Adidas can only afford to buy Real Madrid because we sold so many Pogba shirts. Basically, Pogba > Real Madrid.
Your comment is flawed because the proceeds of kit sales go to the manufacturer so if Pogba was selling so many shirts it would benefit Adidas.
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 6 minutes ago
Your comment is flawed because the proceeds of kit sales go to the manufacturer so if Pogba was selling so many shirts it would benefit Adidas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what I said. We made the £89m back that we spent on Pogba, from shirt sales, and the rest of the Pogba shirt sale money (approx. £752.6m) went to Adidas, hence they can afford to buy Real Madrid. It is not difficult to understand.
......and RM and ManU ,are only mid-table teams ! or
comment by Ben Hutchinson (U1734)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 6 minutes ago
Your comment is flawed because the proceeds of kit sales go to the manufacturer so if Pogba was selling so many shirts it would benefit Adidas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what I said. We made the £89m back that we spent on Pogba, from shirt sales, and the rest of the Pogba shirt sale money (approx. £752.6m) went to Adidas, hence they can afford to buy Real Madrid. It is not difficult to understand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not to mention the advertising revenue from pogba’s twitter account. 45m from Vidal Sassoon ads alone.
comment by Ben Hutchinson (U1734)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 6 minutes ago
Your comment is flawed because the proceeds of kit sales go to the manufacturer so if Pogba was selling so many shirts it would benefit Adidas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what I said. We made the £89m back that we spent on Pogba, from shirt sales, and the rest of the Pogba shirt sale money (approx. £752.6m) went to Adidas, hence they can afford to buy Real Madrid. It is not difficult to understand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you didnt make it back on shirt sales, because United doesnt get much from selling a shirt.
Clubs will traditionally receive an annual fee – for example, Manchester United receives £75 million per year from Adidas, Chelsea receives an initial £60 million per year from Nike, and Arsenal receives £30 million per year from Puma – and then 10-15% of the revenue the kit manufacturer generates from shirt sales.
I doubt you made 89 million of selling Pogba shirts in the past 2 years.
Spurs just signed a deal to get £30m for the next 15 years
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 1 minute ago
Spurs just signed a deal to get £30m for the next 15 years
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Ben Hutchinson (U1734)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 6 minutes ago
Your comment is flawed because the proceeds of kit sales go to the manufacturer so if Pogba was selling so many shirts it would benefit Adidas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what I said. We made the £89m back that we spent on Pogba, from shirt sales, and the rest of the Pogba shirt sale money (approx. £752.6m) went to Adidas, hence they can afford to buy Real Madrid. It is not difficult to understand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you didnt make it back on shirt sales, because United doesnt get much from selling a shirt.
Clubs will traditionally receive an annual fee – for example, Manchester United receives £75 million per year from Adidas, Chelsea receives an initial £60 million per year from Nike, and Arsenal receives £30 million per year from Puma – and then 10-15% of the revenue the kit manufacturer generates from shirt sales.
I doubt you made 89 million of selling Pogba shirts in the past 2 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We made £89m in the first year. Then for the 2nd year it was all profit. It is one of the most profitable business deals, not only in sport, but in business in general. You just have to look at the New York Stock Exchange
1. Apple
2. Pogba shirt sales
3. Alphabet
4. Microsoft.
So just one company more profitable than Pogba shirt sales. It's an incredible achievement by the club.
Clog wearing windmill fcker getting barry'd again.
comment by Ben Hutchinson (U1734)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Ben Hutchinson (U1734)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 6 minutes ago
Your comment is flawed because the proceeds of kit sales go to the manufacturer so if Pogba was selling so many shirts it would benefit Adidas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what I said. We made the £89m back that we spent on Pogba, from shirt sales, and the rest of the Pogba shirt sale money (approx. £752.6m) went to Adidas, hence they can afford to buy Real Madrid. It is not difficult to understand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you didnt make it back on shirt sales, because United doesnt get much from selling a shirt.
Clubs will traditionally receive an annual fee – for example, Manchester United receives £75 million per year from Adidas, Chelsea receives an initial £60 million per year from Nike, and Arsenal receives £30 million per year from Puma – and then 10-15% of the revenue the kit manufacturer generates from shirt sales.
I doubt you made 89 million of selling Pogba shirts in the past 2 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We made £89m in the first year. Then for the 2nd year it was all profit. It is one of the most profitable business deals, not only in sport, but in business in general. You just have to look at the New York Stock Exchange
1. Apple
2. Pogba shirt sales
3. Alphabet
4. Microsoft.
So just one company more profitable than Pogba shirt sales. It's an incredible achievement by the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're just pulling these out of thin air aren't you?
