Nugent played deep to stop the guys who scored last time. All wingers are inconstant we could not afford a consisiant own worth their weight in gold!
I broadly agree...
Schmeichel - 8
Looked like a challenge to beat. True, some of his kicks went too far, but that kind of distance on a kick will give Watford something to think about in the return leg.
Schlupp - 5
Pretty good going forward, a couple of near-disasters in defence. Pace and strength keep him out of trouble mostly, but I reckon a fit Konchesky would get his place back at Vicarage Road.
Morgan - 8
Vydra wasn't the same after Morgan got him. Commanding performance.
Keane - 7
Justified his place in the squad with a whole-hearted and solid performance.
De Laet - 6
Largely snuffed out going forward - It appeared that Zola had identified him as a threat. Very solid in defence though.
Dyer - 7
It's warmed up, so he's back. Usual Dyer, used his pace to good effect but often lacked end product.
King - 9
Got everywhere and clearly really wanted it. He and James as a pair more than matched Watford's midfield three.
James - 9 (Man of the Match)
Complete midfield performance, worthy of the Premiership. Looks increasingly like a class player.
Knockaert - 7
Joker in the pack; gave the ball away but also a potential matchwinner. Dispels the myth that flair players can't also work hard. Excellent cross for the goal.
Nugent - 6
Showed a lot of poor touches and spurned a great opportunity in the first half. Grabbed the goal just before (probably) getting subbed and hopefully that will renew some confidence in him.
Wood - 4
Wasn't at the races, but this is explained by illness. Will probably play a lot better in the return leg if he's fit.
Kane - 7
Made a nuisance of himself when he came on, challenging to start the next match if Wood isn't 100%.
Drinkwater - n/a
With King and James playing as they did, he can't argue. Is an interesting option if we choose to go more defensive in the second leg. (Which we probably shouldn't.)
You're right I didn't mention the defensive benefit of Nugent playing in a deeper role. Thinking about it, against Watford this makes perfect sense given their use of the counter attack. In that sense it worked well, Watford did get in behind but that was because of errors not because their broke from midfield.
I noticed at very early stage that the wingers were tucking in and keeping the play compact when we pressing them high up the pitch, and almost man marking their wide men when the ball was turned over.
It has to be said that Pearson has been spot on tactically for the last couple of games. Shakespeare admitted to repeatedly telling Nigel to take Knockaert off in the Forest game, and look what happened!
The plan has been spot on, and the execution of it by the players has also improved as they become more confident.
All good signs that things could be coming together at just the right time
All get 8/10 But Schmeichel should not take 90% of our free kicks...
I'm not giving anybody in that team less than 6 after that performance. Wood tried hard and Shlupp was generally good in attack and defence, has pace helping (yes I know on another day Shlupp's mistakes could have cost us goals).
Not disagreeing much with the other scores. James definitely MoM.
For those calling for Konch's return, how fit is he after an operation to cope with Anya, who is a very tricky customer?
I haven't seen what Kane adds to the team as he's been generally poor to useless, but Thursday's cameo was easily the best he's played. Hopefully coming good at the right time.
It will be interesting to see what the tactics are for both sides tomorrow. I doubt if we'll get away with giving Udinese reserves the chances they had on Thursday as Deeney will presumably be back?
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Player Ratings Vs Watford
Page 1 of 1
posted on 10/5/13
Nugent played deep to stop the guys who scored last time. All wingers are inconstant we could not afford a consisiant own worth their weight in gold!
posted on 10/5/13
I broadly agree...
Schmeichel - 8
Looked like a challenge to beat. True, some of his kicks went too far, but that kind of distance on a kick will give Watford something to think about in the return leg.
Schlupp - 5
Pretty good going forward, a couple of near-disasters in defence. Pace and strength keep him out of trouble mostly, but I reckon a fit Konchesky would get his place back at Vicarage Road.
Morgan - 8
Vydra wasn't the same after Morgan got him. Commanding performance.
Keane - 7
Justified his place in the squad with a whole-hearted and solid performance.
De Laet - 6
Largely snuffed out going forward - It appeared that Zola had identified him as a threat. Very solid in defence though.
Dyer - 7
It's warmed up, so he's back. Usual Dyer, used his pace to good effect but often lacked end product.
King - 9
Got everywhere and clearly really wanted it. He and James as a pair more than matched Watford's midfield three.
James - 9 (Man of the Match)
Complete midfield performance, worthy of the Premiership. Looks increasingly like a class player.
Knockaert - 7
Joker in the pack; gave the ball away but also a potential matchwinner. Dispels the myth that flair players can't also work hard. Excellent cross for the goal.
Nugent - 6
Showed a lot of poor touches and spurned a great opportunity in the first half. Grabbed the goal just before (probably) getting subbed and hopefully that will renew some confidence in him.
Wood - 4
Wasn't at the races, but this is explained by illness. Will probably play a lot better in the return leg if he's fit.
Kane - 7
Made a nuisance of himself when he came on, challenging to start the next match if Wood isn't 100%.
Drinkwater - n/a
With King and James playing as they did, he can't argue. Is an interesting option if we choose to go more defensive in the second leg. (Which we probably shouldn't.)
posted on 10/5/13
You're right I didn't mention the defensive benefit of Nugent playing in a deeper role. Thinking about it, against Watford this makes perfect sense given their use of the counter attack. In that sense it worked well, Watford did get in behind but that was because of errors not because their broke from midfield.
I noticed at very early stage that the wingers were tucking in and keeping the play compact when we pressing them high up the pitch, and almost man marking their wide men when the ball was turned over.
It has to be said that Pearson has been spot on tactically for the last couple of games. Shakespeare admitted to repeatedly telling Nigel to take Knockaert off in the Forest game, and look what happened!
The plan has been spot on, and the execution of it by the players has also improved as they become more confident.
All good signs that things could be coming together at just the right time
posted on 10/5/13
All get 8/10 But Schmeichel should not take 90% of our free kicks...
posted on 11/5/13
I'm not giving anybody in that team less than 6 after that performance. Wood tried hard and Shlupp was generally good in attack and defence, has pace helping (yes I know on another day Shlupp's mistakes could have cost us goals).
Not disagreeing much with the other scores. James definitely MoM.
For those calling for Konch's return, how fit is he after an operation to cope with Anya, who is a very tricky customer?
I haven't seen what Kane adds to the team as he's been generally poor to useless, but Thursday's cameo was easily the best he's played. Hopefully coming good at the right time.
It will be interesting to see what the tactics are for both sides tomorrow. I doubt if we'll get away with giving Udinese reserves the chances they had on Thursday as Deeney will presumably be back?
Page 1 of 1