Comment deleted by Site Moderator
In this case Chang needs to go. Ridiculously unproffesional, especially for a man in his position.
The fact he's Director or Communications and PR just makes this laughable. What an absolute plank
Chang needs to resign or to be removed from his duties at the club.
PR is his job and he has brought nothing but bad PR through his own idiotic actions.
Chang out for me. What's he think we are, the mafia? Out.
Also this idiot making up things about the club, he isn't a Liverpool supporter. Stupid idiot, making the club look bad and costing the club money and time which should be spent elsewhere. Should be banned from the stadium and reported if he makes up any lies again in future.
jokes aside, I think this is actually a pretty disgraceful way to behave. Questioning whether Cummins had access to inside information is one thing, but employing mob-esque intimidation tactics is quite another, and entails a blatant and vile abuse of the power which his position at Liverpool FC grants him. Revoking season tickets should be reserved for criminals and hooligans. So much for cleaning up after the Suarez debacle.
TOOR I though the main problem this chang bloke had, was that this guy on the tinternet, was fairly accurate with his "lies".
costing liverpool money, well then nobody should ever talk about any possible transfer's until after they have happen, just incase it cost there club money
comment by Mr Reasonable (U2320)
posted 3 minutes ago
TOOR I though the main problem this chang bloke had, was that this guy on the tinternet, was fairly accurate with his "lies".
costing liverpool money, well then nobody should ever talk about any possible transfer's until after they have happen, just incase it cost there club money
--------------------------------------------
I think that's different than actually pretending to be somebody in the media and claiming to have inside knowledge, whilst building a persona and damaging the club. Fans talking about transfers is in no way the same thing.
didnt he say he was an aspiring reporter? and by how close he was with his "lies" then he does a better job than most. Plus in my opinion banning him is very unfair,
(the club made them selves look bad, for handling it the way they did, not some bloke on the tinternet)
I think Chang has to go after this. Who does he think we are, the Soprano's.
That said I think Cummins has to have a serious think about what he's publishing. It's all well and good being in the know. But he isn't thinking of the damage it's doing to an already tarnished reputation. Who's going to deal with us if its going to be reported on the Internet? Especially if the selling club want confidentiality.
comment by Mr Reasonable (U2320)
posted 7 minutes ago
didnt he say he was an aspiring reporter? and by how close he was with his "lies" then he does a better job than most. Plus in my opinion banning him is very unfair,
(the club made them selves look bad, for handling it the way they did, not some bloke on the tinternet)
------------------------------
Yeah he did say that and what a great way to get into it. Nobody will touch him now.
Also it wasn't the club, the club didn't know about the meeting. Chang went on his own accord which is why he has to go.
sorry but if someone who works for the club, does something wrong, it will always show the club in a bad light, ( the club hired this chang bloke) Also I think maybe the opposite may be true re: cummins? surely with how accurate he appeared he may get a job of one of the red tops soon
For me the most embarrassing think about the whole affair is that Cheng believed "Jenkins" was a serious reporter and had inside access to the club
Yes, as I said, that's why he has to go. Can't you read?
Cummins is undoubtedly the greatest internet wum that has ever lived.
TOOR, Yes, as I said, that's why he has to go. Can't you read?
can you?
Are the club not at all responsible?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Mr R
The club are responsible for disciplining/dismissing Chang as he has reflected badly on the club. They are not directly responsible for Chang's actions as he acted on his own. How can the club be responsible for something they didn't sanction and had no part in?
A cummins smiley
Surely this could also be used in conjunction with Ryan Giggs.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
the club are responsible for hiring this Chang bloke, anything he does rightfully or wrongfully reflect upon the club as a whole, ( I am not saying that liverpool as a club need action taking against them) but anything that one of there employees does is the reflects upon the club, there for they have a responseablity to hire better people
We have already said that's why he should be sacked. Are you capable of reading or just like repeating yourself?
Sign in if you want to comment
Batten down the hatches!
Page 1 of 2
posted on 30/10/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 30/10/12
In this case Chang needs to go. Ridiculously unproffesional, especially for a man in his position.
posted on 30/10/12
The fact he's Director or Communications and PR just makes this laughable. What an absolute plank
posted on 30/10/12
Chang needs to resign or to be removed from his duties at the club.
