or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 263 comments are related to an article called:

Obsession

Page 7 of 11

posted on 23/2/17

Wasnt there a crowdfund page from a rangers forum for a private investigator to investigate celtic getting banded about on twitter???

comment by JFK (U8919)

posted on 23/2/17

so to summarise

we aren't obsessed, u fat chumps just cant take a joke.

posted on 23/2/17

"Wasnt there a crowdfund page from a rangers forum for a private investigator to investigate celtic getting banded about on twitter???"


No idea, I don't obsess about Celtic so couldn't tell you .

Of course if they actually paid for someone then they are of course obsessive mentalists.

No tribalism from me

posted on 23/2/17

comment by Ibrox Elite (U5255)
posted 31 seconds ago
"Yes, I think that does show you've not understood why I said that. "


Oh I understood exactly what you were trying to do.

It was irrelevant to the thread tho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Man is paid to discuss what is topical. When it's about Celtic, that's fine. When it's about Rangers, its obsession.

I never brought Sutton into the debate-Smid did.

So, that's 2 things you were wrong about.

Plamf.

posted on 23/2/17

It's awwwww aboot the rangers

posted on 23/2/17

"we aren't obsessed, u fat chumps just cant take a joke."


Like a good joke. I think the crowdfunding for court reports and constant blogging negative stories which aren't true ( Morton Gate receipts just this week) is rather more than a joke.

posted on 23/2/17

"comment by Ibrox Elite (U5255)
posted 31 seconds ago
"Yes, I think that does show you've not understood why I said that. "


Oh I understood exactly what you were trying to do.

It was irrelevant to the thread tho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Man is paid to discuss what is topical. When it's about Celtic, that's fine. When it's about Rangers, its obsession.

I never brought Sutton into the debate-Smid did.

So, that's 2 things you were wrong about.

Plamf."


You didn't say Sutton got tore into deila last season?

I'm not sure I said you specifically brought him into it, just you made a stupid point.?

posted on 23/2/17

"comment by My POV-2 for 2 in name change bets against lauders (U10636)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
I didn't hear Gers fans complaining about Sutton being obsessive last season when he was slagging Deila.
"



Yep, you did say it.

posted on 23/2/17

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 23/2/17

comment by Ibrox Elite (U5255)
posted 20 seconds ago
"comment by My POV-2 for 2 in name change bets against lauders (U10636)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
I didn't hear Gers fans complaining about Sutton being obsessive last season when he was slagging Deila.
"



Yep, you did say it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know I said it-you said my first retort was about Sutton, when it wasn't and I was replying to a comment from Smid!



Your making yourself look silly now.

No-wait-you're already there..

posted on 23/2/17

I think the John James guy is to be complimented for forcing Rangers hand. If he hadn't spoken out Morton would still be waiting for their cash.

posted on 23/2/17

"I know I said it-you said my first retort was about Sutton, when it wasn't and I was replying to a comment from Smid!"


Ah your getting into pedantry now you've lost the argument .

Your a pure riddy

posted on 23/2/17

"think the John James guy is to be complimented for forcing Rangers hand. If he hadn't spoken out Morton would still be waiting for their cash."


I hate to break it to you bud but Morton confirmed they had been paid in time

posted on 23/2/17

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 23/2/17

Vanguard Bears raised thousands to help with legal fees for the thugs who invaded the pitch after the cup final.

I think it was because they were just defending the players (who had all left the pitch by then)

posted on 23/2/17

comment by Ibrox Elite (U5255)
posted 1 minute ago
"I know I said it-you said my first retort was about Sutton, when it wasn't and I was replying to a comment from Smid!"


Ah your getting into pedantry now you've lost the argument .

Your a pure riddy
----------------------------------------------------------------------


How is it pedantry??

I'd already commented on the thread and then responded specifically to a point Smid made!

Seriously-read back. You won't apologise, I know that. But just stop man! For your own sanity-you're becoming obsessive!!

posted on 23/2/17

I hate to break it to you bud but Morton confirmed they had been paid in time
-------------------------------------------------------------------
That was a condition of getting paid......eventually

posted on 23/2/17

"I'd already commented on the thread and then responded specifically to a point Smid made!"


And?

I didnt say you brought Sutton into the thread. Did I?

You then proclaimed "that's two things you've got wrong"




Away have a lie down ffs, your all over the shop

posted on 23/2/17

"Ah your getting into pedantry now you've lost the argument .
======

Kin hell!

There's a kant on here and that's his daily m.o."


Pov? Harsh but true

posted on 23/2/17

"I hate to break it to you bud but Morton confirmed they had been paid in time
-------------------------------------------------------------------
That was a condition of getting paid......eventually"




Doleman and co love bhoys like you !

#donate

posted on 23/2/17

Oh dear-me and my pedantry.

comment by Smid (U13415)
posted 1 minute ago
When you get a guy like Robbie Savage observe that he finds it bizarre that an ex Celtic player spends so much time talking about Rangers then you know you need to reign it in. Robbie Savage FFS.

Personally I am just waiting for Stephane Bonnes to come out and give his opinion on what Rangers should do next as I think he is the only ex Celtic player who hasn't taken the time to comment on it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


See my point above. He's a BT pundit who commentates on Scottish football, and Savage expected him NOT to talk about the Warburton situation??

I think that says more about Savage than it does Sutton.

My next comment was made about Sutton talking about what was topical last season. Which was Deila.

I completely understood the op and was pointing out that sometimes, people in certain positions will talk about what is topical. When he was berating Deila last season, he wasn't called obsessive then. This season, when things are going titties up for the bears and that's what's topical, because he's commenting on it amongst other things suddenly he's obsessive.

Surely now, you can see what I was saying and how it was relevant?? Please tell me you have that modicum of intelligence to see it?!

posted on 23/2/17

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 23/2/17

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 23/2/17

comment by Curly 💩 - I'm mumpsimus and I know it.' (except on a Wednesday, that is my obstreperous day ) (U1103)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by My POV-2 for 2 in name change bets against lauders (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
Oh dear-me and my pedantry.

comment by Smid (U13415)
posted 1 minute ago
When you get a guy like Robbie Savage observe that he finds it bizarre that an ex Celtic player spends so much time talking about Rangers then you know you need to reign it in. Robbie Savage FFS.

Personally I am just waiting for Stephane Bonnes to come out and give his opinion on what Rangers should do next as I think he is the only ex Celtic player who hasn't taken the time to comment on it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


See my point above. He's a BT pundit who commentates on Scottish football, and Savage expected him NOT to talk about the Warburton situation??

I think that says more about Savage than it does Sutton.

My next comment was made about Sutton talking about what was topical last season. Which was Deila.

I completely understood the op and was pointing out that sometimes, people in certain positions will talk about what is topical. When he was berating Deila last season, he wasn't called obsessive then. This season, when things are going titties up for the bears and that's what's topical, because he's commenting on it amongst other things suddenly he's obsessive.

Surely now, you can see what I was saying and how it was relevant?? Please tell me you have that modicum of intelligence to see it?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

FFS POV, its bad enough reading your comments once never mind having to read them again

----------------------------------------------------------------------


Getting right on my titties mumpsimus boy!

posted on 23/2/17

I take it IE is away now the working day is done. This is what you said about my point:

'You leaped in ranting about Sutton the ex Celtic player commenting on Celtic on a thread about ex celts commenting on rangers ffs'

Hopefully now you can see that I didn't. That I was specifically replying to another poster'a point.


A gentleman would take his gloves off and apologise for making a plamf of himself, in this case that would be you. I won't hold my breath.

Page 7 of 11

Sign in if you want to comment