Rangers record against Celtic since 2010
P 13
W 3
D 2
L 8
GD -16
7 years of ar$eblasting
Aye bit bit bit Barca and PSG pure humped yous
yup we have been awful against celtic..... If your stat says that we have been awful against you then Brendans record in europe by your logic has been atrocious.
So we have established that Celtic have been better than Rangers over the last 13 games and Celtic have been one of the poorest if not THE poorest team in europe?
Cheers for clearing that up
basically were agreeing that Celtic are pretty much ISIS
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
As Lex said we may be bottom of the pile..
But that pile is only 48 high and we are in it!
We are one of the elite of European football
Thems the facts!
ISIS are the good guys apparently
President Assad ( who is bad ) is a nasty guy who got so nasty his people rebelled and the Rebels ( who are good ) started winning ( Hurrah!).
But then some of the rebels turned a bit nasty and are now called Islamic State ( who are definitely bad!) and some continued to support democracy ( who are still good.)
So the Americans ( who are good ) started bombing Islamic State ( who are bad ) and giving arms to the Syrian Rebels ( who are good ) so they could fight Assad ( who is still bad ) which was good.
By the way, there is a breakaway state in the north run by the Kurds who want to fight IS ( which is a good thing ) but the Turkish authorities think they are bad, so we have to say they are bad whilst secretly thinking they're good and giving them guns to fight IS (which is good) but that is another matter.
Getting back to Syria.
So President Putin ( who is bad, cos he invaded Crimea and the Ukraine and killed lots of folks including that nice Russian man in London with polonium poisoned sushi ) has decided to back Assad ( who is still bad ) by attacking IS ( who are also bad ) which is sort of a good thing?
But Putin ( still bad ) thinks the Syrian Rebels ( who are good ) are also bad, and so he bombs them too, much to the annoyance of the Americans ( who are good ) who are busy backing and arming the rebels ( who are also good).
Now Iran ( who used to be bad, but now they have agreed not to build any nuclear weapons and bomb Israel are now good ) are going to provide ground troops to support Assad ( still bad ) as are the Russians ( bad ) who now have ground troops and aircraft in Syria.
So a Coalition of Assad ( still bad ) Putin ( extra bad ) and the Iranians ( good, but in a bad sort of way ) are going to attack IS ( who are bad ) which is a good thing, but also the Syrian Rebels ( who are good ) which is bad.
Now the British ( obviously good, except that nice Mr Corbyn in the corduroy jacket, who is probably bad ) and the Americans ( also good ) cannot attack Assad ( still bad ) for fear of upsetting Putin ( bad ) and Iran ( good / bad) and now they have to accept that Assad might not be that bad after all compared to IS ( who are super bad).
So Assad ( bad ) is now probably good, being better than IS ( but let’s face it, drinking your own wee is better than IS so no real choice there ) and since Putin and Iran are also fighting IS that may now make them Good. America ( still Good ) will find it hard to arm a group of rebels being attacked by the Russians for fear of upsetting Mr Putin ( now good ) and that nice mad Ayatollah in Iran ( also Good ) and so they may be forced to say that the Rebels are now Bad, or at the very least abandon them to their fate. This will lead most of them to flee to Turkey and on to Europe or join IS ( still the only constantly bad group).
To Sunni Muslims, an attack by Shia Muslims ( Assad and Iran ) backed by Russians will be seen as something of a Holy War, and the ranks of IS will now be seen by the Sunnis as the only Jihadis fighting in the Holy War and hence many Muslims will now see IS as Good ( Doh!.)
Sunni Muslims will also see the lack of action by Britain and America in support of their Sunni rebel brothers as something of a betrayal ( mmm.might have a point.) and hence we will be seen as Bad.
So now we have America ( now bad ) and Britain ( also bad ) providing limited support to Sunni Rebels ( bad ) many of whom are looking to IS ( Good / bad ) for support against Assad ( now good ) who, along with Iran ( also Good) and Putin ( also, now, unbelievably, Good ) are attempting to retake the country Assad used to run before all this started?
comment by lexballielegend (U8325)
posted 1 minute ago
Don't see how a team in Europe after Christmas can be considered THE poorest team in Europe Del, disnae make sense.
