comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 1 second ago
anyone done a total cost of squad one of these?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would be interesting. No necessary the full squad but at least the starting XI
kind of have to do the 23
otherwise people would pick and choose who goes in
and Di Maria would be on the subs bench
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 9 seconds ago
kind of have to do the 23
otherwise people would pick and choose who goes in
and Di Maria would be on the subs bench
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good point.
Where is Hafi when you need him?!
TKT, wait till after this summer, and United's will definitely be the highest
To keep it consistent, we should just do the most expensive 11. Obviously with people in position.
Would be skewed also with the likes of Carrick costing £18m for example, because we bought him 8 years ago. If we signed him at the same stage now, he'd be £50m at least. True story.
comment by HoltbyCity (U17197)
posted 19 minutes ago
but Arsenal are better.
Net spend on transfers over the last 5 seasons.
Done over this period of time because you can purchase a good 23/24 year old and by right he should still be with you - 28/29 year old.
Manchester City = £328.1 million.
United - £273.7 million.
Chelsea - £272.2 million.
Arsenal = £95.9 million.
Everton = £25.2 million
Spurs = -£22 million
Didn't bother with the other teams because they're not big clubs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someones slightly wound up lol
P.s spurs are not a big club
comment by HoltbyCity (U17197)
posted 18 minutes ago
but Arsenal are better.
Net spend on transfers over the last 5 seasons.
Done over this period of time because you can purchase a good 23/24 year old and by right he should still be with you - 28/29 year old.
Manchester City = £328.1 million.
United - £273.7 million.
Chelsea - £272.2 million.
Arsenal = £95.9 million.
Everton = £25.2 million
Spurs = -£22 million
Didn't bother with the other teams because they're not big clubs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everton £25.2 million ????
WRONG.
Everton = £3.9 million.
Get it Right.
comment by Giroud ..IN THE BIN!! (U10012)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 1 second ago
anyone done a total cost of squad one of these?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would be interesting. No necessary the full squad but at least the starting XI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost of squad, players that were purchased in brackets, the rest would be free or youth to make up the quota.
United = £371m (19 players).
City = £366.9m (19).
Chelsea = £311.5m (20).
Arsenal = £229.9m (19).
Liverpool = £228.2m (23).
Spurs = £170.4m (21).
All purchases made up to the end of the last transfer window.
,
And yet, they're better. Again.
comment by HoltbyCity (U17197)
posted 2 minutes ago
,
And yet, they're better. Again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I could list the amount of European trophies won, you can carry on laughing then !!
comment by (U20555)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Giroud ..IN THE BIN!! (U10012)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 1 second ago
anyone done a total cost of squad one of these?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would be interesting. No necessary the full squad but at least the starting XI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost of squad, players that were purchased in brackets, the rest would be free or youth to make up the quota.
United = £371m (19 players).
City = £366.9m (19).
Chelsea = £311.5m (20).
Arsenal = £229.9m (19).
Liverpool = £228.2m (23).
Spurs = £170.4m (21).
All purchases made up to the end of the last transfer window.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
wow.. I know United have money but still maybe they should think twice before agreeing fees.
btw.
If you look at our net spend in Fergie's last 5 years and particularly the last two, you'll see why we needed to spend that cash after he left.
Surely he didn't want to blast the cash as he must've known a new manger would probably be doing the same once he retired. Unfortunately for Moyes he couldn't attract the big names.
SAF
If people are counting the cost of the best/most expensive XI's then to do it right you should divide the cost of the player by the years of service he's had at his club. It offers a better view of value for money and highlights good/bad team building.
e.g. Someone costing £20m that has been at their club 2 seasons should have a value of £10m.
You have to consider the situations of each individual club at the time as well.
Net spend over a five-year period seems to indicate the clubs were all starting from roughly similar positions: this time five years ago Manchester City were not even a top four club, for example.
5 years is reasonable and covers a bit of long term planning and established players as well
6 too many
3 not enough as it would exclude too many spine players of mature sides
it's either 4 or 5
(sorry to waffle, thinking it through as typing)
Who did you buy 6 years ago TKT?
We sold Ronaldo 6 years ago. Back then, NET spend was our friend.
comment by Unknown Poster (U15867)
posted 8 hours, 5 minutes ago
If people are counting the cost of the best/most expensive XI's then to do it right you should divide the cost of the player by the years of service he's had at his club. It offers a better view of value for money and highlights good/bad team building.
e.g. Someone costing £20m that has been at their club 2 seasons should have a value of £10m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can be arranged.
Sign in if you want to comment
We're not even close...
Page 2 of 2
posted on 28/6/15
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 1 second ago
anyone done a total cost of squad one of these?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would be interesting. No necessary the full squad but at least the starting XI
posted on 28/6/15
kind of have to do the 23
otherwise people would pick and choose who goes in
and Di Maria would be on the subs bench
posted on 28/6/15
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 9 seconds ago
kind of have to do the 23
otherwise people would pick and choose who goes in
and Di Maria would be on the subs bench
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good point.
