comment by The DC (U19776)
posted 5 seconds ago
Rangers have expressed "deep disappointment at this decision and are now considering all options"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
King or kennedy or both
comment by Toiler (U15853)
posted 3 seconds ago
Laudrup is beeling big style
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm no in raging
The board have got rid of anycant in favour of either of those two laudrup...
comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The DC (U19776)
posted 40 seconds ago
Oh I think it does timmy...why else would lawwell be shoehorned into a commitee which has a direct say over which spiv runs us....never mind a multi billionaire spiv
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would it?
Mike ashley is just like all the others. He is only interested in the fans money and plans to milk you like all the others. Rangers will never get back to the way you were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you know him quite well timmy? Or are you making that up too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he didn't pump millions into newcastle why would he put money into a bottomless pit like rangers?
The fact he is fleecing you with his merchandise deal tells you all you need to know about him.
As I've said before these suits have constantly treated the fans like $hit
A statement released today on the SFA's official website read:
"The Scottish FA Board convened on Tuesday, 23rd December to hear a submission from the Board of Rangers Football Club. This meeting was arranged in respect of a request set out in an Application to Consent to an increase in MASH Holdings Limited's shareholding in Rangers International Football Club to a maximum of 29.9% of the issued share capital.
"The Board has now carefully considered the Application and has decided, unanimously, that the Application should not be granted.
"The Board, under Article 13 of the Scottish FA Articles of Association, is required to have due regard to the need to promote and safeguard the interests and public profile of association football, its players, spectators and others involved with the game. This test is set out in full in Article 13.6.
Ah well that will be that.
Was a good run but it had to come to an end I suppose.
Best just call in the liquidators now and that way the process can be done quickly and everyone can find something else to do.
comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 49 seconds ago
A statement released today on the SFA's official website read:
"The Scottish FA Board convened on Tuesday, 23rd December to hear a submission from the Board of Rangers Football Club. This meeting was arranged in respect of a request set out in an Application to Consent to an increase in MASH Holdings Limited's shareholding in Rangers International Football Club to a maximum of 29.9% of the issued share capital.
"The Board has now carefully considered the Application and has decided, unanimously, that the Application should not be granted.
"The Board, under Article 13 of the Scottish FA Articles of Association, is required to have due regard to the need to promote and safeguard the interests and public profile of association football, its players, spectators and others involved with the game. This test is set out in full in Article 13.6.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They have done you a favour with that decision. What would have happened if you both qualified for europe.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Dunno timmy what happened to chelsea and cska moscow?
comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 49 seconds ago
A statement released today on the SFA's official website read:
"The Scottish FA Board convened on Tuesday, 23rd December to hear a submission from the Board of Rangers Football Club. This meeting was arranged in respect of a request set out in an Application to Consent to an increase in MASH Holdings Limited's shareholding in Rangers International Football Club to a maximum of 29.9% of the issued share capital.
"The Board has now carefully considered the Application and has decided, unanimously, that the Application should not be granted.
"The Board, under Article 13 of the Scottish FA Articles of Association, is required to have due regard to the need to promote and safeguard the interests and public profile of association football, its players, spectators and others involved with the game. This test is set out in full in Article 13.6.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They have done you a favour with that decision. What would have happened if you both qualified for europe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps they have
What would have happened if you both qualified for europe.
Do you mean like hearts and Kaunus?
Newcastle would have took your place which could have meant your place being handed to Celtic. I would love to have seen the beel from the rangers if that had happened.
Great result ! There are still options on the table , Ashley has shown his hand so difficult to see how he can shove up another patsy. Time will tell but it'll need to be quick !
Great result and about time the SFA did what wa sin our interest.
We have other parties with money who want to invest who have been blocked. FFS even the papers today showed this by SOS posts.
Get Ashley to fluck
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Why are you lumping all the fans together Pointy when a lots of us have said we wanted this? Also loads of groups online who want this.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Caught the headlines, what I do wonder is is Mike Ashley had set up a super secret "holdings" company what would the SFA been able to do? The less opaque you are the harder it is, buy the looks of things. Could "I'm not mike Ashley holdings" not have bought 30%?
