Apparently, Blair Sturrock is supposed to be getting a new contract. Why should he get a new contract?. Not only is he one of the worst strikers i have ever seen but we have 5 strikers already and Paul wants to bring another one in. why? We have got harris, corr, asante, crawford and patterson. 5 good strikers i feel that we dont need 7 strikers (well 6 if paterson leaves) isn't it a waste of money if Blair gets a new contract and we get a new striker in?
posted on 24/6/11
I agree! Thought Blair was poor in the majority of his games - although many will argue he is good at holding the ball up!
To continue with Blair for me, only admits that we are nothing more than a mid to lower L2 team - he brings nothing to the table and has just stood in the way of the likes of Paterson and Crawford.
I understand that Corr is considering a move elsewhere and I hope that the club do the honourable thing and pay Paterson his contract up and let him leave, a waste of a fine talent. Crawford won't hang around either.
posted on 25/6/11
Feel sorry for you guys that he is still with you. I've seen him play probably around twenty games across the years for the likes of Plymouth, Kidderminster, Swindon and you, and I've yet to see him have anything like a decent game. He put a good goal away against us last season at the Pirelli, but otherwise nothing.
Think you've made one of the better signings of the summer though in Harris - his experience and reading of the game is still as good as ever, plus I think he'll score for fun in L2.