or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 31 comments are related to an article called:

Andy will never beat Nole or Fed in a slam

Page 1 of 2

posted on 10/9/12

He will today. Bookmark.

posted on 10/9/12

Then after tonight, it will be....... "but, but, but Andy will never win Wimbledon though" All you Murray haters must be bricking it

posted on 10/9/12

Murray is in great form and Novak played yesterday this is a massive chance. Come on Andy!

posted on 10/9/12

What channel/time is it on tonight?

posted on 10/9/12

All you Murray haters must be bricking it

==============

I am, i admit it. I hate that bloke & hope he never wins anything more in his career.

In saying that, he's good enough to win loads - its just i hope he dont.

posted on 10/9/12

What a thoroughly ridiculous article. Even if Murray loses tonight he'll get one soon. Federer will retire soon, Nadal's knees are shot and the newest crop of young players are crap. Get used to these Murray-Djokovic finals cause there's going to be plenty. Only Del Potro can disrupt it.

posted on 10/9/12

Cmon Dkokovic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

posted on 10/9/12

Everyone forgets feds first 10 or so finals were against Old or retiring or injured players.

Murray will win loads of slams once he gets his first out of the way and the Olympics will have kick started the process.

posted on 10/9/12

Everyone forgets feds first 10 or so finals were against Old or retiring or injured players

==================

Was Fed the only non-injured, non-retiring player on the scene then?

posted on 10/9/12

Pretty much Chicken tbh.

posted on 10/9/12

Castle,

Turn it in.

posted on 10/9/12

To be fair,Federer never had a challenge until Rafa came along! Its ok beating Roddick, Hewitt and an ageing Aggasi, but did he really have a challenge?

posted on 10/9/12

LogieB

Every era is the same. You have to be better than every player out there. Fed was. Murray isn't.

posted on 10/9/12

Agree, you do have to be better against the other players out there.

But it does help when the other players are not anywhere near the level required. I have not doubt Murray would have won his fair share of slams in that era as well..

Murray was beating Roddick, Hewitt and Safin at an early age. Im sure an ageing Agassi, or a limited Phillipousos would not have given Murray any sleepless night either!!

posted on 10/9/12

"What a thoroughly ridiculous article. Even if Murray loses tonight he'll get one soon. Federer will retire soon, Nadal's knees are shot and the newest crop of young players are crap. Get used to these Murray-Djokovic finals cause there's going to be plenty. Only Del Potro can disrupt it"

The newest crop of young players are crap?
Hmm...not sure I agree with that,theres loads of up and coming talent

comment by Jonty (U4614)

posted on 10/9/12

Vee jay, nice to see you being positive for once!

posted on 10/9/12

Exactly LogieB, fed started at a transitional time and no-one wasn't old or injured or just krap at that time until Rafa came along.

posted on 10/9/12

Like who? Of the players talked up none of them look up to much. Raonic better hope for players that can't return because other than his serve, he's a joke. Dimitrov has done nothing and Tomic apparently has an attitude problem. Who else is around that is realistically going to win Slam's?

comment by WOW (U14335)

posted on 10/9/12

veejay

posted on 11/9/12

what an idiot!!!

posted on 11/9/12

Absolute pillock

comment by Jonty (U4614)

posted on 11/9/12

can't argue with those assessments of edooem.

posted on 11/9/12

Do you want to delete this post yet? Oh wise guy.

Your credibility as a tennis guru just went in the toilet.

posted on 11/9/12

Maksi

comment by OOE (U3473)

posted on 11/9/12

New userid coming up in 5....4....3....

Page 1 of 2

Sign in if you want to comment