by your logic; the same could be said about Lewis, Button and webber, meaning Vettel is the best because he has not chocked as of yet.

you might be right GB90

In 07 you would hardly say that Alonso was outclassed by Hamilton but you could say that Hamilton proved more than a match for Alonso.


You my good sir are the WUM and you know it

Move along, nothing to see here

This here is proof positive that if you twist things just right, you can make any World class driver sound like an average no-hoper.

Daredevil is adamant that Vettel only wins when he has a car that's a second per lap faster than everyone else's (and in his defence, there's not a lot of evidence that says otherwise yet)

tsheporam was adamant that Button fluked the '09 title, and then tried to accuse Whitmarsh of sabotaging Hamilton when Button outperformed him last year.

I've seen people say that the only reason Schumacher dominated in the early 00's was because Ferrari had almost exclusive access to the upcoming season's tyres, meaning they could be tailored purely to his driving style.

I wouldn't be surprised if there's people out there who think the likes of Jim Clark and Ayrton Senna weren't all they were cracked up to be as well.

Sometimes they say it to get a rise, sometimes they just can't handle it when they get proven wrong.

^^

Kim Clarke

Jim Clarke ffs, Jim. Stoopid autocorrect