Everybody knows Rooney is above Microsoft.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
RM Kit deal: 1.1bn
Page 1 of 1
posted on 5/11/18
Adidas can only afford to buy Real Madrid because we sold so many Pogba shirts. Basically, Pogba > Real Madrid.
posted on 5/11/18
Your comment is flawed because the proceeds of kit sales go to the manufacturer so if Pogba was selling so many shirts it would benefit Adidas.
posted on 5/11/18
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 6 minutes ago
Your comment is flawed because the proceeds of kit sales go to the manufacturer so if Pogba was selling so many shirts it would benefit Adidas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what I said. We made the £89m back that we spent on Pogba, from shirt sales, and the rest of the Pogba shirt sale money (approx. £752.6m) went to Adidas, hence they can afford to buy Real Madrid. It is not difficult to understand.
posted on 5/11/18
......and RM and ManU ,are only mid-table teams ! or
posted on 5/11/18
comment by Ben Hutchinson (U1734)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 6 minutes ago
Your comment is flawed because the proceeds of kit sales go to the manufacturer so if Pogba was selling so many shirts it would benefit Adidas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what I said. We made the £89m back that we spent on Pogba, from shirt sales, and the rest of the Pogba shirt sale money (approx. £752.6m) went to Adidas, hence they can afford to buy Real Madrid. It is not difficult to understand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not to mention the advertising revenue from pogba’s twitter account. 45m from Vidal Sassoon ads alone.
posted on 5/11/18
comment by Ben Hutchinson (U1734)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 6 minutes ago
Your comment is flawed because the proceeds of kit sales go to the manufacturer so if Pogba was selling so many shirts it would benefit Adidas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what I said. We made the £89m back that we spent on Pogba, from shirt sales, and the rest of the Pogba shirt sale money (approx. £752.6m) went to Adidas, hence they can afford to buy Real Madrid. It is not difficult to understand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you didnt make it back on shirt sales, because United doesnt get much from selling a shirt.
Clubs will traditionally receive an annual fee – for example, Manchester United receives £75 million per year from Adidas, Chelsea receives an initial £60 million per year from Nike, and Arsenal receives £30 million per year from Puma – and then 10-15% of the revenue the kit manufacturer generates from shirt sales.
I doubt you made 89 million of selling Pogba shirts in the past 2 years.
posted on 5/11/18
Spurs just signed a deal to get £30m for the next 15 years
posted on 5/11/18
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 1 minute ago
Spurs just signed a deal to get £30m for the next 15 years
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 5/11/18
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Ben Hutchinson (U1734)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 6 minutes ago
Your comment is flawed because the proceeds of kit sales go to the manufacturer so if Pogba was selling so many shirts it would benefit Adidas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what I said. We made the £89m back that we spent on Pogba, from shirt sales, and the rest of the Pogba shirt sale money (approx. £752.6m) went to Adidas, hence they can afford to buy Real Madrid. It is not difficult to understand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you didnt make it back on shirt sales, because United doesnt get much from selling a shirt.
Clubs will traditionally receive an annual fee – for example, Manchester United receives £75 million per year from Adidas, Chelsea receives an initial £60 million per year from Nike, and Arsenal receives £30 million per year from Puma – and then 10-15% of the revenue the kit manufacturer generates from shirt sales.
I doubt you made 89 million of selling Pogba shirts in the past 2 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We made £89m in the first year. Then for the 2nd year it was all profit. It is one of the most profitable business deals, not only in sport, but in business in general. You just have to look at the New York Stock Exchange
1. Apple
2. Pogba shirt sales
3. Alphabet
4. Microsoft.
So just one company more profitable than Pogba shirt sales. It's an incredible achievement by the club.
posted on 5/11/18
Clog wearing windmill fcker getting barry'd again.
posted on 5/11/18
comment by Ben Hutchinson (U1734)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Ben Hutchinson (U1734)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 6 minutes ago
Your comment is flawed because the proceeds of kit sales go to the manufacturer so if Pogba was selling so many shirts it would benefit Adidas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what I said. We made the £89m back that we spent on Pogba, from shirt sales, and the rest of the Pogba shirt sale money (approx. £752.6m) went to Adidas, hence they can afford to buy Real Madrid. It is not difficult to understand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you didnt make it back on shirt sales, because United doesnt get much from selling a shirt.
Clubs will traditionally receive an annual fee – for example, Manchester United receives £75 million per year from Adidas, Chelsea receives an initial £60 million per year from Nike, and Arsenal receives £30 million per year from Puma – and then 10-15% of the revenue the kit manufacturer generates from shirt sales.
I doubt you made 89 million of selling Pogba shirts in the past 2 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We made £89m in the first year. Then for the 2nd year it was all profit. It is one of the most profitable business deals, not only in sport, but in business in general. You just have to look at the New York Stock Exchange
1. Apple
2. Pogba shirt sales
3. Alphabet
4. Microsoft.
So just one company more profitable than Pogba shirt sales. It's an incredible achievement by the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're just pulling these out of thin air aren't you?
Everybody knows Rooney is above Microsoft.
Page 1 of 1