PR is his job and he has brought nothing but bad PR through his own idiotic actions.
posted on 30/10/12
Chang out for me. What's he think we are, the mafia? Out.
Also this idiot making up things about the club, he isn't a Liverpool supporter. Stupid idiot, making the club look bad and costing the club money and time which should be spent elsewhere. Should be banned from the stadium and reported if he makes up any lies again in future.
posted on 30/10/12
jokes aside, I think this is actually a pretty disgraceful way to behave. Questioning whether Cummins had access to inside information is one thing, but employing mob-esque intimidation tactics is quite another, and entails a blatant and vile abuse of the power which his position at Liverpool FC grants him. Revoking season tickets should be reserved for criminals and hooligans. So much for cleaning up after the Suarez debacle.
posted on 30/10/12
TOOR I though the main problem this chang bloke had, was that this guy on the tinternet, was fairly accurate with his "lies".
costing liverpool money, well then nobody should ever talk about any possible transfer's until after they have happen, just incase it cost there club money
posted on 30/10/12
comment by Mr Reasonable (U2320)
posted 3 minutes ago
TOOR I though the main problem this chang bloke had, was that this guy on the tinternet, was fairly accurate with his "lies".
costing liverpool money, well then nobody should ever talk about any possible transfer's until after they have happen, just incase it cost there club money
--------------------------------------------
I think that's different than actually pretending to be somebody in the media and claiming to have inside knowledge, whilst building a persona and damaging the club. Fans talking about transfers is in no way the same thing.
posted on 30/10/12
didnt he say he was an aspiring reporter? and by how close he was with his "lies" then he does a better job than most. Plus in my opinion banning him is very unfair,
(the club made them selves look bad, for handling it the way they did, not some bloke on the tinternet)
posted on 30/10/12
I think Chang has to go after this. Who does he think we are, the Soprano's.
That said I think Cummins has to have a serious think about what he's publishing. It's all well and good being in the know. But he isn't thinking of the damage it's doing to an already tarnished reputation. Who's going to deal with us if its going to be reported on the Internet? Especially if the selling club want confidentiality.
posted on 30/10/12
comment by Mr Reasonable (U2320)
posted 7 minutes ago
didnt he say he was an aspiring reporter? and by how close he was with his "lies" then he does a better job than most. Plus in my opinion banning him is very unfair,
(the club made them selves look bad, for handling it the way they did, not some bloke on the tinternet)
------------------------------
Yeah he did say that and what a great way to get into it. Nobody will touch him now.
posted on 30/10/12
Also it wasn't the club, the club didn't know about the meeting. Chang went on his own accord which is why he has to go.
posted on 30/10/12
sorry but if someone who works for the club, does something wrong, it will always show the club in a bad light, ( the club hired this chang bloke) Also I think maybe the opposite may be true re: cummins? surely with how accurate he appeared he may get a job of one of the red tops soon
posted on 30/10/12
For me the most embarrassing think about the whole affair is that Cheng believed "Jenkins" was a serious reporter and had inside access to the club
posted on 30/10/12
Yes, as I said, that's why he has to go. Can't you read?
posted on 30/10/12
Cummins is undoubtedly the greatest internet wum that has ever lived.
posted on 30/10/12
TOOR, Yes, as I said, that's why he has to go. Can't you read?
can you?
Are the club not at all responsible?
posted on 30/10/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 30/10/12
Mr R
The club are responsible for disciplining/dismissing Chang as he has reflected badly on the club. They are not directly responsible for Chang's actions as he acted on his own. How can the club be responsible for something they didn't sanction and had no part in?
posted on 30/10/12
A cummins smiley
Surely this could also be used in conjunction with Ryan Giggs.
posted on 30/10/12
posted on 30/10/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 30/10/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 30/10/12
the club are responsible for hiring this Chang bloke, anything he does rightfully or wrongfully reflect upon the club as a whole, ( I am not saying that liverpool as a club need action taking against them) but anything that one of there employees does is the reflects upon the club, there for they have a responseablity to hire better people
posted on 30/10/12
We have already said that's why he should be sacked. Are you capable of reading or just like repeating yourself?
Page 1 of 2