or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 119338 comments are related to an article called:

Arguing w/strangers cause I'm lonely thread

Page 4634 of 4774

posted on 16/9/24

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/sep/16/ireland-apple-13-billion-tax-forced-against-will

Pesky EU forcing companies to pay tax.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Even more staggering is the notion that injecting life into a broken economy is to lower taxation on international and private corporate investment only to find to everyone’s shock and horror that the economy booms.

Amazing stuff really

posted on 16/9/24

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/sep/16/ireland-apple-13-billion-tax-forced-against-will

Pesky EU forcing companies to pay tax.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Even more staggering is the notion that injecting life into a broken economy is to lower taxation on international and private corporate investment only to find to everyone’s shock and horror that the economy booms.

Amazing stuff really
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should share it out among us

posted on 16/9/24

comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/sep/16/ireland-apple-13-billion-tax-forced-against-will

Pesky EU forcing companies to pay tax.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Even more staggering is the notion that injecting life into a broken economy is to lower taxation on international and private corporate investment only to find to everyone’s shock and horror that the economy booms.

Amazing stuff really
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should share it out among us
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Indeed. Get it sent over

posted on 16/9/24

Huw Edwards is given six months' imprisonment suspended for two years with a requirement to complete a seeex offender programme.

Can’t believe he’s not inside for a long time

posted on 16/9/24

The company has no staff and appears to have taken on debt to fund Jenrick

posted on 16/9/24

Edwards got away with it there.

You can’t control the images people send you but you do have the power to delete them

posted on 16/9/24

comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 25 minutes ago
Huw Edwards is given six months' imprisonment suspended for two years with a requirement to complete a seeex offender programme.

Can’t believe he’s not inside for a long time
----------------------------------------------------------------------


not sure that receiving dodgy images on whatsapp is illegal

posted on 16/9/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
Edwards got away with it there.

You can’t control the images people send you but you do have the power to delete them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How you know he got away with it?

posted on 16/9/24

comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 25 minutes ago
Huw Edwards is given six months' imprisonment suspended for two years with a requirement to complete a seeex offender programme.

Can’t believe he’s not inside for a long time
----------------------------------------------------------------------


not sure that receiving dodgy images on whatsapp is illegal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It isn’t, it’s the fact he kept them rather than deleting them.

posted on 16/9/24

I mean he paid for the images, which is why he’s been prosecuted.

I’m not sure what purpose sending him to jail would serve tbh.

posted on 16/9/24

comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
Edwards got away with it there.

You can’t control the images people send you but you do have the power to delete them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How you know he got away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m pretty sure most people with Cat A indecent images of children under 10 on their phones would have got sent down

posted on 16/9/24

comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted about a minute ago
I mean he paid for the images, which is why he’s been prosecuted.

I’m not sure what purpose sending him to jail would serve tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Might deter him from doing it again

posted on 16/9/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 25 minutes ago
Huw Edwards is given six months' imprisonment suspended for two years with a requirement to complete a seeex offender programme.

Can’t believe he’s not inside for a long time
----------------------------------------------------------------------


not sure that receiving dodgy images on whatsapp is illegal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It isn’t, it’s the fact he kept them rather than deleting them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think is more that he vvanked over them rather than not deleting them that irks most people.

posted on 16/9/24

We’re not going to see the images but by all accounts they’re pretty repulsive. A long way down from just pictures of young lads bums.

posted on 16/9/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
We’re not going to see the images but by all accounts they’re pretty repulsive. A long way down from just pictures of young lads bums.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pictures of feet?

posted on 16/9/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
Edwards got away with it there.

You can’t control the images people send you but you do have the power to delete them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How you know he got away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m pretty sure most people with Cat A indecent images of children under 10 on their phones would have got sent down
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A lot get suspended sentences

posted on 16/9/24

Especially Celebrity Nonces

posted on 16/9/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
Edwards got away with it there.

You can’t control the images people send you but you do have the power to delete them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How you know he got away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m pretty sure most people with Cat A indecent images of children under 10 on their phones would have got sent down
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read that law, there are a lot of factors that are looked at, including the conduct of the accused. For instance, I read somewhere he asked not to be sent any illegal stuff. I still think he should have done some jail time, just saying we don't know all the details.

posted on 16/9/24

A federal judge in Manhattan ruled Mr Trump breached Mr Grant's copyright for his 1983 hit, and is now liable for damages as well as paying for the singer's legal fees.

posted on 16/9/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 9 minutes ago
Especially Celebrity Nonces
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should celebrities receive harsher sentences than us average bods?

comment by #4zA (U22472)

posted on 16/9/24

Mosed dangerus italian cities per guvmint n data:
1. Milan
2. Rome
3. Florence
4. Rimini
5. Turin
6. Bologna
7. Prato
8. Imperia
9. Venice
10. Livorno

posted on 16/9/24

comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 28 minutes ago
Mosed dangerus italian cities per guvmint n data:
1. Milan
2. Rome
3. Florence
4. Rimini
5. Turin
6. Bologna
7. Prato
8. Imperia
9. Venice
10. Livorno
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In what way dangerous? Crime?

comment by #4zA (U22472)

posted on 16/9/24

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 28 minutes ago
Mosed dangerus italian cities per guvmint n data:
1. Milan
2. Rome
3. Florence
4. Rimini
5. Turin
6. Bologna
7. Prato
8. Imperia
9. Venice
10. Livorno
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In what way dangerous? Crime?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup

posted on 16/9/24

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 50 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 9 minutes ago
Especially Celebrity Nonces
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should celebrities receive harsher sentences than us average bods?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should they receive lighter sentences?
Oh sorry. They already do.

posted on 16/9/24

Which of them would be a nice holiday, Rome aside as I’ve already been

Page 4634 of 4774

Sign in if you want to comment