Yeah I think Andrade is the goods. I'd pick him to beat Canelo.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Porter would maul Khan. He's not the biggest puncher but he's physically very strong and relentless. Brook managed to beat him but he must have clinched about 500 times per round. I'm not sure Khan is strong enough to clinch Porter effectively without getting hit, Brook is huge welterweight and he only just managed to do it effectively. Porter has speed too, he's a good boxer as well although he didn't show it against Brook, he was too wild.
There's absolutely no way Khan stops him, Porter is very tough and has a solid chin. If Khan wins it would be the slightest of margins by UD
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
lol styles make fights etc. Khan vs Alexander was a boxing match so of course Khan is going to have an easier time than Porter. Porter beat him easily anyway.
Julio Diaz is another common opponent they have. Diaz fought Porter twice, got a draw the first time although I felt he lost. He didn't train with his father for the first time though and won the rematch clearly. Diaz gave Khan a very tough fight as well and dropped him.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Porter isn't tailor made for Khan. He's a relentless pressure fighter and we've seen Khan fold under pressure before. And like I said he might not be strong enough to clinch a tank like Porter. There's absolutely no way Khan can 'bully' Porter lol, he couldn't even handle Peterson on the inside.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by The Guvnor III V.I.K-Give me a scotch.I'm... (U12889)
posted 10 minutes ago
At 147lbs khan is a whole different animal. I can't see any fighter outside pacquiao and floyd beating khan in a decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guv so you think Khan beats Thurman ?
Superb pretending he knows who Thurman is.
Thurman is one of my favourite boxers but it's quite simple why he hasnt gotten himself in the Mayweather sweepstakes. He hasnt fought a marquee name yet and got himself in the public domain. Guerrero is a step in the right direction. Tought fight for him but I think Thurman wins a 9-3 or 8-4 decision. Possible late stoppage if Guerrero is reckless like he was in his last fight.
I believe Floyd fights Pacquiao and Cotto this year. If he continues boxing it will be for one fight only so Thurman might get a shot next year.
Also Mayweather will only fight above 147 if your a huge PPV name. Like he has done for De La Hoya, Cotto and Canelo. Not for muppets like Lara who stink the joint out.
Superb pretending he knows who Thurman is.
-------------------------
Oh dear muggins is back.
Yes I know who Thurman is which is why I brought him up as someone who gets mentioned little on this board.
Admittedly he hasn't fought a really big name yet and he's not a huge draw just yet but he will be and I think he's more than ready to take on the likes of Bradley.
As for Khan I think that Thurman wipes the floor with him.
I'd pay to see Golovkin pulverised Mayweather.
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 6 minutes ago
Superb pretending he knows who Thurman is.
-------------------------
Oh dear muggins is back.
Says the psycho who has no life but to type the same Mayweather drivel everyday. We got a name for people like you. Its called a pactard and they belong on the pacland forum. And dont lie you never heard of Thurman until recently
comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 6 minutes ago
I'd pay to see Golovkin pulverise Mayweather.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We'd all love to see that fight.
Well everyone apart from the Flomos like Larry Holmes Jab who are desperate to see Floyd retire undefeated.
Golovkin would destroy Floyd, even if he had to come down to 147.
We'll never see that fight in a million years though.
top 10 heavyweights 1. Wladimir Klitschko 2. Deontay Wilder 3. Tyson Fury 4. Pulev 5. Povetkin 6. Stiverne 7. Jennings 8. Joshua 9. Ruiz 10. Perez
Cruiserweights 1. Hernandez 2. Huck 3. Drozd 4. Lebedev 5. Mchunu 6. Afolabi 7. Wlodarczyk 8. Makubu 9. Chakhkiev 10. Usyk
LH 1. Kovalev 2. Stevenson 3. Hopkins 4. Pascal 5. Beterbiev 6. Alvarez 7. Braehmer 8. Chilemba 9. Fonfara 10. Mohammedi
SM 1. Ward 2. Froch 3. Anthony Dirrell 4. Groves 5. Degale 6. Andre Dirrell 7. Abraham 8. Stieglitz 9. Ramirez 10. Calum Smith
Golovkin weighed 163 yesterday at the 7 day weigh in before the Murray fight. Some welterweights weigh higher than that on fight night.
I think he can make 154 barely healthy for a big fight, but I wouldn't want him going down there for anyone other than Floyd.
Canelo is moving up to 160 soon I think, he's been struggling to make 154 for a while. I'd love to see that fight happen and I think it will
We got a name for people like you. Its called a pactard and they belong on the pacland forum. And dont lie you never heard of Thurman until recently
-------------------------------
If I'm such a Pactard then why have I stated on several occasions that Floyd probably beats Pacquiao ??
Surely I would be saying that Pacquiao wins if I was the "Pactard" you so desperately want me to be.
As for Thurman I've known about him for a while, sorry if that irks you for whatever strange reason.
I brought his name up because we were talking about welterweights who probably don't get as much media attention as they deserve and Thurman definitely fits into that category.
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 6 minutes ago
I'd pay to see Golovkin pulverise Mayweather.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We'd all love to see that fight.
