The Athletic are reporting that we have a real interest in Raphinha as well as an option for our attacking signing over the summer.
Of the two attacking players now linked with us who would you rather have Richarlison or Raphinha.
If I had to choose personally I would go for Raphinha simply because he’s almost always impressed me when I’ve watched him play and he’s pretty decent on set pieces and seems like the more versatile of the two. I’d say Richarlison could be the better finisher, but overall I’d definitely prefer the forward man from Leeds.
Thoughts?
Richarlison or Raphinha
posted on 14/6/22
comment by Bãles left boot (U22081)
posted 56 seconds ago
Why would we waste money on Dybala or Upamecano?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they are the best in their business, and.......
we want to win stuff!
Also....remember what you said a few minutes ago.....
"We don't need to buy cheap, though. For all the Levy moans when he finally gives us money to spend we moan about spending it."
And now you start moaning about wasting money.
posted on 14/6/22
comment by Dave&Danny (U4428)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Bãles left boot (U22081)
posted 3 minutes ago
Those Hungarian forwards are good, better than what we're looking at
---
I'm curious to hear your reasoning for this. Because I'm sure you wouldn't judge a player from one performance in international football alone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you watched the match, you'd see the player!
Made Harry Kane look static.
Been scoring in the Bundesleague too.
All this talk about Richarlsson et al, when Levy can go get this guy for a tenth of the price.
And have money left over for .....well,....erm....Dybala?
Or Upamecano?
Or ....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Off season friendly of no significance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tell THAT to Southgate!
He will strangle you.
posted on 14/6/22
Well now I just feel silly. Good point, Ted
posted on 15/6/22
Raphinha because he ain't a c*nt
posted on 15/6/22
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 10 hours, 7 minutes ago
Off 40m and Winks for Richarlison. If they reject then move on.
Would like Jesus if not but can see him wanting a guaranteed starter role
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We could try offering Harry Winks plus the next player like Harry Winks who comes through the academy.
posted on 15/6/22
Raphinha is better but we need Richarlison more
He can cover Son and Kane whereas Raphinha can only play in Kulu's position, who deserves to be first choice next season
posted on 15/6/22
Neither really.
One plays in a position where we already have enough quality, with Kulu probably a better player anyway. The other one is probably the worst cheat I have seen. Spends an average of 60 minutes on the floor pretending he is almost dead.
Many better options out there for the £150m to be spent on.
posted on 15/6/22
comment by Analog (U17200)
posted 46 minutes ago
Raphinha is better but we need Richarlison more
He can cover Son and Kane whereas Raphinha can only play in Kulu's position, who deserves to be first choice next season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How about:
Son, Kane, Kulu, Raphina & Richarlson
Currently we have the front 3 + Lucas & Bergy...just get rid of the latter 2 and have legit options on the bench.
Add Eriksen to Bissouma in the middle & get rid of Winks, GLC & NDomb.
Spend big on a LCB and get rid of Rodon or Sanchez.
posted on 15/6/22
I`d take either, both are proven PL players so way less risk than spending big money on a player from abroad with no PL experience
posted on 15/6/22
Richarlison could turn into a player like Son if he had a hard manager, one that got stuck into him for being a little wuss.