Forget 4th rate, we are down to 5th rate.

Also, look at top teams, they are all score 370- 400 vs associates, we crawled to 340 and that with a few drops from UAE. We are behind the times and playing catch up... Don't let the last couple of victories fool you

Both Shehzad and Haris coasted too much. They got to there 50 of 70 balls and then didn't accelerate which is what Amla, Gayle and Warner do. They were basically playing for there 3 figures.

Great win for Excuseistan last night

Vinz is heading for the top of the Fantasy Cricket game He has Warner as PP, I had Finch

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

DJ, can you change the PP for the 2nd game even if the 1st game is still on going?

Yes mate. There is a 'schedule subs' option so you can do subs for the second game before the first starts, and when the first ball is bowled in a game the change team option is re-opened for future games.

So if you go on now and change your team it is for the next game, plus there will also be the option to schedule subs for the game after the next one.

So any changes now will be in time for Banga v Scots, plus you can schedule subs for India v Windies,must below your team.

I only realised the scheduled subs option after the first phase of the fantasy cricket. Would have been wiping the floor with you otherwise Dan

Reading rules>>>>> Cricket knowledge

#stage1champion

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Yes well, they are clearly stupid rules. Also the amount of changes you can make is frankly ridiculous. I never play cricinfo fantasy anymore because you need to change it at least once a day which is crazy. It should be much more like fantasy.premierleague .

Duncan, we're using the ICC fantasy league, not cricinfo. To be honest, since their update, I barely use cricinfo now

Well, all these fantasy cricket games are ludicrous and let you make far too many changes.

Re the cricket, not sure about Marsh really, pretty average IMHO, I'd rather have Watson.

This world cup has been pretty dire so far. Far too many one sided games with the exception of the odd associate v associate game.

24.2
Maxwell to Mohammad Nabi, OUT, Nabi has reviewed this. Nabi looks to paddle, Clarke is running back towards short fine, then he realises Nabi has got a soft edge, and he runs back in towards the stumps to catch this. Nabi says this has come off the arm. He is right, it has come off the arm, but after hitting the top edge. And oh by the way, the snicko has not registered anything even though there is a clear edge here


To all you pakistan fans crying about the Umar Akmal decision.

hhaha Vinz i was thinking the same thing

There is actually a huge difference between the two decisions. Nabi the onfield umpire gave out while Akmal the onfield umpire did not give out. There was no clear evidence to reverse the Akmal decision so go back the drawing board

The umpire obviously made a mistake with the Akmal decision.

Pathetic performance from Afghanistan

Bit harsh Neo

What were you expecting Neo lol?

don't know! better than that at least