Has it been proved canelo was taking peds?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I've never liked Canelo tbh. Happy he's been caught. Wouldn't mind at all if he was kicked out of boxing.

comment by Tu Meke Ainsley (U3732)
posted 4 minutes ago
Has it been proved canelo was taking peds?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he was. His levels are 6 times higher than that cyclist that was doping like crazy.

He been on gear for years.

comment by The Guvnor XI -Iron sharpens Iron- (U12889)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke Ainsley(U3732)
posted about a minute ago
Has it been proved canelo was taking peds?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes me laugh, all you Floyd fanboys who were saying they are anti drug and want to clean up boxing are the ones defending Alvaroid for his blatant cheating.

comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 4 minutes ago
I've never liked Canelo tbh. Happy he's been caught. Wouldn't mind at all if he was kicked out of boxing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If there was any justice he would be behind bars.

comment by The Guvnor XI -Iron sharpens Iron- (U12889)
posted 5 minutes ago
PED's are rife in the sport. Let's not pretend otherwise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Too bad he couldn't get a TUE like Mayweather.

I don't get why they can still box when it's being investigated? If a boxer was taking PED's they could do some serious damage in the ring.

Alvaroid

How often are they drug tested?

Wouldn't say much for Canelo if he was on PEDs while fighting GGG, and still couldn't beat him when he should have in fact lost.

comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 25 seconds ago
I don't get why they can still box when it's being investigated? If a boxer was taking PED's they could do some serious damage in the ring.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because it comes down to money. Everyone benefits from a big fight. Every one gets paid. The boxing commission, the drug testers, the belt organisations. If there's no fight, the above don't get paid a penny or not as much

comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted about a minute ago
I don't get why they can still box when it's being investigated? If a boxer was taking PED's they could do some serious damage in the ring.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the fight will bring in close to a quarter of a billion to boxing.

Boxing is a corrupt sport, in case you didn't notice

comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 25 seconds ago
I don't get why they can still box when it's being investigated? If a boxer was taking PED's they could do some serious damage in the ring.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because it comes down to money. Everyone benefits from a big fight. Every one gets paid. The boxing commission, the drug testers, the belt organisations. If there's no fight, the above don't get paid a penny or not as much
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah true. Boxing just seems lax when it comes to drug testing and punishments too compared to other sports.

comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted about a minute ago
How often are they drug tested?

Wouldn't say much for Canelo if he was on PEDs while fighting GGG, and still couldn't beat him when he should have in fact lost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He been on it for years, has all the signs of it, and his transformation into a quick monster puncher was suspicious. A fews years earlier he was struggling with Matthew Hatton.

The levels of Clen in his system and how NSAC and Golden Boy tried to cover it up with their fake meat excuse shows they are all in on it.

And GGG is a calm dude, but dirty cheat Clenelo really pi$$ed him off

comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 25 seconds ago
I don't get why they can still box when it's being investigated? If a boxer was taking PED's they could do some serious damage in the ring.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because it comes down to money. Everyone benefits from a big fight. Every one gets paid. The boxing commission, the drug testers, the belt organisations. If there's no fight, the above don't get paid a penny or not as much
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah true. Boxing just seems lax when it comes to drug testing and punishments too compared to other sports.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They always favor the money man, and that is why they get these crazy decisions

comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted about a minute ago
How often are they drug tested?

Wouldn't say much for Canelo if he was on PEDs while fighting GGG, and still couldn't beat him when he should have in fact lost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He been on it for years, has all the signs of it, and his transformation into a quick monster puncher was suspicious. A fews years earlier he was struggling with Matthew Hatton.

The levels of Clen in his system and how NSAC and Golden Boy tried to cover it up with their fake meat excuse shows they are all in on it.

And GGG is a calm dude, but dirty cheat Clenelo really pi$$ed him off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I already find it suspicious that he's ginger yet a Mexican but I don't know if the PEDs have anything to do with that.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

The biggest indicator IMO was how he was able to cut so much weight, and be so huge fight night.

With clenbuterol you can do that, burns fats, and builds muscle.

But that was not the only thing he was on.

comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 1 minute ago
Kahn would get knocked out by a jack in the box
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
i can imagine him on that punch machine missing a punch and the bag comes back and taps him on the chin and he's out cold

Fight won't happen, Nevada themselves filed a complaint against Canelo

Anyway good night as always laters all

Price gets my performance of the night, showed a lot of heart and guts, even after being knocked down in the 3rd still got back up and rocked Povetkin's world shame there was no time left, wobbled him a few times and put in a brave performance

Joshua fought like klitchsko jab and hold and get a ref that will break things up. After bringing so many to boxing fights like that are no good. Ref in way over his head, commentary giving biased views (apart from froch who has the most reason to be biased with mccracken his ex coach) and a dull undercard but for price. Parker had a few things going for him, if the ref had let things go inside it'd have been better. Credit to Joshua obviously for the win but imo Wilder and fury beat him.

Also what was with interviewing Hearn mid fight. He's a promoter not an analyst. Absolute joke, should've interviewed Higgins for good measure.

The ref was either awful or paid off. Hopefully just awful. I wanted AJ to win but the ref kept breaking them up everytime they got close which isn't correct, boxers are allowed to fight close quarters under Queensbury rules unless there's been some rule change I wasn't made aware of.

The ref is there to break them up if there's clinching, holding etc but incredibly this ref was stepping in every time they got close and started exchanging. That's not right. It stopped Parker from starting anything from the inside which realistically was his only way of winning this fight when you consider his reach and size disadvantage etc.