Poorer than say Rangers who lost to Progres, both are in Europe but I would say Rangers would be considered by any sane person poorer.
Your argument is schite, just you worry about winning 3 domestic games on the bounce and we will worry about being 1 of only 48 teams left in European competition for the season 2017-2018.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no arguement Lex. All i did was show the stats of BR's record in europe. I didnt say you were the poorest, I said you had ONE of the poorest records in europe over the last two years. In a thread where someone wouldnt throw their toys out the pram and threaten to bring out the filter polis !
It must be quite embarrassing.
A team you don’t rate is a team you can’t beat.
That must hurt. A lot.
comment by Call Sign: Armstong's Sexy Quiff (U3627)
posted 1 minute ago
ISIS are the good guys apparently
President Assad ( who is bad ) is a nasty guy who got so nasty his people rebelled and the Rebels ( who are good ) started winning ( Hurrah!).
But then some of the rebels turned a bit nasty and are now called Islamic State ( who are definitely bad!) and some continued to support democracy ( who are still good.)
So the Americans ( who are good ) started bombing Islamic State ( who are bad ) and giving arms to the Syrian Rebels ( who are good ) so they could fight Assad ( who is still bad ) which was good.
By the way, there is a breakaway state in the north run by the Kurds who want to fight IS ( which is a good thing ) but the Turkish authorities think they are bad, so we have to say they are bad whilst secretly thinking they're good and giving them guns to fight IS (which is good) but that is another matter.
Getting back to Syria.
So President Putin ( who is bad, cos he invaded Crimea and the Ukraine and killed lots of folks including that nice Russian man in London with polonium poisoned sushi ) has decided to back Assad ( who is still bad ) by attacking IS ( who are also bad ) which is sort of a good thing?
But Putin ( still bad ) thinks the Syrian Rebels ( who are good ) are also bad, and so he bombs them too, much to the annoyance of the Americans ( who are good ) who are busy backing and arming the rebels ( who are also good).
Now Iran ( who used to be bad, but now they have agreed not to build any nuclear weapons and bomb Israel are now good ) are going to provide ground troops to support Assad ( still bad ) as are the Russians ( bad ) who now have ground troops and aircraft in Syria.
So a Coalition of Assad ( still bad ) Putin ( extra bad ) and the Iranians ( good, but in a bad sort of way ) are going to attack IS ( who are bad ) which is a good thing, but also the Syrian Rebels ( who are good ) which is bad.
Now the British ( obviously good, except that nice Mr Corbyn in the corduroy jacket, who is probably bad ) and the Americans ( also good ) cannot attack Assad ( still bad ) for fear of upsetting Putin ( bad ) and Iran ( good / bad) and now they have to accept that Assad might not be that bad after all compared to IS ( who are super bad).
So Assad ( bad ) is now probably good, being better than IS ( but let’s face it, drinking your own wee is better than IS so no real choice there ) and since Putin and Iran are also fighting IS that may now make them Good. America ( still Good ) will find it hard to arm a group of rebels being attacked by the Russians for fear of upsetting Mr Putin ( now good ) and that nice mad Ayatollah in Iran ( also Good ) and so they may be forced to say that the Rebels are now Bad, or at the very least abandon them to their fate. This will lead most of them to flee to Turkey and on to Europe or join IS ( still the only constantly bad group).
To Sunni Muslims, an attack by Shia Muslims ( Assad and Iran ) backed by Russians will be seen as something of a Holy War, and the ranks of IS will now be seen by the Sunnis as the only Jihadis fighting in the Holy War and hence many Muslims will now see IS as Good ( Doh!.)
Sunni Muslims will also see the lack of action by Britain and America in support of their Sunni rebel brothers as something of a betrayal ( mmm.might have a point.) and hence we will be seen as Bad.
So now we have America ( now bad ) and Britain ( also bad ) providing limited support to Sunni Rebels ( bad ) many of whom are looking to IS ( Good / bad ) for support against Assad ( now good ) who, along with Iran ( also Good) and Putin ( also, now, unbelievably, Good ) are attempting to retake the country Assad used to run before all this started?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not true
Isis are amateurs compared with Celtics fundamentalism.
