or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 64 comments are related to an article called:

Morelos

Page 2 of 3

posted on 30/8/18

comment by Partick Bateman (U14112)
posted 2 hours, 11 minutes ago
I’m only goin on what they said on Radio Scotland.

Now I’m seeinh loads of folk saying it’s soft and he didn’t touch the ref.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
He didn't, he was yards away from the ref, he was growling as he does, nodding his head, he had been fouled and the ufa boy got a free kick, he kicked the ball and got booked , wasn't happy and got booked again, it's his first red card of his career , he will learn

posted on 30/8/18

Where has this idea if it’s been rescinded it didn’t happen come from?

posted on 30/8/18

The amount of times he could have been sent off for petulant behaviour i'm surprised this is only his second tbh.

comment by Timmy (U14278)

posted on 30/8/18

Liability for the old firm game.

posted on 30/8/18

comment by Miller Going for 5-5 (U9310)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
Where has this idea if it’s been rescinded it didn’t happen come from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's no longer a red card if it's rescinded, it no longer exists , it's not on his records , it doesn't really have to come from somewhere, its logic and common sense, it's a bit like a conviction being quashed, you are no longer a criminal

posted on 30/8/18

comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 56 minutes ago
Liability for the old firm game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok we won't play him


Are you sh!ting it Timmy

posted on 30/8/18

comment by Laudrup: Tom Eriocrity (U12366)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Miller Going for 5-5 (U9310)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
Where has this idea if it’s been rescinded it didn’t happen come from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's no longer a red card if it's rescinded, it no longer exists , it's not on his records , it doesn't really have to come from somewhere, its logic and common sense, it's a bit like a conviction being quashed, you are no longer a criminal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would still have served whatever time though. He’s been red carded in two games. There is no need for revisionism. It still exists in the record of that game

posted on 31/8/18

No it’s one red card

I think people need to learn what rescinded means. no revionosm here. Jack st cold hard facts ok afraid

posted on 31/8/18

*just

posted on 31/8/18

He was still red card even if it was later deemed incorrect. Rangers still played 81 minutes a man down. It is revisionist to say it doesn't exist.

posted on 31/8/18

It doesn’t in the record books.

Was he still banned which is the punishment for a red card? Of course he wasn’t. Yes we played 80 mins with 10 men due to a red error. But that can’t be helped. The first opportunity to review it, it was deemed it wasn’t a red card.

It’s a silly argument to say it was still a red when it’s benn rescinded as on review it wasn’t deemed a red.

Bizarre argument actually

posted on 31/8/18

No one is debating it being rescinded or that he didnt serve a suspension. He has been sent off in games twice this season. One was later rescinded but he has had his team a man down twice. Did he receive a red card v Aberdeen or not during the game? If not why did he leave the pitch? Something happening and after the fact being deemed incorrect and avoiding a suspension doesnt mean it hasnt happened.

posted on 31/8/18

comment by Miller Going for 5-5 (U9310)
posted 58 seconds ago
No one is debating it being rescinded or that he didnt serve a suspension. He has been sent off in games twice this season. One was later rescinded but he has had his team a man down twice. Did he receive a red card v Aberdeen or not during the game? If not why did he leave the pitch? Something happening and after the fact being deemed incorrect and avoiding a suspension doesnt mean it hasnt happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you are being a pedantic.

Clearly a red card was shown
Clearly this was taken away later.

A bit like being found guilty then on appeal being not guilty

Im sure if you told the now not guilty guy, ah but you did get found guilty originally you would be being silly.

posted on 31/8/18

Yeah I agree duke and I’m not going to keep arguing the point. It’s very silly argument when the facts clearly state he’s had one red card.

posted on 31/8/18

comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah I agree duke and I’m not going to keep arguing the point. It’s very silly argument when the facts clearly state he’s had one red card.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
if I buy 2 pies for ma fat bassa lunch and then take 1 pie back to the shop and get a refund

How many pies will I have for lunch?

2 because I did originally buy 2

I think this is what Miller is saying.

posted on 31/8/18

Its not what I'm saying at all. If you get done for a crime and it is later quashed but you served a day in prison whilst you are not a criminal have you served any time?

posted on 31/8/18

but yes you would have bought two and returned one

posted on 31/8/18

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 31/8/18

Mmmm pies <slaver>


I get the point being made but I think it’s daft.

posted on 31/8/18

comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
No it’s one red card

I think people need to learn what rescinded means.no revionosm here. Jack st cold hard facts ok afraid
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Baws baws and utter baws.

Wriggling around trying to stop maintain he wants dished out a red card. “Rescinded so it didn’t happen”.

“Fuxakes” 😂😂

Millions saw it. Did they just see something you and Laudrup (what a shock) didn’t?

Christ almighty 😂😂😂

posted on 31/8/18

Duke.

You bought two pies. Take one back ya greedy bassa 😂

posted on 31/8/18

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 31/8/18

comment by Miller Going for 5-5 (U9310)
posted 14 seconds ago
Its not what I'm saying at all. If you get done for a crime and it is later quashed but you served a day in prison whilst you are not a criminal have you served any time?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you are being silly mate.

The fact you have served time is not the issue

The fact is you have been found not guilty

Ultimately that is what counts, its the only thing that counts.

Now were you to say Morelos and his actions have previously caused him issues then you would be correct.

The red card previously given happened yes....but now its scrubbed from the records.
So it didn't

Their really is no other sensible way to look at it.

You can look at it another way, though that would be silly.

posted on 31/8/18

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
Duke.

You bought two pies. Take one back ya greedy bassa 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I already have and will only have 1 pie

posted on 31/8/18

comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
Duke.

You bought two pies. Take one back ya greedy bassa 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I already have and will only have 1 pie
----------------------------------------------------------------------

😂
Well done on the diet front. Was going to have a chat with you about that 😂😂

The point is, did you buy two pies at some point in time? 😎

Page 2 of 3

Sign in if you want to comment