Lock Him Up.

no one forced you to read.

Where have I said I did 47?

then why do you want to ban the whole British media?

what are you on mate??....., I havent said that, I think that comment was from another poster The vast majoirty of the british media isnt obbsessed with "allegations" and trash-talk as some tabloids that have been quoted on here over the last few days

The word of the media can never been taken as factual in most instances than not..
--
tell me a percentage

tell me a percentage
_________________________________

I'd be a hypocrite if i tried. Not possible. Dont know. Quite frankly dont want to know either......Esp, when it comes to tabloids and gutter-press like the daily mail and co

"Hopefully the selectors can see that it was a stupid idea to drop Kaneria. I really don't like the way he gets treated by the PCB. Ajmal is good, only economical, but does not pick up enough wickets. He should be kept at ODIs and T20s... just like Saqlain."

That's what I said on the old 606 during the Eng-Pak series in 2010... Braaaaaaaap!

all fingers are not alike. then there's no media then no freedom of speech. if you don't like it then don't take part in that societ

.............................................................................................


I do not like those papers hurling baseless allegations against OURS, not yours, eminent cricketers.IMO, sometimes it is better to respond than simply ignoring it.

Bob Willis in the post day1 chat of 1st test(when Ajmal picked 7) in Sky tv said that he only has problem with Ajmal's doosra not his conventional off spin but the fact is ,in his conventional off spin the arm bends more ( still within legal limits) than when he bowls the doosra. Gower (the anchor),within few minutes, in the same programme posed the question about the legality of Ajmal's action to Bumble as well.

Now I will be doing disservice to the society that I represent if I do not express contradictory views against those who have one foot in their grave.That is FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

Lets talk personal opinions here, thats what the forum is for.
and i personally from what i have seen, believe him to be an outright deadset "Chucker" !

i also cannot understand how or why his action could be considered legal in any form of cricket.

just my humble sports loving opinion

I do not like those papers hurling baseless allegations against OURS, not yours, eminent cricketers.IMO, sometimes it is better to respond than simply ignoring it.
--

Do you have a problem with newspapers or Sky?

next thing you are going to say is all those no-balls are bowled by British media.