And lo, The Blessed St Rodgers of Parkhead said unto his minions, “judge not Celtic by our performances in Europe, judge us, as ever, in comparison with the great Satan, Rangers FC, whose followers mock us constantly. Go now, unto the realm of ja606 and whine like biitches, you stinking rabble”
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
It must be quite embarrassing.
A team you don’t rate is a team you can’t beat.
That must hurt. A lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have accepted that for the time being we are Schite compared to Celtic. See its easy to accept the truth.
See its easy to accept the truth.
................
So you're not the same club?
SEEEEVCO!
And speaking of facts it would help of you got them right
Our record under Brendan is actually
P 24
W 8
D 5
L 10
GS 37
GC 45
GD -8
But that doesn't meet your agenda does it
That should read 6 draws
Missed out a 0 - 0 scoreline
I was showing stats that were not qualifying stats. I dont count teams that dont qualify for the full stages (for eg I dont include us) much like I dont include Scotland as one of the world cup teams despite playing in the qualifiers.
comment by delboy82 (U7141)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
It must be quite embarrassing.
A team you don’t rate is a team you can’t beat.
That must hurt. A lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have accepted that for the time being we are Schite compared to Celtic. See its easy to accept the truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it is.
You’ll be able to accept then that if for 2 or 3 seasons you don’t qualify for a competition, then the next season you do but finish 4th, and the next season you qualify again and finish 3rd, then you’re progressing.
Would that be fair?
comment by Mickey Miller aka Joe Swash aka Just Joe.. I used to be a big deal (U15888)
posted 46 seconds ago
And speaking of facts it would help of you got them right
Our record under Brendan is actually
P 24
W 8
D 5
L 10
GS 37
GC 45
GD -8
But that doesn't meet your agenda does it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If only you had got a result in Gibraltar that would have looked so much better
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by delboy82 (U7141)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
It must be quite embarrassing.
A team you don’t rate is a team you can’t beat.
That must hurt. A lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have accepted that for the time being we are Schite compared to Celtic. See its easy to accept the truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it is.
You’ll be able to accept then that if for 2 or 3 seasons you don’t qualify for a competition, then the next season you do but finish 4th, and the next season you qualify again and finish 3rd, then you’re progressing.
Would that be fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If buts n maybe's.
If we win the league this year .... what ? Thats no different than the IF statement you just made.
Facts POV this is about FACTS
You’d love to be under Brendan.
His cassock flapping in the wind, the moonlight glinting on his teeth as he pounds away at your farter, shouting at you to scream the names of the Lisbon Lions as he reaches climax under the benevolent gaze of the Brother Walfrid statue. As he pulls out and wipes himself on your replica replica top you gaze around the barren car park, the wet asphalt black as St Brendan’s dilated pupils and realize that he’s not a good man at all. But you still love him. Forever.
comment by Big Eck(Back for more?) (U6032)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Mickey Miller aka Joe Swash aka Just Joe.. I used to be a big deal (U15888)
posted 46 seconds ago
And speaking of facts it would help of you got them right
Our record under Brendan is actually
P 24
W 8
D 5
L 10
GS 37
GC 45
GD -8
But that doesn't meet your agenda does it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If only you had got a result in Gibraltar that would have looked so much better
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Qualifier .... I dont count them. According to Mickey Scotland have played 10 games in next years world cup already!
comment by delboy82 (U7141)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by delboy82 (U7141)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
It must be quite embarrassing.
A team you don’t rate is a team you can’t beat.
That must hurt. A lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have accepted that for the time being we are Schite compared to Celtic. See its easy to accept the truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it is.
You’ll be able to accept then that if for 2 or 3 seasons you don’t qualify for a competition, then the next season you do but finish 4th, and the next season you qualify again and finish 3rd, then you’re progressing.
Would that be fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If buts n maybe's.
If we win the league this year .... what ? Thats no different than the IF statement you just made.