I watched a documentary on the Championship clubs and half of them folk don't even have clue who owns them.
I would argue a decision like the one today technically mandates that "holding oragansiations" should reveal major shareholders publicly.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I'm not blaming the SFA in this at all, Ashley knew this was coming, he needs to stand aside now, what happens to Lambias now he is the CEO
comment by PointyBirds (U8853)
posted 13 minutes ago
SFA let shysters into you club = It's their responsibility/fault.
SFA start taking an interest = kafflick cabal.
You are some odd fellows.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a bad day when pointy calls you and odd fellow, I'm no having that
Can you still get oddfellows
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 8 minutes ago
Caught the headlines, what I do wonder is is Mike Ashley had set up a super secret "holdings" company what would the SFA been able to do? The less opaque you are the harder it is, buy the looks of things. Could "I'm not mike Ashley holdings" not have bought 30%?
I watched a documentary on the Championship clubs and half of them folk don't even have clue who owns them.
I would argue a decision like the one today technically mandates that "holding oragansiations" should reveal major shareholders publicly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't think the disaplinary procedure would have held much water on Ashley being called up for having more control than he should have ,he is a small shareholder after all, but this is different he wanted to own more of the company and they said you can't
Ashley signed a contract saying he wouldn't have any more than 10%. He also signed up to not having any influence of the club.
EU courts wont get involved.
The sooner fans learn to stop paying money and going to games the better. We have investment from King still sitting on the table. Not to mention from Paul Murray and others.
They are making fans afraid of what will happen. Some of our fans need to wake the fluck up and stop being afraid whilst these rats are bleeding the club with some fan consent. They will leave when no money is to be made.
Sign in if you want to comment
Ashley gets an SFA knock back
Page 2 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 24/12/14
comment by The DC (U19776)
posted 5 seconds ago
Rangers have expressed "deep disappointment at this decision and are now considering all options"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
King or kennedy or both
posted on 24/12/14
comment by Toiler (U15853)
posted 3 seconds ago
Laudrup is beeling big style
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm no in raging
posted on 24/12/14
The board have got rid of anycant in favour of either of those two laudrup...
posted on 24/12/14
comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The DC (U19776)
posted 40 seconds ago
Oh I think it does timmy...why else would lawwell be shoehorned into a commitee which has a direct say over which spiv runs us....never mind a multi billionaire spiv
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would it?
Mike ashley is just like all the others. He is only interested in the fans money and plans to milk you like all the others. Rangers will never get back to the way you were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you know him quite well timmy? Or are you making that up too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he didn't pump millions into newcastle why would he put money into a bottomless pit like rangers?
The fact he is fleecing you with his merchandise deal tells you all you need to know about him.
posted on 24/12/14
As I've said before these suits have constantly treated the fans like $hit
posted on 24/12/14
A statement released today on the SFA's official website read:
"The Scottish FA Board convened on Tuesday, 23rd December to hear a submission from the Board of Rangers Football Club. This meeting was arranged in respect of a request set out in an Application to Consent to an increase in MASH Holdings Limited's shareholding in Rangers International Football Club to a maximum of 29.9% of the issued share capital.
"The Board has now carefully considered the Application and has decided, unanimously, that the Application should not be granted.
"The Board, under Article 13 of the Scottish FA Articles of Association, is required to have due regard to the need to promote and safeguard the interests and public profile of association football, its players, spectators and others involved with the game. This test is set out in full in Article 13.6.
posted on 24/12/14
Ah well that will be that.
Was a good run but it had to come to an end I suppose.
Best just call in the liquidators now and that way the process can be done quickly and everyone can find something else to do.
posted on 24/12/14
comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 49 seconds ago
A statement released today on the SFA's official website read:
"The Scottish FA Board convened on Tuesday, 23rd December to hear a submission from the Board of Rangers Football Club. This meeting was arranged in respect of a request set out in an Application to Consent to an increase in MASH Holdings Limited's shareholding in Rangers International Football Club to a maximum of 29.9% of the issued share capital.