Where is Hafi when you need him?!
posted on 28/6/15
TKT, wait till after this summer, and United's will definitely be the highest
posted on 28/6/15
To keep it consistent, we should just do the most expensive 11. Obviously with people in position.
Would be skewed also with the likes of Carrick costing £18m for example, because we bought him 8 years ago. If we signed him at the same stage now, he'd be £50m at least. True story.
posted on 28/6/15
comment by HoltbyCity (U17197)
posted 19 minutes ago
but Arsenal are better.
Net spend on transfers over the last 5 seasons.
Done over this period of time because you can purchase a good 23/24 year old and by right he should still be with you - 28/29 year old.
Manchester City = £328.1 million.
United - £273.7 million.
Chelsea - £272.2 million.
Arsenal = £95.9 million.
Everton = £25.2 million
Spurs = -£22 million
Didn't bother with the other teams because they're not big clubs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someones slightly wound up lol
posted on 28/6/15
P.s spurs are not a big club
posted on 28/6/15
comment by HoltbyCity (U17197)
posted 18 minutes ago
but Arsenal are better.
Net spend on transfers over the last 5 seasons.
Done over this period of time because you can purchase a good 23/24 year old and by right he should still be with you - 28/29 year old.
Manchester City = £328.1 million.
United - £273.7 million.
Chelsea - £272.2 million.
Arsenal = £95.9 million.
Everton = £25.2 million
Spurs = -£22 million
Didn't bother with the other teams because they're not big clubs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everton £25.2 million ????
WRONG.
Everton = £3.9 million.
Get it Right.
posted on 28/6/15
comment by Giroud ..IN THE BIN!! (U10012)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 1 second ago
anyone done a total cost of squad one of these?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would be interesting. No necessary the full squad but at least the starting XI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost of squad, players that were purchased in brackets, the rest would be free or youth to make up the quota.
United = £371m (19 players).
City = £366.9m (19).
Chelsea = £311.5m (20).
Arsenal = £229.9m (19).
Liverpool = £228.2m (23).
Spurs = £170.4m (21).
All purchases made up to the end of the last transfer window.
posted on 28/6/15
,
And yet, they're better. Again.
posted on 28/6/15
comment by HoltbyCity (U17197)
posted 2 minutes ago
,
And yet, they're better. Again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I could list the amount of European trophies won, you can carry on laughing then !!
posted on 28/6/15
comment by (U20555)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Giroud ..IN THE BIN!! (U10012)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 1 second ago
anyone done a total cost of squad one of these?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would be interesting. No necessary the full squad but at least the starting XI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost of squad, players that were purchased in brackets, the rest would be free or youth to make up the quota.
United = £371m (19 players).
City = £366.9m (19).
Chelsea = £311.5m (20).
Arsenal = £229.9m (19).
Liverpool = £228.2m (23).
Spurs = £170.4m (21).
All purchases made up to the end of the last transfer window.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
wow.. I know United have money but still maybe they should think twice before agreeing fees.
btw.
posted on 28/6/15
If you look at our net spend in Fergie's last 5 years and particularly the last two, you'll see why we needed to spend that cash after he left.
Surely he didn't want to blast the cash as he must've known a new manger would probably be doing the same once he retired. Unfortunately for Moyes he couldn't attract the big names.
SAF
posted on 28/6/15
If people are counting the cost of the best/most expensive XI's then to do it right you should divide the cost of the player by the years of service he's had at his club. It offers a better view of value for money and highlights good/bad team building.
e.g. Someone costing £20m that has been at their club 2 seasons should have a value of £10m.
posted on 28/6/15
You have to consider the situations of each individual club at the time as well.
Net spend over a five-year period seems to indicate the clubs were all starting from roughly similar positions: this time five years ago Manchester City were not even a top four club, for example.
posted on 28/6/15
5 years is reasonable and covers a bit of long term planning and established players as well
6 too many
3 not enough as it would exclude too many spine players of mature sides
it's either 4 or 5
(sorry to waffle, thinking it through as typing)
posted on 29/6/15
Who did you buy 6 years ago TKT?
posted on 29/6/15
I've got no clue
posted on 29/6/15
We sold Ronaldo 6 years ago. Back then, NET spend was our friend.
posted on 29/6/15
comment by Unknown Poster (U15867)
posted 8 hours, 5 minutes ago
If people are counting the cost of the best/most expensive XI's then to do it right you should divide the cost of the player by the years of service he's had at his club. It offers a better view of value for money and highlights good/bad team building.
e.g. Someone costing £20m that has been at their club 2 seasons should have a value of £10m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can be arranged.
Page 2 of 2