Facts POV this is about FACTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, it is a fact that the scenario I gave is Celtic in the CL then.
You agree that is progress then?
We qualified more easily this year than last. Fact
We got more points in champs league than last year. Fact
We are in Europe after Christmas. Fact
Rangers are a new club. Fact
Deleting this post is admission of the above statement. Fact
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by delboy82 (U7141)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by delboy82 (U7141)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
It must be quite embarrassing.
A team you don’t rate is a team you can’t beat.
That must hurt. A lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have accepted that for the time being we are Schite compared to Celtic. See its easy to accept the truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it is.
You’ll be able to accept then that if for 2 or 3 seasons you don’t qualify for a competition, then the next season you do but finish 4th, and the next season you qualify again and finish 3rd, then you’re progressing.
Would that be fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If buts n maybe's.
If we win the league this year .... what ? Thats no different than the IF statement you just made.
Facts POV this is about FACTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, it is a fact that the scenario I gave is Celtic in the CL then.
You agree that is progress then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no they aint your in the europa. Please note that the topic is not what euro comp Celtic have been knocked out of. Its BR's record
comment by simon_bhoy - the happiest tim in the world (U16215)
posted 15 seconds ago
We qualified more easily this year than last. Fact
We got more points in champs league than last year. Fact
We are in Europe after Christmas. Fact
Rangers are a new club. Fact
Deleting this post is admission of the above statement. Fact
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong thread ... nothing getting deleted here
Qualifier .... I dont count them. According to Mickey Scotland have played 10 games in next years world cup already
---------------
Seems like big Pedro didn't count them either
Aye bit bit bit we don't count qualifiers
We shouldnae play qualifiers cause we arra peepel
Sign in if you want to comment
People who know facts
Page 1 of 4
posted on 7/12/17
Rangers record against Celtic since 2010
P 13
W 3
D 2
L 8
GD -16
7 years of ar$eblasting
Aye bit bit bit Barca and PSG pure humped yous
posted on 7/12/17
yup we have been awful against celtic..... If your stat says that we have been awful against you then Brendans record in europe by your logic has been atrocious.
So we have established that Celtic have been better than Rangers over the last 13 games and Celtic have been one of the poorest if not THE poorest team in europe?
Cheers for clearing that up
posted on 7/12/17
basically were agreeing that Celtic are pretty much ISIS
posted on 7/12/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/12/17
As Lex said we may be bottom of the pile..
But that pile is only 48 high and we are in it!
We are one of the elite of European football
Thems the facts!
posted on 7/12/17
ISIS are the good guys apparently
President Assad ( who is bad ) is a nasty guy who got so nasty his people rebelled and the Rebels ( who are good ) started winning ( Hurrah!).
But then some of the rebels turned a bit nasty and are now called Islamic State ( who are definitely bad!) and some continued to support democracy ( who are still good.)
So the Americans ( who are good ) started bombing Islamic State ( who are bad ) and giving arms to the Syrian Rebels ( who are good ) so they could fight Assad ( who is still bad ) which was good.
By the way, there is a breakaway state in the north run by the Kurds who want to fight IS ( which is a good thing ) but the Turkish authorities think they are bad, so we have to say they are bad whilst secretly thinking they're good and giving them guns to fight IS (which is good) but that is another matter.
Getting back to Syria.
So President Putin ( who is bad, cos he invaded Crimea and the Ukraine and killed lots of folks including that nice Russian man in London with polonium poisoned sushi ) has decided to back Assad ( who is still bad ) by attacking IS ( who are also bad ) which is sort of a good thing?
But Putin ( still bad ) thinks the Syrian Rebels ( who are good ) are also bad, and so he bombs them too, much to the annoyance of the Americans ( who are good ) who are busy backing and arming the rebels ( who are also good).
Now Iran ( who used to be bad, but now they have agreed not to build any nuclear weapons and bomb Israel are now good ) are going to provide ground troops to support Assad ( still bad ) as are the Russians ( bad ) who now have ground troops and aircraft in Syria.
So a Coalition of Assad ( still bad ) Putin ( extra bad ) and the Iranians ( good, but in a bad sort of way ) are going to attack IS ( who are bad ) which is a good thing, but also the Syrian Rebels ( who are good ) which is bad.