Well everyone apart from the Flomos like Larry Holmes Jab who are desperate to see Floyd retire undefeated.
Golovkin would destroy Floyd, even if he had to come down to 147.
We'll never see that fight in a million years though.
Only deluded pactards who hate Mayweather would want to see it. I dont see neutrals or the media calling for the fight and rightly so. Golovkin is a middleweight why not just ask for Mayweather vs Klitschko now sling your facking hook from the boxing board.
Pacquiao needed a catchweight against a bum like Margarito. I dont see this clown superb calling for Golovkin vs Pacquiao.
Golovkin would destroy Floyd, even if he had to come down to 147.
So why dont Golovkin come down and challenge him at 147 you mug
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 48 seconds ago
We got a name for people like you. Its called a pactard and they belong on the pacland forum. And dont lie you never heard of Thurman until recently
-------------------------------
If I'm such a Pactard then why have I stated on several occasions that Floyd probably beats Pacquiao ??
Because you post absolute bile about Mayweather. Your a pactard end off. You got nothing to back your BS about Floyd on. You post lie after lie now fack off to pacland.
You never seen Thurman fight.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
http://forum.philboxing.com/ There you go. You will fit right in with your bf D4.
Nah 140
Hopefully it's for the vacant WBO title that got stripped off Algieri (disgracefully). Rumour has it Crawford will be fighting for it on April 18th
comment by Larry Holmes Jab (U20302)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 48 seconds ago
We got a name for people like you. Its called a pactard and they belong on the pacland forum. And dont lie you never heard of Thurman until recently
-------------------------------
If I'm such a Pactard then why have I stated on several occasions that Floyd probably beats Pacquiao ??
Because you post absolute bile about Mayweather. Your a pactard end off. You got nothing to back your BS about Floyd on. You post lie after lie now fack off to pacland.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ironic that someone that talks as much biased nonsense as you can accuse someone else of talking bile.
As for the Mayweather Pacquiao fight I'm desperate to see that fight happen and have been for 6 years.
I think it's farcical that we've had to wait this long for the fight. Even if they do make this fight happen now it's not as if we're seeing them fight at the peak of their powers and I find that really frustrating.
Sign in if you want to comment
The Guvnors Boxing Weight class Rankings
Page 2 of 3
posted on 15/2/15
Yeah I think Andrade is the goods. I'd pick him to beat Canelo.
posted on 15/2/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/2/15
Porter would maul Khan. He's not the biggest puncher but he's physically very strong and relentless. Brook managed to beat him but he must have clinched about 500 times per round. I'm not sure Khan is strong enough to clinch Porter effectively without getting hit, Brook is huge welterweight and he only just managed to do it effectively. Porter has speed too, he's a good boxer as well although he didn't show it against Brook, he was too wild.
There's absolutely no way Khan stops him, Porter is very tough and has a solid chin. If Khan wins it would be the slightest of margins by UD
posted on 15/2/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/2/15
lol styles make fights etc. Khan vs Alexander was a boxing match so of course Khan is going to have an easier time than Porter. Porter beat him easily anyway.
Julio Diaz is another common opponent they have. Diaz fought Porter twice, got a draw the first time although I felt he lost. He didn't train with his father for the first time though and won the rematch clearly. Diaz gave Khan a very tough fight as well and dropped him.
posted on 15/2/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/2/15
Porter isn't tailor made for Khan. He's a relentless pressure fighter and we've seen Khan fold under pressure before. And like I said he might not be strong enough to clinch a tank like Porter. There's absolutely no way Khan can 'bully' Porter lol, he couldn't even handle Peterson on the inside.
posted on 15/2/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/2/15
comment by The Guvnor III V.I.K-Give me a scotch.I'm... (U12889)
posted 10 minutes ago
At 147lbs khan is a whole different animal. I can't see any fighter outside pacquiao and floyd beating khan in a decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guv so you think Khan beats Thurman ?
posted on 15/2/15
Superb pretending he knows who Thurman is.
Thurman is one of my favourite boxers but it's quite simple why he hasnt gotten himself in the Mayweather sweepstakes. He hasnt fought a marquee name yet and got himself in the public domain. Guerrero is a step in the right direction. Tought fight for him but I think Thurman wins a 9-3 or 8-4 decision. Possible late stoppage if Guerrero is reckless like he was in his last fight.
I believe Floyd fights Pacquiao and Cotto this year. If he continues boxing it will be for one fight only so Thurman might get a shot next year.
Also Mayweather will only fight above 147 if your a huge PPV name. Like he has done for De La Hoya, Cotto and Canelo. Not for muppets like Lara who stink the joint out.
posted on 15/2/15
Superb pretending he knows who Thurman is.
-------------------------
Oh dear muggins is back.
Yes I know who Thurman is which is why I brought him up as someone who gets mentioned little on this board.
Admittedly he hasn't fought a really big name yet and he's not a huge draw just yet but he will be and I think he's more than ready to take on the likes of Bradley.