"The Board has now carefully considered the Application and has decided, unanimously, that the Application should not be granted.
"The Board, under Article 13 of the Scottish FA Articles of Association, is required to have due regard to the need to promote and safeguard the interests and public profile of association football, its players, spectators and others involved with the game. This test is set out in full in Article 13.6.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They have done you a favour with that decision. What would have happened if you both qualified for europe.
posted on 24/12/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/12/14
Dunno timmy what happened to chelsea and cska moscow?
posted on 24/12/14
comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 49 seconds ago
A statement released today on the SFA's official website read:
"The Scottish FA Board convened on Tuesday, 23rd December to hear a submission from the Board of Rangers Football Club. This meeting was arranged in respect of a request set out in an Application to Consent to an increase in MASH Holdings Limited's shareholding in Rangers International Football Club to a maximum of 29.9% of the issued share capital.
"The Board has now carefully considered the Application and has decided, unanimously, that the Application should not be granted.
"The Board, under Article 13 of the Scottish FA Articles of Association, is required to have due regard to the need to promote and safeguard the interests and public profile of association football, its players, spectators and others involved with the game. This test is set out in full in Article 13.6.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They have done you a favour with that decision. What would have happened if you both qualified for europe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps they have
posted on 24/12/14
What would have happened if you both qualified for europe.
Do you mean like hearts and Kaunus?
posted on 24/12/14
Newcastle would have took your place which could have meant your place being handed to Celtic. I would love to have seen the beel from the rangers if that had happened.
posted on 24/12/14
Great result ! There are still options on the table , Ashley has shown his hand so difficult to see how he can shove up another patsy. Time will tell but it'll need to be quick !
posted on 24/12/14
Great result and about time the SFA did what wa sin our interest.
We have other parties with money who want to invest who have been blocked. FFS even the papers today showed this by SOS posts.
Get Ashley to fluck
posted on 24/12/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/12/14
Why are you lumping all the fans together Pointy when a lots of us have said we wanted this? Also loads of groups online who want this.
posted on 24/12/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/12/14
Caught the headlines, what I do wonder is is Mike Ashley had set up a super secret "holdings" company what would the SFA been able to do? The less opaque you are the harder it is, buy the looks of things. Could "I'm not mike Ashley holdings" not have bought 30%?
I watched a documentary on the Championship clubs and half of them folk don't even have clue who owns them.
I would argue a decision like the one today technically mandates that "holding oragansiations" should reveal major shareholders publicly.
posted on 24/12/14
Fair enough Pointy.
posted on 24/12/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/12/14
I'm not blaming the SFA in this at all, Ashley knew this was coming, he needs to stand aside now, what happens to Lambias now he is the CEO
posted on 24/12/14
comment by PointyBirds (U8853)
posted 13 minutes ago
SFA let shysters into you club = It's their responsibility/fault.
SFA start taking an interest = kafflick cabal.
You are some odd fellows.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a bad day when pointy calls you and odd fellow, I'm no having that
Can you still get oddfellows
posted on 24/12/14
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 8 minutes ago
Caught the headlines, what I do wonder is is Mike Ashley had set up a super secret "holdings" company what would the SFA been able to do? The less opaque you are the harder it is, buy the looks of things. Could "I'm not mike Ashley holdings" not have bought 30%?
I watched a documentary on the Championship clubs and half of them folk don't even have clue who owns them.
I would argue a decision like the one today technically mandates that "holding oragansiations" should reveal major shareholders publicly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't think the disaplinary procedure would have held much water on Ashley being called up for having more control than he should have ,he is a small shareholder after all, but this is different he wanted to own more of the company and they said you can't
posted on 24/12/14
Ashley signed a contract saying he wouldn't have any more than 10%. He also signed up to not having any influence of the club.
EU courts wont get involved.
The sooner fans learn to stop paying money and going to games the better. We have investment from King still sitting on the table. Not to mention from Paul Murray and others.
They are making fans afraid of what will happen. Some of our fans need to wake the fluck up and stop being afraid whilst these rats are bleeding the club with some fan consent. They will leave when no money is to be made.
Page 2 of 7
6 | 7