Now the British ( obviously good, except that nice Mr Corbyn in the corduroy jacket, who is probably bad ) and the Americans ( also good ) cannot attack Assad ( still bad ) for fear of upsetting Putin ( bad ) and Iran ( good / bad) and now they have to accept that Assad might not be that bad after all compared to IS ( who are super bad).
So Assad ( bad ) is now probably good, being better than IS ( but let’s face it, drinking your own wee is better than IS so no real choice there ) and since Putin and Iran are also fighting IS that may now make them Good. America ( still Good ) will find it hard to arm a group of rebels being attacked by the Russians for fear of upsetting Mr Putin ( now good ) and that nice mad Ayatollah in Iran ( also Good ) and so they may be forced to say that the Rebels are now Bad, or at the very least abandon them to their fate. This will lead most of them to flee to Turkey and on to Europe or join IS ( still the only constantly bad group).
To Sunni Muslims, an attack by Shia Muslims ( Assad and Iran ) backed by Russians will be seen as something of a Holy War, and the ranks of IS will now be seen by the Sunnis as the only Jihadis fighting in the Holy War and hence many Muslims will now see IS as Good ( Doh!.)
Sunni Muslims will also see the lack of action by Britain and America in support of their Sunni rebel brothers as something of a betrayal ( mmm.might have a point.) and hence we will be seen as Bad.
So now we have America ( now bad ) and Britain ( also bad ) providing limited support to Sunni Rebels ( bad ) many of whom are looking to IS ( Good / bad ) for support against Assad ( now good ) who, along with Iran ( also Good) and Putin ( also, now, unbelievably, Good ) are attempting to retake the country Assad used to run before all this started?
posted on 7/12/17
comment by lexballielegend (U8325)
posted 1 minute ago
Don't see how a team in Europe after Christmas can be considered THE poorest team in Europe Del, disnae make sense.
Poorer than say Rangers who lost to Progres, both are in Europe but I would say Rangers would be considered by any sane person poorer.
Your argument is schite, just you worry about winning 3 domestic games on the bounce and we will worry about being 1 of only 48 teams left in European competition for the season 2017-2018.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no arguement Lex. All i did was show the stats of BR's record in europe. I didnt say you were the poorest, I said you had ONE of the poorest records in europe over the last two years. In a thread where someone wouldnt throw their toys out the pram and threaten to bring out the filter polis !
posted on 7/12/17
It must be quite embarrassing.
A team you don’t rate is a team you can’t beat.
That must hurt. A lot.
posted on 7/12/17
comment by Call Sign: Armstong's Sexy Quiff (U3627)
posted 1 minute ago
ISIS are the good guys apparently
President Assad ( who is bad ) is a nasty guy who got so nasty his people rebelled and the Rebels ( who are good ) started winning ( Hurrah!).
But then some of the rebels turned a bit nasty and are now called Islamic State ( who are definitely bad!) and some continued to support democracy ( who are still good.)
So the Americans ( who are good ) started bombing Islamic State ( who are bad ) and giving arms to the Syrian Rebels ( who are good ) so they could fight Assad ( who is still bad ) which was good.
By the way, there is a breakaway state in the north run by the Kurds who want to fight IS ( which is a good thing ) but the Turkish authorities think they are bad, so we have to say they are bad whilst secretly thinking they're good and giving them guns to fight IS (which is good) but that is another matter.
Getting back to Syria.
So President Putin ( who is bad, cos he invaded Crimea and the Ukraine and killed lots of folks including that nice Russian man in London with polonium poisoned sushi ) has decided to back Assad ( who is still bad ) by attacking IS ( who are also bad ) which is sort of a good thing?
But Putin ( still bad ) thinks the Syrian Rebels ( who are good ) are also bad, and so he bombs them too, much to the annoyance of the Americans ( who are good ) who are busy backing and arming the rebels ( who are also good).
Now Iran ( who used to be bad, but now they have agreed not to build any nuclear weapons and bomb Israel are now good ) are going to provide ground troops to support Assad ( still bad ) as are the Russians ( bad ) who now have ground troops and aircraft in Syria.
