comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 1 hour, 8 minutes ago
Another empty mouthpiece. If it goes to court, which it will, UEFA will almost certainly lose and the mouthpieces who have gone public will be sued. Those who spout rubbish but won't stand up in court are just vacuous mouthpieces.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to court for what exactly? UEFA not allowing you to take part in their invite only competitions?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 18 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 1 hour, 8 minutes ago
Another empty mouthpiece. If it goes to court, which it will, UEFA will almost certainly lose and the mouthpieces who have gone public will be sued. Those who spout rubbish but won't stand up in court are just vacuous mouthpieces.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to court for what exactly? UEFA not allowing you to take part in their invite only competitions?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
UEFA not subject to the CAS? Or just somethng else you don't know?

comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 1 hour, 38 minutes ago
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 18 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 1 hour, 8 minutes ago
Another empty mouthpiece. If it goes to court, which it will, UEFA will almost certainly lose and the mouthpieces who have gone public will be sued. Those who spout rubbish but won't stand up in court are just vacuous mouthpieces.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to court for what exactly? UEFA not allowing you to take part in their invite only competitions?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
UEFA not subject to the CAS? Or just somethng else you don't know?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You tell me.. champions league is a UEFA competition so accepting entry to it means you agree with the rules they stipulate.

City fans thinking about the CAS already as a course of appeal
Looking for a way out like a fat rat trapped in a maze.

Not even close. Merely following what the owners have stated that they will do rather than ja606 experts. Better those with actual knowledge than a know nothing.

So they're already thinking about the CAS to mitigate punishment..

Like a fat rat trapped in a maze.

The fat rats are the ones hoping City get punished. The owners want to break the cartel that is trying to restrict competition.

comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 7 minutes ago
The fat rats are the ones hoping City get punished. The owners want to break the cartel that is trying to restrict competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ll find that the fat rats are those who think they can do what they like in distorting the competition, including running fouls of rules in place to protect the game and healthy competition.

Look at PSG in France or Chelsea and now Man City..

Yeah hope Man City do get punished if what Der Spiegel has reported is true. It wasn’t as if it would be an oversight or mistake either. It’s going the extra two miles to paper over spending that is contrary to the rules.

Man City is owned by Abu Dhabi, this is clear. There is a massive conflict of interest when their sponsor is the flag carrier, Etihad. Effectively channelling government funds to Man City.

It facking stinks, and too right it’s being investigated.

PSG related corruption

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-48382591

Put that on the PSG page.

Jeez these guys are desperate to see City banned, forgetting the sins of their clubs and fans in the past. Basically in some peoples view investment prior to City and Chelsea=Good, Investment in City and Chelsea =Bad. Some of the fan riots in the past justify a 100 year ban from all international football but they don't mention those. Just interested in keeping the same old Sky 4 with their nose in the trough.

Have City been banned for the CL yet?

What you refer to clubs have already been banned for, some more severely than others.

So desperate are you to see your club avoid sanction, alas it will be in vain if the reports about Man City covering up sources of finances etc are to be believed.

Any club or body who have made up allegations will be in a lot of trouble if this goes to court, which the City owners seem keen to do.

comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 1 minute ago
Any club or body who have made up allegations will be in a lot of trouble if this goes to court, which the City owners seem keen to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes a change from them trying to find out who hacked into the city email server and stole 'fake info!

The desperation of some for this to be true is unreal, Happy to ignore the sins of the past.

comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 2 minutes ago
The desperation of some for this to be true is unreal, Happy to ignore the sins of the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Happy to ignore what?

Facking clown..

"City responded that the allegations were based on “hacked or stolen” emails, and challenged Uefa to support stronger protection against hacking. "

The only desperation is from City and their fans.

"City responded that the allegations were based on “hacked or stolen” emails, and challenged Uefa to support stronger protection against hacking. "

What the fek is wrong with that you clown?

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 43 seconds ago
"City responded that the allegations were based on “hacked or stolen” emails, and challenged Uefa to support stronger protection against hacking. "

What the fek is wrong with that you clown?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The desperation for city fans for it not to be true when the info came from Man City! However underhand

The accusation of financial irregularities remains entirely false and the CFCB IC referral ignores a comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence provided by Manchester City FC to the Chamber.

The decision contains mistakes, misinterpretations and confusions fundamentally borne out of a basic lack of due process and there remain significant unresolved matters raised by Manchester City FC as part of what the Club has found to be a wholly unsatisfactory, curtailed, and hostile process.

What are City complaining about? Their emails being hacked allowing the info to be known?

Complaing about emails being stolen then used out of context and probably doctored.

Obviously the morality of theft is above a Liverpool fan but it's still illegal.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 12 hours, 38 minutes ago
Complaing about emails being stolen then used out of context and probably doctored.

Obviously the morality of theft is above a Liverpool fan but it's still illegal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said they were used out of context and probably doctored?

Morality, you are trying to bring morality in here in reference to Man Cities ownership and FFP dodging? Wtf

Zero self awareness from you.. the fact that you overlook their human rights records in the first place just because they give your club some money shows where your morals are.

Probably doctored

comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 30 seconds ago
Probably doctored
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know

Would be easy to disprove by showing the actual email with its digital signature.

Desperation stuff from Inky, and having to comment on morals to defend City ownership.. HAHAHAHAAAA

Unless they were quickly deleted 🧐