Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Well I didn't see anything that proved it was a bad decision there.
Broad bowled a no-ball when he thought he'd taken the final wicket and then the wheels fell off.
Cooky gone, just 208.1 overs to go to save the match
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Well this appeal wasn't very convincing neon so it should be not out
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Just 207 Overs to go to save the match
I would have thought Cook had learnt its not a good idea to hit a spinner through square leg from outside off.
I didn't see a clear deviation.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Surely Randhiv should be bowling ahead of Dilshan?
205 Overs to go
Neon that is the most laughable comment I've seen from you in a while
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Listening on tms today while writing my dissertation at uni. Devastated i can't watch it. We looking comfortable at the min?
Strauss needs to stop playing back so often, otherwise it's just a matter of time.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
This is the point where I say 'was it conclusive'? 'could you be sure? Could the 3rd umpire be absolutely sure his mate had got it wrong?'
This is a cricket forum, there's every point in going on about it.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Neon, staying on the back foot, playing the ball late and waiting for it to fully turn is OK (like subcontinent players do), but England's top order like to take the ball early, yet are playing on the back foot, a recipe for disaster.
You have laugh when Trott got bundled to the ground by Prasana J yesterday. It was like watching football.
296 to go.
Sign in if you want to comment
SL v Eng - Day 3
Page 4 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 28/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/3/12
no Hotspot!!
posted on 28/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/3/12
Well I didn't see anything that proved it was a bad decision there.
posted on 28/3/12
Broad bowled a no-ball when he thought he'd taken the final wicket and then the wheels fell off.
Cooky gone, just 208.1 overs to go to save the match
posted on 28/3/12
did he hit it?
posted on 28/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/3/12
Well this appeal wasn't very convincing neon so it should be not out
posted on 28/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/3/12
Just 207 Overs to go to save the match
posted on 28/3/12
I would have thought Cook had learnt its not a good idea to hit a spinner through square leg from outside off.
posted on 28/3/12
I didn't see a clear deviation.
posted on 28/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/3/12
Surely Randhiv should be bowling ahead of Dilshan?
205 Overs to go
posted on 28/3/12
Neon that is the most laughable comment I've seen from you in a while
posted on 28/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/3/12
Listening on tms today while writing my dissertation at uni. Devastated i can't watch it. We looking comfortable at the min?
posted on 28/3/12
Strauss needs to stop playing back so often, otherwise it's just a matter of time.
posted on 28/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/3/12
This is the point where I say 'was it conclusive'? 'could you be sure? Could the 3rd umpire be absolutely sure his mate had got it wrong?'
This is a cricket forum, there's every point in going on about it.
posted on 28/3/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/3/12
Neon, staying on the back foot, playing the ball late and waiting for it to fully turn is OK (like subcontinent players do), but England's top order like to take the ball early, yet are playing on the back foot, a recipe for disaster.
posted on 28/3/12
You have laugh when Trott got bundled to the ground by Prasana J yesterday. It was like watching football.
296 to go.
Page 4 of 8
6 | 7 | 8