So a Coalition of Assad ( still bad ) Putin ( extra bad ) and the Iranians ( good, but in a bad sort of way ) are going to attack IS ( who are bad ) which is a good thing, but also the Syrian Rebels ( who are good ) which is bad.
Now the British ( obviously good, except that nice Mr Corbyn in the corduroy jacket, who is probably bad ) and the Americans ( also good ) cannot attack Assad ( still bad ) for fear of upsetting Putin ( bad ) and Iran ( good / bad) and now they have to accept that Assad might not be that bad after all compared to IS ( who are super bad).
So Assad ( bad ) is now probably good, being better than IS ( but let’s face it, drinking your own wee is better than IS so no real choice there ) and since Putin and Iran are also fighting IS that may now make them Good. America ( still Good ) will find it hard to arm a group of rebels being attacked by the Russians for fear of upsetting Mr Putin ( now good ) and that nice mad Ayatollah in Iran ( also Good ) and so they may be forced to say that the Rebels are now Bad, or at the very least abandon them to their fate. This will lead most of them to flee to Turkey and on to Europe or join IS ( still the only constantly bad group).
To Sunni Muslims, an attack by Shia Muslims ( Assad and Iran ) backed by Russians will be seen as something of a Holy War, and the ranks of IS will now be seen by the Sunnis as the only Jihadis fighting in the Holy War and hence many Muslims will now see IS as Good ( Doh!.)
Sunni Muslims will also see the lack of action by Britain and America in support of their Sunni rebel brothers as something of a betrayal ( mmm.might have a point.) and hence we will be seen as Bad.
So now we have America ( now bad ) and Britain ( also bad ) providing limited support to Sunni Rebels ( bad ) many of whom are looking to IS ( Good / bad ) for support against Assad ( now good ) who, along with Iran ( also Good) and Putin ( also, now, unbelievably, Good ) are attempting to retake the country Assad used to run before all this started?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not true
posted on 7/12/17
Isis are amateurs compared with Celtics fundamentalism.
And lo, The Blessed St Rodgers of Parkhead said unto his minions, “judge not Celtic by our performances in Europe, judge us, as ever, in comparison with the great Satan, Rangers FC, whose followers mock us constantly. Go now, unto the realm of ja606 and whine like biitches, you stinking rabble”
posted on 7/12/17
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
It must be quite embarrassing.
A team you don’t rate is a team you can’t beat.
That must hurt. A lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have accepted that for the time being we are Schite compared to Celtic. See its easy to accept the truth.
posted on 7/12/17
See its easy to accept the truth.
................
So you're not the same club?
SEEEEVCO!
posted on 7/12/17
And speaking of facts it would help of you got them right
Our record under Brendan is actually
P 24
W 8
D 5
L 10
GS 37
GC 45
GD -8
But that doesn't meet your agenda does it
posted on 7/12/17
That should read 6 draws
Missed out a 0 - 0 scoreline
posted on 7/12/17
I was showing stats that were not qualifying stats. I dont count teams that dont qualify for the full stages (for eg I dont include us) much like I dont include Scotland as one of the world cup teams despite playing in the qualifiers.
posted on 7/12/17
comment by delboy82 (U7141)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
It must be quite embarrassing.
A team you don’t rate is a team you can’t beat.
That must hurt. A lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have accepted that for the time being we are Schite compared to Celtic. See its easy to accept the truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it is.
You’ll be able to accept then that if for 2 or 3 seasons you don’t qualify for a competition, then the next season you do but finish 4th, and the next season you qualify again and finish 3rd, then you’re progressing.
Would that be fair?
posted on 7/12/17
comment by Mickey Miller aka Joe Swash aka Just Joe.. I used to be a big deal (U15888)
posted 46 seconds ago
And speaking of facts it would help of you got them right
Our record under Brendan is actually
P 24
W 8
D 5
L 10
GS 37
GC 45
GD -8
But that doesn't meet your agenda does it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If only you had got a result in Gibraltar that would have looked so much better
posted on 7/12/17
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by delboy82 (U7141)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
It must be quite embarrassing.
