Just means a world record fee is required to buy him now.
Probably about twice the amount Barca will nick Salah off you for.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Bennyville (U8058)
posted 3 minutes ago
Probably about twice the amount Barca will nick Salah off you for.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
??
OP - 7-y-olds should be in bed by now. Go and play with your dolls and leave the footy chat to the adults.
“It's a well known trend in football that clubs will secure contracts with players they intend to sell, or that wish to go.”
In which case every single player with a contract in world football is up for grabs. Including yours.
Even if Kane was to move on it would be for a fee significantly higher than £70m
I'm sure the article is a wind up but Kane will give it at least one season in the new stadium.
If Spurs win a trophy next season I think that would pretty much guarantee another season.
That said, I would expect him to have moved on before he is 27 if he has genuine aspirations of winning the League Title and/or the CL.
I don't see Spurs winning either competition at the expense of City, United or Liverpool in the next 5 years.
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 42 minutes ago
Even if Kane was to move on it would be for a fee significantly higher than £70m
I'm sure the article is a wind up but Kane will give it at least one season in the new stadium.
If Spurs win a trophy next season I think that would pretty much guarantee another season.
That said, I would expect him to have moved on before he is 27 if he has genuine aspirations of winning the League Title and/or the CL.
I don't see Spurs winning either competition at the expense of City, United or Liverpool in the next 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool
How do you know what is going to happen in the next five years?
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 42 minutes ago
Even if Kane was to move on it would be for a fee significantly higher than £70m
I'm sure the article is a wind up but Kane will give it at least one season in the new stadium.
If Spurs win a trophy next season I think that would pretty much guarantee another season.
That said, I would expect him to have moved on before he is 27 if he has genuine aspirations of winning the League Title and/or the CL.
I don't see Spurs winning either competition at the expense of City, United or Liverpool in the next 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool
How do you know what is going to happen in the next five years?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t
Laugh at Liverpool all you want.
They are, in my opinion, more likely to challenge for the top honours in the coming seasons.
That opinion is based on their performances against City this past season, which gives me the sense they will be City's main challengers in 2018/19 and beyond.
If you feel different, put forward a constructive argument.
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 8 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 42 minutes ago
Even if Kane was to move on it would be for a fee significantly higher than £70m
I'm sure the article is a wind up but Kane will give it at least one season in the new stadium.
If Spurs win a trophy next season I think that would pretty much guarantee another season.
That said, I would expect him to have moved on before he is 27 if he has genuine aspirations of winning the League Title and/or the CL.
I don't see Spurs winning either competition at the expense of City, United or Liverpool in the next 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool
How do you know what is going to happen in the next five years?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t
Laugh at Liverpool all you want.
They are, in my opinion, more likely to challenge for the top honours in the coming seasons.
That opinion is based on their performances against City this past season, which gives me the sense they will be City's main challengers in 2018/19 and beyond.
If you feel different, put forward a constructive argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool beating City is not a constructive argument for them doing well, they are your bogey team, Liverpool beat you when you are good or bad. How many times have Cityy won at Anfield in the past 30 years?
Spurs finishing above Liverpool year on year is a more constructive argument to why Liverpool won't do as well as you think.
comment by THudd. (U1029)
posted 18 hours, 9 minutes ago
Can I have some facts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your a hand pump...FACT.
Excellent effort OP.
I think every single spudling has taken a nibble here
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 15 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 42 minutes ago
Even if Kane was to move on it would be for a fee significantly higher than £70m
I'm sure the article is a wind up but Kane will give it at least one season in the new stadium.
If Spurs win a trophy next season I think that would pretty much guarantee another season.
That said, I would expect him to have moved on before he is 27 if he has genuine aspirations of winning the League Title and/or the CL.
I don't see Spurs winning either competition at the expense of City, United or Liverpool in the next 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool
How do you know what is going to happen in the next five years?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t
Laugh at Liverpool all you want.
They are, in my opinion, more likely to challenge for the top honours in the coming seasons.
That opinion is based on their performances against City this past season, which gives me the sense they will be City's main challengers in 2018/19 and beyond.
If you feel different, put forward a constructive argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because that's how it works
City bottle it against their bogey side over 2 legs and it makes the opposition's next 5yrs rosy
That's a fact is "fake News". Big Time rubbish!
OP you do realise Kane pretty much signs a new contract every year!
Looks like I will be proven right.
