Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

THE ACE,

Peace fella.....

Firstly, what is all this “I've really had enough of this nonsense” and “seriously wish I'd never fúcking bothered now” all about ? All I’ve done is documented a response in a clear, decent and reasonable way, with the intent of having a debate on the forum. In my view, I would much rather this on-topic type response than a “you’re a delusional this”, “you’re a delusional that” one.

Seriously, what is it with posters on here taking offence when you oppose an opinion on a neutrally created article? As I reminded you before, I didn’t create this article – I just chose to have an opinion on it. And I felt it was better to post it in an easy to read format than in a one-paragraph rant with no full stops or punctuation.

You claim you don’t feel it is necessary to keep raking over it, and if this is the case, why did you post on it at all? That is a fair comment. And just because you may not want to rake over it, other posters may well do. So without sounding patronising, maybe just skip any future articles involving ex-personnel – that way you won’t have to see opinions on this type of subject.

For example, if you don’t want to debate about Siggy and whether or not he has created an assist or scored a goal (as you mentioned), then you don’t have to. I too wouldn’t have any interest in that debate – and so I wouldn’t get involved in that type of article – but I have absolutely no problem if others on here should wish to do so.

I just don’t understand (whether light hearted or not) you would aim your frustration at the poster(s) who respond to an article like this – rather than the poster who created the article in the first place. It may not be the case, but it just comes across like you want to control what posters want to talk about. If it’s not your thing – leave it.

So, you may think Fazio and Dier “may come good” - that is a fair comment. Personally I think Fazio is the biggest donkey I’ve seen at WHL since Mabizela, and I think Poch was totally wrong to sell a proven player, captain and leader for him. I don’t see what is so wrong with this opinion and why I should not be able to write it on the forum – especially on an article such as this (again note, not created by me).

Now, please just take this post for what it is – which is simply a standard on topic forum-response to a posting – nothing more – nothing less. Clean slate... If you don’t wish to respond any more then that is also fine.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

consistent chicken

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

How fücking sad

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

a rock?

Shale rock maybe, one that crumbles very easily

He isn't a granite type rock, like Fazio

Come on Chicken, fair enough if you rate him, but he's not a 'rock'.

===============

I certainly rate him better than any of our current CBs. And we have certainly missed his leadership.

A bad bit of business that.

He's getting absolutely skinned by pace again tonight

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Yep, not his best game yesterday. I think the 6/10 rating in the paper was fair...

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I'm surprised there's no comments on this one today .

I didnt get to see the game Saturday but i hear he was pretty poor. The morning paper gave him 5/10.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Newcastle really deserve to be relegated but somehow I think Hull are gone