A team you don’t rate is a team you can’t beat.
That must hurt. A lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have accepted that for the time being we are Schite compared to Celtic. See its easy to accept the truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it is.
You’ll be able to accept then that if for 2 or 3 seasons you don’t qualify for a competition, then the next season you do but finish 4th, and the next season you qualify again and finish 3rd, then you’re progressing.
Would that be fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If buts n maybe's.
If we win the league this year .... what ? Thats no different than the IF statement you just made.
Facts POV this is about FACTS
posted on 7/12/17
You’d love to be under Brendan.
His cassock flapping in the wind, the moonlight glinting on his teeth as he pounds away at your farter, shouting at you to scream the names of the Lisbon Lions as he reaches climax under the benevolent gaze of the Brother Walfrid statue. As he pulls out and wipes himself on your replica replica top you gaze around the barren car park, the wet asphalt black as St Brendan’s dilated pupils and realize that he’s not a good man at all. But you still love him. Forever.
posted on 7/12/17
comment by Big Eck(Back for more?) (U6032)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Mickey Miller aka Joe Swash aka Just Joe.. I used to be a big deal (U15888)
posted 46 seconds ago
And speaking of facts it would help of you got them right
Our record under Brendan is actually
P 24
W 8
D 5
L 10
GS 37
GC 45
GD -8
But that doesn't meet your agenda does it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If only you had got a result in Gibraltar that would have looked so much better
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Qualifier .... I dont count them. According to Mickey Scotland have played 10 games in next years world cup already!
posted on 7/12/17
comment by delboy82 (U7141)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by delboy82 (U7141)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
It must be quite embarrassing.
A team you don’t rate is a team you can’t beat.
That must hurt. A lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have accepted that for the time being we are Schite compared to Celtic. See its easy to accept the truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it is.
You’ll be able to accept then that if for 2 or 3 seasons you don’t qualify for a competition, then the next season you do but finish 4th, and the next season you qualify again and finish 3rd, then you’re progressing.
Would that be fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If buts n maybe's.
If we win the league this year .... what ? Thats no different than the IF statement you just made.
Facts POV this is about FACTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, it is a fact that the scenario I gave is Celtic in the CL then.
You agree that is progress then?
posted on 7/12/17
We qualified more easily this year than last. Fact
We got more points in champs league than last year. Fact
We are in Europe after Christmas. Fact
Rangers are a new club. Fact
Deleting this post is admission of the above statement. Fact
posted on 7/12/17
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by delboy82 (U7141)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by delboy82 (U7141)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by My POV-I once misread the word monoglot, but I think I got away with it (U10636)
posted 3 seconds ago
It must be quite embarrassing.
A team you don’t rate is a team you can’t beat.
That must hurt. A lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have accepted that for the time being we are Schite compared to Celtic. See its easy to accept the truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it is.
You’ll be able to accept then that if for 2 or 3 seasons you don’t qualify for a competition, then the next season you do but finish 4th, and the next season you qualify again and finish 3rd, then you’re progressing.
Would that be fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If buts n maybe's.
If we win the league this year .... what ? Thats no different than the IF statement you just made.
Facts POV this is about FACTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, it is a fact that the scenario I gave is Celtic in the CL then.
You agree that is progress then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no they aint your in the europa. Please note that the topic is not what euro comp Celtic have been knocked out of. Its BR's record
posted on 7/12/17
comment by simon_bhoy - the happiest tim in the world (U16215)
posted 15 seconds ago
We qualified more easily this year than last. Fact
We got more points in champs league than last year. Fact
We are in Europe after Christmas. Fact
Rangers are a new club. Fact
Deleting this post is admission of the above statement. Fact
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong thread ... nothing getting deleted here
posted on 7/12/17
Qualifier .... I dont count them. According to Mickey Scotland have played 10 games in next years world cup already
---------------
Seems like big Pedro didn't count them either
Aye bit bit bit we don't count qualifiers
We shouldnae play qualifiers cause we arra peepel
Page 1 of 4