Yeah course you would take that.
Rangers get investigated by a team of lawyers over months. Yet we are led to believe Celtic get investigated by one guy on his own over a few days.
Then he reports to the SPL commission which includes Celtic, but yeah it's all above board! FFS.
Aye we got fined hoops.
Timi...Case is closed,no more said on the matter
It's quite pathetic..they sound a bit bitter because they don't have that card to throw at us now
Let's face it the club who had their EBT managed by an ex deputy governor of the Bank of England were found to have operated the scheme correctly...whereas the club who had their EBT managed on the advice from a poornstar have a "case to answer to" and are under investigation.
What is so shocking about that?
Well, nothing really.
But if it suits you to believe it's all a conspiracy against Rangers, then so be it.
Henke..I reckon they are dreading October
Castle
Celtic used the EBT to pay for Juninho's severence pay AFTER his contract was over,what is so difficult for you to understand about that,that is why we were cleared because we did nothing wrong spit your dummy out all you like but thems the facts mister.
" U ain't goin nowhere bluenose ya cant"
Naw, I'm done.
I actually hope it's not above board and Celtic are guilty. Just to annoy the wee bares that little bit more.
Chuckle chuckle.
They wouldn't have paid an ebt after it was over that's why. It wouldn't be an EBT then.
it was an end of contract settlement
So you admit Celtic are innocent then Castle?
It wouldn't have been an EBT then. What part of that don't you get?
They wouldn't have paid an ebt after it was over that's why. It wouldn't be an EBT then.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not?
You gave Souness one ten years after he left, and obviously the SPL can't convict you for that.
But if Celtic did it...then it must be an evil agenda against Rangers.
Celtic listed an EBT in their accounts. This is why this severance is utter made up bullocks.
Yer a decent poster Castle..but seriously tonight you are embarassing
Souness wasn't playing for us henrik. An EBT is a tax free loan. If it was paid as severence to Juninho then it's a payment therefore wages and therefore you broke the rules.
deary me
Keep fighting that fight Castle you might just convince someone,someday.
I'm not embarrassing. I understand the laws and the case here. Why is this investigation and facts on the Celtic case not been published?
If Rangers get off with the same in November will you want publication? It's not too much to ask.
All I want is transparency. The whole thing stinks to high heaven. What's wrong with wanting to see if everything was above board.
As I said this will go to court later if we lose it and we will win.
Tell me legally what I've posted as wrong Timinator?
Why would I want publication?
Will you want publication if Rangers win the case?
No, you would do what we have done,accept the commissions verdict
You have no proof in any shape or form Celtic have done wrong?
i'm not a lawyer castle,i just deal in facts.And the fact is celtic hav been cleared of any wrong doing
http://www.scotsman.com/the-scotsman/sport/football/celtic-cleared-by-spl-after-probe-into-use-of-ebt-1-2522219
sook it up and take whats coming
I want full publication of any findings into Rangers win or lose.
Nothing is coming courts will decide and we will win
"sook it up and take whats coming"
Quote of the day
Sign in if you want to comment
Spl's Iain Blair clears Celtic....
Page 2 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 13/9/12
Yeah course you would take that.
Rangers get investigated by a team of lawyers over months. Yet we are led to believe Celtic get investigated by one guy on his own over a few days.
Then he reports to the SPL commission which includes Celtic, but yeah it's all above board! FFS.
posted on 13/9/12
Aye we got fined hoops.
Timi...Case is closed,no more said on the matter
It's quite pathetic..they sound a bit bitter because they don't have that card to throw at us now
posted on 13/9/12
Let's face it the club who had their EBT managed by an ex deputy governor of the Bank of England were found to have operated the scheme correctly...whereas the club who had their EBT managed on the advice from a poornstar have a "case to answer to" and are under investigation.
What is so shocking about that?
Well, nothing really.
But if it suits you to believe it's all a conspiracy against Rangers, then so be it.
posted on 13/9/12
Henke..I reckon they are dreading October
posted on 13/9/12
Castle
Celtic used the EBT to pay for Juninho's severence pay AFTER his contract was over,what is so difficult for you to understand about that,that is why we were cleared because we did nothing wrong spit your dummy out all you like but thems the facts mister.
posted on 13/9/12
" U ain't goin nowhere bluenose ya cant"
Naw, I'm done.
posted on 13/9/12
I actually hope it's not above board and Celtic are guilty. Just to annoy the wee bares that little bit more.
Chuckle chuckle.
posted on 13/9/12
They wouldn't have paid an ebt after it was over that's why. It wouldn't be an EBT then.
posted on 13/9/12
it was an end of contract settlement
posted on 13/9/12
So you admit Celtic are innocent then Castle?
posted on 13/9/12
It wouldn't have been an EBT then. What part of that don't you get?
posted on 13/9/12
They wouldn't have paid an ebt after it was over that's why. It wouldn't be an EBT then.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not?
You gave Souness one ten years after he left, and obviously the SPL can't convict you for that.
But if Celtic did it...then it must be an evil agenda against Rangers.
posted on 13/9/12
Celtic listed an EBT in their accounts. This is why this severance is utter made up bullocks.
posted on 13/9/12
Yer a decent poster Castle..but seriously tonight you are embarassing
posted on 13/9/12
Souness wasn't playing for us henrik. An EBT is a tax free loan. If it was paid as severence to Juninho then it's a payment therefore wages and therefore you broke the rules.
posted on 13/9/12
deary me
Keep fighting that fight Castle you might just convince someone,someday.
posted on 13/9/12
I'm not embarrassing. I understand the laws and the case here. Why is this investigation and facts on the Celtic case not been published?
If Rangers get off with the same in November will you want publication? It's not too much to ask.
All I want is transparency. The whole thing stinks to high heaven. What's wrong with wanting to see if everything was above board.
As I said this will go to court later if we lose it and we will win.
posted on 13/9/12
Tell me legally what I've posted as wrong Timinator?
posted on 13/9/12
Tim,
im convinced.
posted on 13/9/12
Why would I want publication?
Will you want publication if Rangers win the case?
No, you would do what we have done,accept the commissions verdict
You have no proof in any shape or form Celtic have done wrong?
posted on 13/9/12
To you all
posted on 13/9/12
i'm not a lawyer castle,i just deal in facts.And the fact is celtic hav been cleared of any wrong doing
http://www.scotsman.com/the-scotsman/sport/football/celtic-cleared-by-spl-after-probe-into-use-of-ebt-1-2522219
sook it up and take whats coming
posted on 13/9/12
I want full publication of any findings into Rangers win or lose.
Nothing is coming courts will decide and we will win
posted on 13/9/12
"sook it up and take whats coming"
Quote of the day
posted on 13/9/12
"We will win"
Page 2 of 8
6 | 7 | 8