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted on 9/6/18
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 15 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 42 minutes ago
Even if Kane was to move on it would be for a fee significantly higher than £70m
I'm sure the article is a wind up but Kane will give it at least one season in the new stadium.
If Spurs win a trophy next season I think that would pretty much guarantee another season.
That said, I would expect him to have moved on before he is 27 if he has genuine aspirations of winning the League Title and/or the CL.
I don't see Spurs winning either competition at the expense of City, United or Liverpool in the next 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool
How do you know what is going to happen in the next five years?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t
Laugh at Liverpool all you want.
They are, in my opinion, more likely to challenge for the top honours in the coming seasons.
That opinion is based on their performances against City this past season, which gives me the sense they will be City's main challengers in 2018/19 and beyond.
If you feel different, put forward a constructive argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because that's how it works
City bottle it against their bogey side over 2 legs and it makes the opposition's next 5yrs rosy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted on 9/6/18
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 8 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 42 minutes ago
Even if Kane was to move on it would be for a fee significantly higher than £70m
I'm sure the article is a wind up but Kane will give it at least one season in the new stadium.
If Spurs win a trophy next season I think that would pretty much guarantee another season.
That said, I would expect him to have moved on before he is 27 if he has genuine aspirations of winning the League Title and/or the CL.
I don't see Spurs winning either competition at the expense of City, United or Liverpool in the next 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool
How do you know what is going to happen in the next five years?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t
Laugh at Liverpool all you want.
They are, in my opinion, more likely to challenge for the top honours in the coming seasons.
That opinion is based on their performances against City this past season, which gives me the sense they will be City's main challengers in 2018/19 and beyond.
If you feel different, put forward a constructive argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool beating City is not a constructive argument for them doing well, they are your bogey team, Liverpool beat you when you are good or bad. How many times have Cityy won at Anfield in the past 30 years?
Spurs finishing above Liverpool year on year is a more constructive argument to why Liverpool won't do as well as you think.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From this to Poch out.
Sign in if you want to comment
That's Kane gone then
Page 3 of 3
posted on 8/6/18
Just means a world record fee is required to buy him now.
posted on 8/6/18
Probably about twice the amount Barca will nick Salah off you for.
posted on 8/6/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/6/18
comment by Bennyville (U8058)
posted 3 minutes ago
Probably about twice the amount Barca will nick Salah off you for.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
??
posted on 8/6/18
OP - 7-y-olds should be in bed by now. Go and play with your dolls and leave the footy chat to the adults.
posted on 8/6/18
“It's a well known trend in football that clubs will secure contracts with players they intend to sell, or that wish to go.”
In which case every single player with a contract in world football is up for grabs. Including yours.
posted on 8/6/18
A well known trend
posted on 8/6/18
Even if Kane was to move on it would be for a fee significantly higher than £70m
I'm sure the article is a wind up but Kane will give it at least one season in the new stadium.
If Spurs win a trophy next season I think that would pretty much guarantee another season.
That said, I would expect him to have moved on before he is 27 if he has genuine aspirations of winning the League Title and/or the CL.
I don't see Spurs winning either competition at the expense of City, United or Liverpool in the next 5 years.
posted on 8/6/18
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 42 minutes ago
Even if Kane was to move on it would be for a fee significantly higher than £70m
I'm sure the article is a wind up but Kane will give it at least one season in the new stadium.
If Spurs win a trophy next season I think that would pretty much guarantee another season.
That said, I would expect him to have moved on before he is 27 if he has genuine aspirations of winning the League Title and/or the CL.
I don't see Spurs winning either competition at the expense of City, United or Liverpool in the next 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool
How do you know what is going to happen in the next five years?
posted on 8/6/18
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 42 minutes ago
Even if Kane was to move on it would be for a fee significantly higher than £70m
I'm sure the article is a wind up but Kane will give it at least one season in the new stadium.
If Spurs win a trophy next season I think that would pretty much guarantee another season.
That said, I would expect him to have moved on before he is 27 if he has genuine aspirations of winning the League Title and/or the CL.
I don't see Spurs winning either competition at the expense of City, United or Liverpool in the next 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool
How do you know what is going to happen in the next five years?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t
Laugh at Liverpool all you want.
They are, in my opinion, more likely to challenge for the top honours in the coming seasons.
That opinion is based on their performances against City this past season, which gives me the sense they will be City's main challengers in 2018/19 and beyond.