As for Khan I think that Thurman wipes the floor with him.
posted on 15/2/15
I'd pay to see Golovkin pulverised Mayweather.
posted on 15/2/15
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 6 minutes ago
Superb pretending he knows who Thurman is.
-------------------------
Oh dear muggins is back.
Says the psycho who has no life but to type the same Mayweather drivel everyday. We got a name for people like you. Its called a pactard and they belong on the pacland forum. And dont lie you never heard of Thurman until recently
posted on 15/2/15
comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 6 minutes ago
I'd pay to see Golovkin pulverise Mayweather.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We'd all love to see that fight.
Well everyone apart from the Flomos like Larry Holmes Jab who are desperate to see Floyd retire undefeated.
Golovkin would destroy Floyd, even if he had to come down to 147.
We'll never see that fight in a million years though.
posted on 15/2/15
top 10 heavyweights 1. Wladimir Klitschko 2. Deontay Wilder 3. Tyson Fury 4. Pulev 5. Povetkin 6. Stiverne 7. Jennings 8. Joshua 9. Ruiz 10. Perez
Cruiserweights 1. Hernandez 2. Huck 3. Drozd 4. Lebedev 5. Mchunu 6. Afolabi 7. Wlodarczyk 8. Makubu 9. Chakhkiev 10. Usyk
LH 1. Kovalev 2. Stevenson 3. Hopkins 4. Pascal 5. Beterbiev 6. Alvarez 7. Braehmer 8. Chilemba 9. Fonfara 10. Mohammedi
SM 1. Ward 2. Froch 3. Anthony Dirrell 4. Groves 5. Degale 6. Andre Dirrell 7. Abraham 8. Stieglitz 9. Ramirez 10. Calum Smith
posted on 15/2/15
Golovkin weighed 163 yesterday at the 7 day weigh in before the Murray fight. Some welterweights weigh higher than that on fight night.
I think he can make 154 barely healthy for a big fight, but I wouldn't want him going down there for anyone other than Floyd.
Canelo is moving up to 160 soon I think, he's been struggling to make 154 for a while. I'd love to see that fight happen and I think it will
posted on 15/2/15
We got a name for people like you. Its called a pactard and they belong on the pacland forum. And dont lie you never heard of Thurman until recently
-------------------------------
If I'm such a Pactard then why have I stated on several occasions that Floyd probably beats Pacquiao ??
Surely I would be saying that Pacquiao wins if I was the "Pactard" you so desperately want me to be.
As for Thurman I've known about him for a while, sorry if that irks you for whatever strange reason.
I brought his name up because we were talking about welterweights who probably don't get as much media attention as they deserve and Thurman definitely fits into that category.
posted on 15/2/15
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 6 minutes ago
I'd pay to see Golovkin pulverise Mayweather.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We'd all love to see that fight.
Well everyone apart from the Flomos like Larry Holmes Jab who are desperate to see Floyd retire undefeated.
Golovkin would destroy Floyd, even if he had to come down to 147.
We'll never see that fight in a million years though.
Only deluded pactards who hate Mayweather would want to see it. I dont see neutrals or the media calling for the fight and rightly so. Golovkin is a middleweight why not just ask for Mayweather vs Klitschko now sling your facking hook from the boxing board.
Pacquiao needed a catchweight against a bum like Margarito. I dont see this clown superb calling for Golovkin vs Pacquiao.
Golovkin would destroy Floyd, even if he had to come down to 147.
So why dont Golovkin come down and challenge him at 147 you mug
posted on 15/2/15
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 48 seconds ago
We got a name for people like you. Its called a pactard and they belong on the pacland forum. And dont lie you never heard of Thurman until recently
-------------------------------
If I'm such a Pactard then why have I stated on several occasions that Floyd probably beats Pacquiao ??
Because you post absolute bile about Mayweather. Your a pactard end off. You got nothing to back your BS about Floyd on. You post lie after lie now fack off to pacland.
posted on 15/2/15
You never seen Thurman fight.
posted on 15/2/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/2/15
http://forum.philboxing.com/ There you go. You will fit right in with your bf D4.
posted on 15/2/15
Is the fight at 147?
posted on 15/2/15
Nah 140
Hopefully it's for the vacant WBO title that got stripped off Algieri (disgracefully). Rumour has it Crawford will be fighting for it on April 18th
posted on 15/2/15
comment by Larry Holmes Jab (U20302)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 48 seconds ago
We got a name for people like you. Its called a pactard and they belong on the pacland forum. And dont lie you never heard of Thurman until recently
-------------------------------
If I'm such a Pactard then why have I stated on several occasions that Floyd probably beats Pacquiao ??
Because you post absolute bile about Mayweather. Your a pactard end off. You got nothing to back your BS about Floyd on. You post lie after lie now fack off to pacland.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ironic that someone that talks as much biased nonsense as you can accuse someone else of talking bile.
As for the Mayweather Pacquiao fight I'm desperate to see that fight happen and have been for 6 years.
I think it's farcical that we've had to wait this long for the fight. Even if they do make this fight happen now it's not as if we're seeing them fight at the peak of their powers and I find that really frustrating.
Page 2 of 3