ago

My interpretation of the audio.

He tries to instigate s3x. She is upset with him over something (possibly him being unfaithful). He crudely pursues her for s3x. She is initially reluctant, but eventually, for want of a better word, complies.

Would I be happy with my daughter being treated this way, hell no. Does it constitute rape, Im not sure.

Add Comment | Complain | Share

I have him filtered so please could somebody report this comment, in which RDD accuses a r*pe victim of complying, on my behalf please
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unflilter him then report him.

He hasn't actually been found guilty yet, well, not by the courts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that audio is enough to convict him of rape tbh. I'm not a lawyer, but there is no evidence of rape from what I heard? Vulgar as he comes across.

They'll most probably get the GBH charge if enough people testify that Mason beat her up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I guess it will depend on the rest of the recording and whether the police have access to it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmmm. So you accept that opinion from Busby, but not from me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Different things. I didn't accept your interpretation of the audio available to us. And I clearly said earlier that assuming s3x took place, the audio was enough for rape.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Having listened to the audio, iv said im.not sure it constitutes rape, which enraged you.

Busbh said the same and thats OK.

Weak
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no. Your interpretation was that in the end she complied to have s3x. Even though the last thing we hear is Mason threatening her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Threatening to do what though?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tickle her? Buy her a dozen read roses? What does it matter? There was no suggestion of her complying you fecking beast.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There we go. You are assuming he threatened her with violence, but are raging that i have suggest3d she may have eventually consented
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he threatened her with violence.

And you didn't say she might have eventually consented after the audio ends. You said that your take on the audio was that she did consent from what we heard. Big difference you fecking pervert.

posted on 1/2/22

comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 46 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 3 hours, 42 minutes ago

My interpretation of the audio.

He tries to instigate s3x. She is upset with him over something (possibly him being unfaithful). He crudely pursues her for s3x. She is initially reluctant, but eventually, for want of a better word, complies.

Would I be happy with my daughter being treated this way, hell no. Does it constitute rape, Im not sure.

Add Comment | Complain | Share

I have him filtered so please could somebody report this comment, in which RDD accuses a r*pe victim of complying, on my behalf please
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unflilter him then report him.

He hasn't actually been found guilty yet, well, not by the courts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that audio is enough to convict him of rape tbh. I'm not a lawyer, but there is no evidence of rape from what I heard? Vulgar as he comes across.

They'll most probably get the GBH charge if enough people testify that Mason beat her up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I guess it will depend on the rest of the recording and whether the police have access to it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmmm. So you accept that opinion from Busby, but not from me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Different things. I didn't accept your interpretation of the audio available to us. And I clearly said earlier that assuming s3x took place, the audio was enough for rape.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Having listened to the audio, iv said im.not sure it constitutes rape, which enraged you.

Busbh said the same and thats OK.

Weak
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no. Your interpretation was that in the end she complied to have s3x. Even though the last thing we hear is Mason threatening her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Threatening to do what though?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tickle her? Buy her a dozen read roses? What does it matter? There was no suggestion of her complying you fecking beast.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There we go. You are assuming he threatened her with violence, but are raging that i have suggest3d she may have eventually consented
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he threatened her with violence.

And you didn't say she might have eventually consented after the audio ends. You said that your take on the audio was that she did consent from what we heard. Big difference you fecking pervert.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes. Having heard the tape, i concluded that.... same way you concluded he threatened violence, despite there being no threat of violence.

comment by Elvis (U7425)

posted on 1/2/22

comment by Don (U22703)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 46 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 3 hours, 42 minutes ago

My interpretation of the audio.

He tries to instigate s3x. She is upset with him over something (possibly him being unfaithful). He crudely pursues her for s3x. She is initially reluctant, but eventually, for want of a better word, complies.

Would I be happy with my daughter being treated this way, hell no. Does it constitute rape, Im not sure.

Add Comment | Complain | Share

I have him filtered so please could somebody report this comment, in which RDD accuses a r*pe victim of complying, on my behalf please
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unflilter him then report him.

He hasn't actually been found guilty yet, well, not by the courts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that audio is enough to convict him of rape tbh. I'm not a lawyer, but there is no evidence of rape from what I heard? Vulgar as he comes across.

They'll most probably get the GBH charge if enough people testify that Mason beat her up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I guess it will depend on the rest of the recording and whether the police have access to it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmmm. So you accept that opinion from Busby, but not from me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Different things. I didn't accept your interpretation of the audio available to us. And I clearly said earlier that assuming s3x took place, the audio was enough for rape.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Having listened to the audio, iv said im.not sure it constitutes rape, which enraged you.

Busbh said the same and thats OK.

Weak
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no. Your interpretation was that in the end she complied to have s3x. Even though the last thing we hear is Mason threatening her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Threatening to do what though?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tickle her? Buy her a dozen read roses? What does it matter? There was no suggestion of her complying you fecking beast.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There we go. You are assuming he threatened her with violence, but are raging that i have suggest3d she may have eventually consented
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he threatened her with violence.

And you didn't say she might have eventually consented after the audio ends. You said that your take on the audio was that she did consent from what we heard. Big difference you fecking pervert.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes. Having heard the tape, i concluded that.... same way you concluded he threatened violence, despite there being no threat of violence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course there was a threat of violence. Only a wrong un would say different.

comment by Cloggy (U1250)

posted on 1/2/22

Obtuse comes to mind. RDD is the Shawshank warden.

posted on 2/2/22

comment by Don (U22703)
posted 12 hours, 23 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Don (U22703)
posted 1 minute ago
Anyway. I’m bored now, as I’m sure everyone else is with this.

We both have differing views of what might have happened, and how legally this would be defined, which is fine. It was you who started with the character assassination as though I somehow condoned such behaviour.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You understanding of what does and doesn't constitute rape is worrying. I can only hope that it is some sick wum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

My interpretation is that she initially didn’t give consent but that may have changed. Consent doesn’t have to be given verbally. It can be expressed verbally or through nonverbal cues, such as positive body language like smiling, maintaining eye contact, and nodding. Information that we aren’t privy to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



This is worse than Boris's defence of the Lockdown Parties.

You should go work for Boris. He'd love you

posted on 23/2/22

Third. Can we fire him but keep his registration so he can't play for anyone else? I don't know how it works.

--

Such a clause would be unlawful

But if found guilty in a court of law, I would imagine that would warrant a breach of his contract of services at Utd therefore lead to him being sacked.

Once he's served time I doubt very much any club in the top flight in pro footy would want to hire him in fear of backlash from fans, from the community and from sponsors.

Rehabilitation is a big part of serving time but there are certain heinous crime that society very seldom forgives especially from highly paid footballers who are seen as role models. Society expects the highest moral standards. Which parent would want their Billy to worship a "rapist"? No one!

posted on 24/2/22

Second. No not all footballers are the same, I'm sure the majority are decent:

---

Vast majority are, I'm sure.

I don't know enough about Mason, his family background etc. What he did reflects badly on him, his family, Utd even, men in society generally that mistreats women and objectifies them.

Mal treatment of women is a societal issue. No different to bigotry being a societal issue. What makes it OK for a 19 year old lad to behave like that towards a female? If he can do that at that age then imagine what he will be like in years to come with more wealth under his belt. He needs the right punishment to rehabilitate him. The other danger is, if his career is shot then he may care very little and re-offend!

There were stories that he fell out with CR7, his attitude was poor. What should have set alarm bells was how he behaved on International duty. Now looking back, England did the right thing, Utd should have thrown the book at him at the time but shielded him. SAF would have handled it differently.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available