If you feel different, put forward a constructive argument.
posted on 8/6/18
W4nker
posted on 9/6/18
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 8 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 42 minutes ago
Even if Kane was to move on it would be for a fee significantly higher than £70m
I'm sure the article is a wind up but Kane will give it at least one season in the new stadium.
If Spurs win a trophy next season I think that would pretty much guarantee another season.
That said, I would expect him to have moved on before he is 27 if he has genuine aspirations of winning the League Title and/or the CL.
I don't see Spurs winning either competition at the expense of City, United or Liverpool in the next 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool
How do you know what is going to happen in the next five years?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t
Laugh at Liverpool all you want.
They are, in my opinion, more likely to challenge for the top honours in the coming seasons.
That opinion is based on their performances against City this past season, which gives me the sense they will be City's main challengers in 2018/19 and beyond.
If you feel different, put forward a constructive argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool beating City is not a constructive argument for them doing well, they are your bogey team, Liverpool beat you when you are good or bad. How many times have Cityy won at Anfield in the past 30 years?
Spurs finishing above Liverpool year on year is a more constructive argument to why Liverpool won't do as well as you think.
posted on 9/6/18
comment by THudd. (U1029)
posted 18 hours, 9 minutes ago
Can I have some facts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your a hand pump...FACT.
posted on 9/6/18
Excellent effort OP.
I think every single spudling has taken a nibble here
posted on 9/6/18
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 15 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 42 minutes ago
Even if Kane was to move on it would be for a fee significantly higher than £70m
I'm sure the article is a wind up but Kane will give it at least one season in the new stadium.
If Spurs win a trophy next season I think that would pretty much guarantee another season.
That said, I would expect him to have moved on before he is 27 if he has genuine aspirations of winning the League Title and/or the CL.
I don't see Spurs winning either competition at the expense of City, United or Liverpool in the next 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool
How do you know what is going to happen in the next five years?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t
Laugh at Liverpool all you want.
They are, in my opinion, more likely to challenge for the top honours in the coming seasons.
That opinion is based on their performances against City this past season, which gives me the sense they will be City's main challengers in 2018/19 and beyond.
If you feel different, put forward a constructive argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because that's how it works
City bottle it against their bogey side over 2 legs and it makes the opposition's next 5yrs rosy
posted on 10/6/18
That's a fact is "fake News". Big Time rubbish!
posted on 11/6/18
OP you do realise Kane pretty much signs a new contract every year!
posted on 12/10/19
Looks like I will be proven right.
posted on 13/10/19
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted on 9/6/18
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 15 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 42 minutes ago
Even if Kane was to move on it would be for a fee significantly higher than £70m
I'm sure the article is a wind up but Kane will give it at least one season in the new stadium.
If Spurs win a trophy next season I think that would pretty much guarantee another season.
That said, I would expect him to have moved on before he is 27 if he has genuine aspirations of winning the League Title and/or the CL.
I don't see Spurs winning either competition at the expense of City, United or Liverpool in the next 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool
How do you know what is going to happen in the next five years?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t
Laugh at Liverpool all you want.
They are, in my opinion, more likely to challenge for the top honours in the coming seasons.
That opinion is based on their performances against City this past season, which gives me the sense they will be City's main challengers in 2018/19 and beyond.
If you feel different, put forward a constructive argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because that's how it works
City bottle it against their bogey side over 2 legs and it makes the opposition's next 5yrs rosy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 13/10/19
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted on 9/6/18
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 8 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by FishMCFC (U16301)
posted 42 minutes ago
Even if Kane was to move on it would be for a fee significantly higher than £70m
I'm sure the article is a wind up but Kane will give it at least one season in the new stadium.
If Spurs win a trophy next season I think that would pretty much guarantee another season.
That said, I would expect him to have moved on before he is 27 if he has genuine aspirations of winning the League Title and/or the CL.
I don't see Spurs winning either competition at the expense of City, United or Liverpool in the next 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool
How do you know what is going to happen in the next five years?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t
Laugh at Liverpool all you want.
They are, in my opinion, more likely to challenge for the top honours in the coming seasons.
That opinion is based on their performances against City this past season, which gives me the sense they will be City's main challengers in 2018/19 and beyond.
If you feel different, put forward a constructive argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool beating City is not a constructive argument for them doing well, they are your bogey team, Liverpool beat you when you are good or bad. How many times have Cityy won at Anfield in the past 30 years?
Spurs finishing above Liverpool year on year is a more constructive argument to why Liverpool won't do as well as you think.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From this to Poch out.
Page 3 of 3