Lol how on earth would it cause stress and anxiety

Yeah, that's what the rest of international cricket is still trying to work out mate

The problem with having no referral system.. is when umpires realize they have made an error. they try and rectify it by giving the aggrieved party a bad call in return.And then it becomes a viscious round about.
At lords England will get all the 50/50s in our favour. some less than 50%.
I think most would just want the right calls for the entire match and DRS gets nigh on everything correct.

There is a mistake there...Waiting for the reason you don't include that. 2 2 in mistakes

There is a mistake there...Waiting for the reason you don't include that. 2 2 in mistakes

no India aksed for caught behind.. no one even thought that was lbw..
so still 3-1..

Had it gone to DRS then it would have still been given out under referral.

That makes it

England 3 - 2 India

India would have run outta appeals anyway 3-1

It's 3-1 in Indias favour

this is such a stupidly biased thread. I just dont see the point. Its 2-2 or 3-2 if you want Robsons.

Where's Indias second come from?

Anderson's lbw

comment by englandwhoelse (U16825)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
India would have run outta appeals anyway 3-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
oAnd you honestly think this is a fair thread?

Comment deleted by Article Creator

Thanks for you imput.. But it was put through my selection panel and was found to be breaking the house rules..

Come on please get that arrogant Kohli out for a low score.

England,

If you are going to write an article regarding umpiring errors then be at-least fair and mature..

You blindly avoid facts n few folks here who always like to bash India join here. At the end of the day we all are cricket fans and we should try to behave with respect to each other. Again I told you as little banter/fun is fine but plz don't cross the line. Also y did u delete Duncan's comment? If ur so thin skinned then y bother writing an article?

The icc should make drs mandatory. If you don't like it then you should be banned from playing test cricket simple as. I am surprised sky have not had more to say on this matter considering the amount of money they are pumping into cricket.

@Benny,

I replied earlier to ur similar comment in other thread.. Again I will repeat that most of Indian fans prefer DRS. It is BCCI n idiot Dhoni against it. U should use ur energy complaining to ECB. Y they cave it so easily? They ain't weak like BCB or PCB.

Also luckily we don't live in a dictatorship type of country. Ur suggestion to debar a Nation doesn't make sense if they may not agree with ur view!

I agree that drs should be mandatory, can't have certain teams playing what is in some ways a different sport.

Regarding this match, Englandwhoelse is being biased, if they had reviewed, they would not have lost them and would have still been able to review the decisions that were in question.

Fact is that DRS is making slightly bad decisions look awful. Who would have seen Shami's edge or the inside edge that Robson made, the commentators didn't even agree with replays.

How the hell am I being biased? its 3-1 so far in this series..

It is not 3-1. 3-2 at the very least.

It is 3-3 at the very least..

Its 3 2 against India, or 3 3!