or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 57 comments are related to an article called:

Candeias Ruling

Page 1 of 3

posted on 14/11/18

Absolutely correct by Collum and the SFA.

Now if Collum had said that he didn't see Candeias gesturing but had only heard it.....

posted on 14/11/18

Must have some pair of lugs to hear someone gesturing
Mon the broadfoot mags
☺️

posted on 14/11/18



It’s a daft booking, as was the appeal. Believe the appeal was only done to make a point by Rangers as it was always going to fail.

posted on 14/11/18

comment by puyolsnohadahaircut (U6410)
posted 10 minutes ago
Must have some pair of lugs to hear someone gesturing
Mon the broadfoot mags
☺️
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't never heard fack all. Was desperate to give rangers a penalty that day. I know Collum and I know exactly what he's up to.

posted on 14/11/18

correct decision..

don't know what the fuss was all about...

Candeias, doing this now, but only a few weeks prior ,he wouldn't shake anyone's hand after getting beat

poor show tbh. Gerrard needs to sort it out.

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 14/11/18

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 14/11/18

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 14/11/18

What did Ferdinand get booked for ................... gesturing at Candeias chin with his fist, snidey cvnt.

posted on 14/11/18

Brought it on himself.

Could've incited a riot.

Etc

posted on 14/11/18

comment by puyolsnohadahaircut (U6410)
posted 59 minutes ago
Must have some pair of lugs to hear someone gesturing
Mon the broadfoot mags
☺️
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My lungs have 20/20 hearing

posted on 14/11/18

Just saw my username there and thought who's that pr¡CK?

Forgot I changed it the other night

comment by lauders (U9757)

posted on 14/11/18

No one noticed.

posted on 14/11/18

Aye neither did I

posted on 14/11/18

That’s still a ridiculous booking and red card.

If that’s a booking surely Ferdinand should’ve been sent off for striking Candeias?

posted on 14/11/18

comment by rats juice smothercunt (U6393)
posted 4 minutes ago
That’s still a ridiculous booking and red card.

If that’s a booking surely Ferdinand should’ve been sent off for striking Candeias?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ferdinand got a yellow for his part in it.

posted on 14/11/18

I know but is that enough for his jab to the chin? May not have been much but still intent was there and it could’ve been perceived as violent conduct.

posted on 14/11/18

Candeias is a bit daft for doing it but it’s very harsh. Ferdinand’s conduct is far more deserving of a card imo.

Doesn’t really matter as it’s done now but Collum is a total helmet regardless.

posted on 14/11/18

Think it was harsh on Candeias and at least a yellow for Ferdinand.

posted on 14/11/18

He blew him a kiss while celebrating. That apparently is a yellow card. Mental

posted on 14/11/18

Collum doesn’t like gaays.

posted on 14/11/18

I think Gerrard and Rangers will be gobsmacked at what Collum deemed worthy of fouls and cards.

Mind you there’s nothing new here. The inconsistency of refs is quite shocking.

Atakayi was on the park ten mins when the guy went in with a late high boot which took Atakayi right out and he’s now injured. I don’t even think a foul was given. Certainly not a card anyway.

posted on 15/11/18

The most ridiculous backtracking. If that was the reason for the yellow (he blew a kiss), then why did the ref not mention it to the player at the time of showing the card? Ludicrous lies to cover a mistake, neither wonder our "product" is so undervalued...

posted on 15/11/18

comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......Schizophrenia was my idea!.....No it wasn't!.....You are never alone with a Schizo :D (U2115)
posted 20 minutes ago
The most ridiculous backtracking. If that was the reason for the yellow (he blew a kiss), then why did the ref not mention it to the player at the time of showing the card? Ludicrous lies to cover a mistake, neither wonder our "product" is so undervalued...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you know that the ref didn't mention it to him at the time?

Did you all think that collum had just decided to book the player for no reason whatsoever.?

posted on 15/11/18

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 15/11/18

This is one of the most bizarre explanations I have seen.

The second yellow was for 'two incidents'?

1. Gesturing towards an opponent and then 2. 'becoming further involved' with an opponent as he made his way up field.

So these two things add up to a yellow card now?

How much of the yellow card was the gesture and how much was the second part?

And if he had only made the gesture and not got involved with Ferdinand (and by getting 'involved' all Candeais did was speak to him as Ferdinand put him in a wee head lock) then would he have just been booked for the gesture? You have to think not as the subsequent involvement wouldn't have been brought up as part of it.

And if he wouldn't have been booked for the gesture alone then how much involvement with another player after making a gesture tips you over the yellow card threshold?

Does this mean that if Candeais hadn't allowed Ferdinand to manhandle him then he could have escaped a red card?

It is utterly comical to be honest.

Embarrassing is the right word.

Page 1 of 3

Sign in if you want to comment