or to join or start a new Discussion

Browse: Football  Premier League  Liverpool 
6 Comments
Article Rating 1 Star

Titletastic!!!

by Got_Better (U6241)

After going 30yrs without a title..its only TWO in 6 yrs fellas! Slotastic eh🥳🥳🥳🥳.

And four games to go after today....we absolutely tw@tted the rest of the league, one by one they fell away.

City....bye👋
Chelsea..bye 👋
Forest..bye👋
Arsenal...bye👋

None could keep up with the Liverpool machine consistency, new manager new playing identity, how magnificent.

Just to add to the amazing day today, the little cherry on the top....I am LOVING the rival bitter tears streaming down their faces, mwah..mwah..mwah..its a weak league yeah.....no English teams in European football this year is there! 😂😂😂.

What a great day.......A GREAT DAY...YNWA🤘🤘🤘🤘

posted on 27/4/25

2 in 5 years

posted on 27/4/25

Big clubs are more interested in Europan trophies at this stage of the season. Leagues are for wimps.

posted on 27/4/25

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 12 minutes ago
Big clubs are more interested in Europan trophies at this stage of the season. Leagues are for wimps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂😂😂😂😂😂......your not even a big club you muppet, your 16th in the Premier league ffs...lost around 50% of your games🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.

Your a joke 😂😂😂

posted on 27/4/25

2 in 33 years is poor for such a huge club, and the covid year doesn`t really count

posted on 27/4/25

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 59 minutes ago
Big clubs are more interested in Europan trophies at this stage of the season. Leagues are for wimps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We’ll remind you of this comment when you’re celebrating Spurs winning the league…. oh wait

posted on 27/4/25

comment by PatrikBerger`sHair (U23106)
posted 10 minutes ago
2 in 33 years is poor for such a huge club, and the covid year doesn`t really count
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's wrong with 2 in 5?
Or 13 in 52?
Or 20 in 113?

View all 6 comments  |  Back to Top
Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
5 Votes

Average Rating: 1 from 5 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available